John Podesta's good friend Peter Kadzik is in charge of Clinton email probe at DOJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person who doesn't care:

It has now been revealed that Kadzik's wife (Amy Weiss) was Deputy Press Secretary to Bill Clinton in the White HOuse--the Clinton administration.

And, now her husband--Podesta's good buddy, who fed him backchannel information--is in charge of the DOJ investigation. No, move along, nothing to see here.

Again, how does this affect me? And as to "national secrets being compromised" please give an example of this aside from who worked for whom and who paid what to whom.

Hillary had TS/SCI/SAP intelligence on her unsecured private server. FBI docs show at least 1 successful e-mail hack.

And what "secret information" was compromised? I doubt the Russians care who hired someone's wife.

Well that's one of the problems..we don't know what information has been accessed, just that there was at least one confirmed hack. We know there was TS/SCI/SAP on the server, so if that information was compromised, that's a very big deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

Fine. I don't care as it pertains to what I'm doing next Tuesday. Better?

And to the other PP, I don't see how it could affect me personally. Because I'm not paranoid.

Why would you lable someone who lived through socializm as paranoid. I know how it looks like in reality and i see the symptoms of it in US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

I don't think Hillary's supporters are crazy, they just ignorant. They don't read the orignial sources or different sources of information. They get their information from 1-2 sites that brainwashed them. And then they take an ostrich position "I don't care" becasue they don't have enough information to make an intelligent decision.

If voting for Trump is your definition of an "intelligent decision" then no thanks. I'll stick with "crazy."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I honestly don't know how anybody can defend this anymore.

We're not defending it. We're just saying we don't care.

Unitl it affects you and it will be too late?

You can still vote for Hillary, but to say that you don't care about this exposure of Washington corruption? That's crazy.

What's crazy is that your candidate is so irredeemably terrible that people are choosing to ignore this and vote against him anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.npr.org/2016/10/31/500110247/white-house-wont-second-guess-fbi-directors-judgment

Look here is NPR - your favorite liberal source - confirming that Kadzik is in charge.

Now, step 2 - go to Wikileaks.org and do a search of the Podesta emails for "Kadzik."

And --- ding ding ding - you will see that Kadzik and the Podesta brothers are good friends.

And this my friends is why we are all thankful for social media and Wikileaks and why the mainstream media is the lamestream media.

Yeah. A lot of people know each other. You didn't realize that?

Apparently Trumpsters think that everyone should be alone and friendless, accompanied only by bought-and-paid-for wives, just like their hero.

[Anonymous]

Rotten to the core.

Still, it will give hope to the little people, when they get dragged through the courts for minor security infractions. It will be called the Hillary Defence.

[Anonymous]

Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

[Anonymous]

Media Matters = David Brock run/left leaning group affiliated with Clintons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Media Matters = David Brock run/left leaning group affiliated with Clintons.

So Kadzik is not in charge of Legislative Affairs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

regardless of his role at DOJ, if he is involved in any way in the clinton investigation (which he is, as the person tasked with informing Congress about the inv.), he should recuse himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

regardless of his role at DOJ, if he is involved in any way in the clinton investigation (which he is, as the person tasked with informing Congress about the inv.), he should recuse himself.

Yes, still waiting.... but he's another corrupted Clintonite.

How shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

regardless of his role at DOJ, if he is involved in any way in the clinton investigation (which he is, as the person tasked with informing Congress about the inv.), he should recuse himself.

Yes, still waiting.... but he's another corrupted Clintonite.

How shameful.

Strange to say but so far Comey the chior boy so far despite old hstory with the Clinton team

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

regardless of his role at DOJ, if he is involved in any way in the clinton investigation (which he is, as the person tasked with informing Congress about the inv.), he should recuse himself.

Yes, still waiting.... but he's another corrupted Clintonite.

How shameful.

Strange to say but so far Comey the chior boy so far despite old hstory with the Clinton team

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you people do ANY research or engage in any critical thinking before you start spreading wrong information? Peter Kadzik is not in charge of the email investigation. His JOB is to interface with Congress. He works for the Office of Legislative Affairs. That office investigates nothing. Sheesh.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/11/01/no-doj-official-podesta-ties-isn-t-overseeing-fbi-s-email-review/214222

regardless of his role at DOJ, if he is involved in any way in the clinton investigation (which he is, as the person tasked with informing Congress about the inv.), he should recuse himself.

Yes, still waiting.... but he's another corrupted Clintonite.

How shameful.

Strange to say but so far Comey the chior boy so far despite old hstory with the Clinton team

English please.