Abolish Boundary Maps Fairfax

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. This is such an irrelevant pipe dream.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

You shouldn’t refer to yourself as we. And, no, the city bus system wouldn’t work. Who would want their 5 year old on a bus with a 16 year old? Especially with phones?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

You shouldn’t refer to yourself as we. And, no, the city bus system wouldn’t work. Who would want their 5 year old on a bus with a 16 year old? Especially with phones?

You have no idea how many supporters have already joined Abolish. I’m sure your kid will be fine on the new and improved bus system, don’t worry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

The "we" bit sounds more than a little grandiose. And, yes, it would be incredibly inefficient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

You probably are “serious”. But that doesn’t mean you are correct or offering a viable solution. See Dr. Reid’s proposal to have all 6th graders in middle school as an example of a proposal that is as obviously impossible as yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

You probably are “serious”. But that doesn’t mean you are correct or offering a viable solution. See Dr. Reid’s proposal to have all 6th graders in middle school as an example of a proposal that is as obviously impossible as yours.

The right leader could figure it out. The more DCUM says it won’t work, the more we think it’s a good idea. You wouldn’t be wasting your time responding if you weren’t interested.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

The "we" bit sounds more than a little grandiose. And, yes, it would be incredibly inefficient.

The next time you see a school bus just know Abolish has a plan!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

You probably are “serious”. But that doesn’t mean you are correct or offering a viable solution. See Dr. Reid’s proposal to have all 6th graders in middle school as an example of a proposal that is as obviously impossible as yours.

The right leader could figure it out. The more DCUM says it won’t work, the more we think it’s a good idea. You wouldn’t be wasting your time responding if you weren’t interested.

Sounds like you haven't figured it out. Once you do, propose it. Circulate a petition. Testify at a school board meeting. Gather your forces and go for it.

We’ll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

That's an exercise in sheer inefficiency, and you don't sound serious.

You don’t know that it would be inefficient. Again, just because you disagree doesn’t mean we’re not serious.

You probably are “serious”. But that doesn’t mean you are correct or offering a viable solution. See Dr. Reid’s proposal to have all 6th graders in middle school as an example of a proposal that is as obviously impossible as yours.

The right leader could figure it out. The more DCUM says it won’t work, the more we think it’s a good idea. You wouldn’t be wasting your time responding if you weren’t interested.

Sounds like you haven't figured it out. Once you do, propose it. Circulate a petition. Testify at a school board meeting. Gather your forces and go for it.

We’ll wait.

We are far ahead of you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

You shouldn’t refer to yourself as we. And, no, the city bus system wouldn’t work. Who would want their 5 year old on a bus with a 16 year old? Especially with phones?

You have no idea how many supporters have already joined Abolish. I’m sure your kid will be fine on the new and improved bus system, don’t worry.

DP. Don’t strain yourself too much trying to spew this crap into relevance.

We’ll pay attention when you get at least one school board member signed on to your agenda, which will require you creating an entirely new political party. Maybe you can join Elon’s!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine a system where there were no school boundaries and parents were left to arrange their kids’ transportation, leading to far more cars on the roads and more kids unable to attend the schools close to their homes because they were closed to transfers dropping out.

The same policy types would be advocating for a socialist system where the government pays for buses to transport kids to schools and more kids could walk to school.

Oh wait, we have that already.

Why said there would be no busses in the new plan without boundaries?

Tell us how FCPS can provide buses when there are no boundaries.

Private school kids take public transportation. Public school kids could figure out a school bus system that goes to multiple schools.

Ridiculous suggestion. Far more public school students than private school students (most of whom drive or get driven to school), and buses don't go anywhere most public schools.

This thread is a joke.

Reading comprehension could help you. The school bus system could be retooled to be more like a city bus system and go to certain schools within a region. This really isn’t that hard and just because you disagree doesn’t mean it a joke. We are very serious.

You shouldn’t refer to yourself as we. And, no, the city bus system wouldn’t work. Who would want their 5 year old on a bus with a 16 year old? Especially with phones?

You have no idea how many supporters have already joined Abolish. I’m sure your kid will be fine on the new and improved bus system, don’t worry.

DP. Don’t strain yourself too much trying to spew this crap into relevance.

We’ll pay attention when you get at least one school board member signed on to your agenda, which will require you creating an entirely new political party. Maybe you can join Elon’s!

Abolish is bipartisan and apolitical.