Thank you. I hate GGW, so this helps me eliminate people from consideration. |
This is my big issue with the development. In our neighborhood, every house that goes down (usually with an older person in it), leads to two or three being built for people with families. (Plus they are replacing middle class housing with very upper middle class housing, which is tiresome.) Our schools are so overcrowded. It takes decades for the county to get around to building new schools. At best, they just expand the current schools so you end up with an ES that has multiple floors and wings, but no field space to play games. I don't think they should keep expanding the development unless the developers are willing to buy some property to set aside as new schools. The private schools seem to be able to find properties to buy to keep expanding, but there's no $$ for MCPS to buy space for additional schools. I think I'm leaning to Glass, unenthusiastically, by process of elimination. |
Agree with that on Friedson. I think he is smart, but the one time I met with him on something, I raised an different perspective on a small point, and he got really huffy and mansplaining about it. It was weird because we were essentially on the same side of the issue. |
That logic is so faulty. Oh, you find what you are specifically looking for? Type this into Google: andrew friedson developer. pages and pages of results. Or try Will Jawando socialist. Pages and pages of results! |
The assertion was that you didn’t know anything about him other than he is vegan and he is gay, and that he hasn’t articulated a vision. And then you link to a source that mentions he is gay and then explicitly lays out his priorities, experience, and approach to governing? |
Interesting that Jawando didn't do the GGW questionnaire. That makes me want to support him more. Perhaps he knew he wouldn't be able to pander to the developer propagandists at GGW. |
Absolutely. |
| Glass put out a press release claiming to be in the lead. The poll showed Glass up by one over Jawando and up by five over Friedson. Almost half of the people polled were undecided, so it’s too early to say that Friedson doesn’t have a lane, but the YIMBY narrative that it was important to consolidate behind Friedson to avoid splitting the YIMBY vote seems off base. At this point, the discussion should be about whether Friedson is going to hurt Glass and result in Jawando, much as Riemer hurt Blair and resulted in Elrich. |
| I think it's interesting that Friedson's donors are all across the county. Glass thinks Friedson doesn't have a shot because he's a district Councilmember. But I think Friedson has a real shot |
I think it’s interesting that Friedson has raised most his money from the real estate industry and that some of the companies that have maxed out for him also received lucrative subsidies that he sponsored. In fact, I find that much more interesting than the point you were trying to make. |
I know that's what everyone assumes but do you have evidence? Down to the $$? I haven't looked at contributions because I don't have a ton of free time to do that type of analysis. But happy to read yours |
Yes, it’s all available here: https://campaignfinance.maryland.gov/login. Be sure to look at his reports from previous years. You can see, for example, Five Squares, maxing out for him right after getting a big subsidy. |
+1 |
I knew Jawando back before he ran for office, with him going to regular meetings at GGW's Dan Reed's house. How times have changed. |