J.D. Vance: A complete black whole of charisma

[Anonymous]

Hillary was NEVER going to win. She had too many people that hated her. And I say this as someone who thinks she is brilliant.

If it was not Obama or Trump it would’ve been another man that would’ve beaten her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary was NEVER going to win. She had too many people that hated her. And I say this as someone who thinks she is brilliant.

If it was not Obama or Trump it would’ve been another man that would’ve beaten her.

Hillary 2016 was a weak candidate at almost 70 years old, with the baggage obtained since 2008, and being Dem after 8 years of a Dem POTUS but, but...... she is not in the same ballpark of awfulness as a POTUS candidate as Trump vs Biden in 2020 and the ghost of Biden vs Trump in 2024. We have never come close to the awfulness presented by our two political parties in 2020 and 2024 and Harris had nothing to do with that awfulness.

[Anonymous]

The Democratic machine has failed us over and over and over.

Obama was not a product of the machine. That is why Hillary ran against him.

Frankly none of the icons of the Democratic Party actually came from the machine. Not Bernie, not AOC, not Zohran. The Democratic machine produces candidates like Biden, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Rahm Emanuel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic machine has failed us over and over and over.

Obama was not a product of the machine. That is why Hillary ran against him.

Frankly none of the icons of the Democratic Party actually came from the machine. Not Bernie, not AOC, not Zohran. The Democratic machine produces candidates like Biden, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Rahm Emanuel.

What are you rambling about? Are you trying to compare Biden to HRC and Obama? Get real. Biden is a joke. Bernie and AOC are political outcasts because they don't play nice with big money (in other words, they are enemies to the GOP and Dem Parties but friends to everyday Americans).

[Anonymous]

It's too bad OP apparently can't spell "hole" correctly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's too bad OP apparently can't spell "hole" correctly.

Perhaps the intended word was “whale.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. I think Trump really will try for a third term. And the way things are going, I think the Supreme Court will let it happen. Even if states like CA and NY refused to put him on the ballot, he could still get an electoral majority.
2. But in the happy event that a third term does not materialize, I am enjoying the schadenfreude of the Rs being in the same position with JD as the Dems were with Kamala, i.e., the VP just isn't all that popular. Though they are slightly better off---the Dems weren't going to dump the Black female VP at the risk of angering the most reliable block of Dem voters---Black women. I don't think the Rs would get that type of blowback. The minute Trump is off the ticket---either because he's incapacitated or loses his third term bid, the R knives will come out for JD.

Interesting question whether weird young white male incels are to the modern GOP what black women are to the Dem party — that core constituency that they cannot afford to alienate. Because JD is clearly the candidate of the weird young white males who can not get dates. They want to grow up to be him with his cute Asian wife and slick slim fit suits and sick burns to own the llibs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. I think Trump really will try for a third term. And the way things are going, I think the Supreme Court will let it happen. Even if states like CA and NY refused to put him on the ballot, he could still get an electoral majority.
2. But in the happy event that a third term does not materialize, I am enjoying the schadenfreude of the Rs being in the same position with JD as the Dems were with Kamala, i.e., the VP just isn't all that popular. Though they are slightly better off---the Dems weren't going to dump the Black female VP at the risk of angering the most reliable block of Dem voters---Black women. I don't think the Rs would get that type of blowback. The minute Trump is off the ticket---either because he's incapacitated or loses his third term bid, the R knives will come out for JD.

Interesting question whether weird young white male incels are to the modern GOP what black women are to the Dem party — that core constituency that they cannot afford to alienate. Because JD is clearly the candidate of the weird young white males who can not get dates. They want to grow up to be him with his cute Asian wife and slick slim fit suits and sick burns to own the llibs.

You know, I'm just going to note that the dripping contempt for white males isn't going to win Democrats any new votes. When you start out with 'weird incels," there's not a lot of space for inclusivity or building a coalition. Every white dude senses the hatred that Democrats are throwing their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. I think Trump really will try for a third term. And the way things are going, I think the Supreme Court will let it happen. Even if states like CA and NY refused to put him on the ballot, he could still get an electoral majority.
2. But in the happy event that a third term does not materialize, I am enjoying the schadenfreude of the Rs being in the same position with JD as the Dems were with Kamala, i.e., the VP just isn't all that popular. Though they are slightly better off---the Dems weren't going to dump the Black female VP at the risk of angering the most reliable block of Dem voters---Black women. I don't think the Rs would get that type of blowback. The minute Trump is off the ticket---either because he's incapacitated or loses his third term bid, the R knives will come out for JD.

Interesting question whether weird young white male incels are to the modern GOP what black women are to the Dem party — that core constituency that they cannot afford to alienate. Because JD is clearly the candidate of the weird young white males who can not get dates. They want to grow up to be him with his cute Asian wife and slick slim fit suits and sick burns to own the llibs.

You know, I'm just going to note that the dripping contempt for white males isn't going to win Democrats any new votes. When you start out with 'weird incels," there's not a lot of space for inclusivity or building a coalition. Every white dude senses the hatred that Democrats are throwing their way.

