|
Here's the thing. A child who is 95%ile for height isn't supposed to be 95%ile for weight. That's not the way it works. If you think it is, discuss it with your Ped and they will explain.
95% for weight is almost always overweight. 95%ile for height is just tall. My three kids in the 90+%ile for height all have different body types, different skeletons, builds, etc. None of them have ever been over 75%ILE for weight after a year and you would never think they were too thin. |
Sorry, I meant to say that my 7 year old DD is 52 inches and 45 lbs. OP -- if you're DD is only 42 inches and 51 lbs, she is probably overweight. My sister has a son who is on the bigger side and her ped said that weight and height should be roughly the same. So for 42 inches, 42 lbs would be about right. |
Well, my ped would (and has) disagree. As did the one before. Being 95% for height AND weight does not necessarily equate to being overweight. It could. But it doesn't have to. |
| How tall are you and your husband? |
I wondered the same thing. |
| Has she always been on the same curve on the growth chart? Did she no go through the picky eating phase or something? |
Nope. Definitely didn't type in the numbers wrong. BMI is a very flawed system of measurement. |
| All of you posting your kids' heights and weights - no one cares. |
I think they're trying to give OP perspective on her own kid's size. Perhaps OP doesn't care, but she really should. |
|
Good grief. My DS is three, 50 lbs and 43". He's fine. It's called having tall parents. Gigantism has features beyond being big.
|
I have to agree, my 50% height and 50% weight child just scored obese as well. There is NO way she's obese. |
Agree, my BMI actually increased after I lost 40 lbs. I don't trust it at all. |
That isn't possible |
If your height didn't change, then I think you did the math wrong. It's a really simple formula. |
| uh..I weighed less than your three year old in third grade. |