Are you saying all white males are incels? That’s pretty racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. I think Trump really will try for a third term. And the way things are going, I think the Supreme Court will let it happen. Even if states like CA and NY refused to put him on the ballot, he could still get an electoral majority.
2. But in the happy event that a third term does not materialize, I am enjoying the schadenfreude of the Rs being in the same position with JD as the Dems were with Kamala, i.e., the VP just isn't all that popular. Though they are slightly better off---the Dems weren't going to dump the Black female VP at the risk of angering the most reliable block of Dem voters---Black women. I don't think the Rs would get that type of blowback. The minute Trump is off the ticket---either because he's incapacitated or loses his third term bid, the R knives will come out for JD.

Interesting question whether weird young white male incels are to the modern GOP what black women are to the Dem party — that core constituency that they cannot afford to alienate. Because JD is clearly the candidate of the weird young white males who can not get dates. They want to grow up to be him with his cute Asian wife and slick slim fit suits and sick burns to own the llibs.

When did our bland VP ever own us libs with his sick burns? I must have missed that. I think he and his supporters must be living in some weird fiction of the world.

[Anonymous]

Nobody likes JD Vance, not even his family, certainly not those who bought his soul.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. When the country is angry and divided, which it has been for a while, the middle will vote for THE OTHER PARTY. Of course I hope the Democrats produce a good and admirable candidate, one that can bring us together. But it doesn't matter. No matter how awful, the candidate not associated with the current $hit$how will win. It is what happened in 2020 and 2024 and it's what will happen in 2028.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary was NEVER going to win. She had too many people that hated her. And I say this as someone who thinks she is brilliant.

If it was not Obama or Trump it would’ve been another man that would’ve beaten her.

Hillary 2016 was a weak candidate at almost 70 years old, with the baggage obtained since 2008, and being Dem after 8 years of a Dem POTUS but, but...... she is not in the same ballpark of awfulness as a POTUS candidate as Trump vs Biden in 2020 and the ghost of Biden vs Trump in 2024. We have never come close to the awfulness presented by our two political parties in 2020 and 2024 and Harris had nothing to do with that awfulness.

Hillary wanted to expand H1B program and replace US workers with hundreds of thousands of guest workers.

https://youtu.be/AOW0cUaGWZU

3 Supreme Court picks lost because Hillary lost to an idiot like Trump!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary was NEVER going to win. She had too many people that hated her. And I say this as someone who thinks she is brilliant.

If it was not Obama or Trump it would’ve been another man that would’ve beaten her.

Hillary 2016 was a weak candidate at almost 70 years old, with the baggage obtained since 2008, and being Dem after 8 years of a Dem POTUS but, but...... she is not in the same ballpark of awfulness as a POTUS candidate as Trump vs Biden in 2020 and the ghost of Biden vs Trump in 2024. We have never come close to the awfulness presented by our two political parties in 2020 and 2024 and Harris had nothing to do with that awfulness.

3 Supreme Court picks lost because Hillary lost to an idiot like Trump!!!

More proof JD has so little charisma he can’t even be the topic of his own thread!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary was NEVER going to win. She had too many people that hated her. And I say this as someone who thinks she is brilliant.

If it was not Obama or Trump it would’ve been another man that would’ve beaten her.

Hillary 2016 was a weak candidate at almost 70 years old, with the baggage obtained since 2008, and being Dem after 8 years of a Dem POTUS but, but...... she is not in the same ballpark of awfulness as a POTUS candidate as Trump vs Biden in 2020 and the ghost of Biden vs Trump in 2024. We have never come close to the awfulness presented by our two political parties in 2020 and 2024 and Harris had nothing to do with that awfulness.

3 Supreme Court picks lost because Hillary lost to an idiot like Trump!!!

More proof JD has so little charisma he can’t even be the topic of his own thread!

So true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you expect the democrats to put forward in 2028? As we’ve seen, the opponent matters.

Gavin and he’s gonna wipe the floor with the Hillbilly

He’s got baggage galore. Previously married to Kimberly Guilfoyle, cheated on her with his best friend’s wife, can’t get his story straight on trans issues, turned CA cities into drug-infested homeless camps, in charge for multiple horrific fires, the list goes on. If that’s the best democrats can come up with, Vance is most likely to be our next president.

Did he really cheat with his best friend’s wife or is this one of MAGA rumors. Was it ever confirmed?

Alex Tourk was a campaign manager for Gavin Newsom whose resignation in 2007 stemmed from the revelation that Newsom had an affair with his wife, Ruby Rippey-Tourk. Tourk, a close friend and aide to Newsom, had overseen the mayor's first re-election campaign.

With the current occupant of 6100, I think we can safely presume that voters DO NOT CARE.

Y’all are so naive. Voters will absolutely care when it’s a Democrat in question.

It's not Newsom's infidelity that will prevent him from winning.
It's his policies. He ruined SF and went on to ruin all of California. Homelessness, lack of fire mitigation, providing all kinds of assistance to illegal aliens, huge budgetary issues...... these are just a few of the many issues that any Republican will hit him with. And, he is very deserving of the criticism.

It's cute that you think elections are about policies and records anymore. Presidential elections have sadly degenerated into who can post the sickest memes and "PWN" the other side and so far, Newsom is one of the only Democrats of national stature who seems to get that.