Do MAGAs want a Christian Nation or a Free Nation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rather have a Christian nation than an Islamic one. Secularism is too fractured to stand up religious forces.

So if a religion is going to take over I’d rather it be Christianity than Islam. I really wish atheists would stop attacking Christianity because they are doing the work of the extreme islamists.

No one is attacking Christianity. We want true freedom of religion. Do you not want freedom?

An atheist is a theist whose god’s name is Chance.

They don’t want freedom of religion. They want their god to be worshipped by all.

Actually do want freedom of religion. You do you (sounds like you do not like freedom though).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

I asked, and no-one could come up with any benefits to working for an Islamist. They have history of being poor employers in their home countries and only recently gave up slavery.

I don't want those job opportunities. If I had to do it again, I would not have taken the job I had working for Islamists knowing now they don't believe in Sunday's or Christmas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

I asked, and no-one could come up with any benefits to working for an Islamist. They have history of being poor employers in their home countries and only recently gave up slavery.

I don't want those job opportunities. If I had to do it again, I would not have taken the job I had working for Islamists knowing now they don't believe in Sunday's or Christmas.

Hey, I wouldn't want to work for a far right Christian Nationalist who believes women are subservient to men, such as Charlie Kirk or Pete Hegseth.

In jobs with year round work requirements such as healthcare, religious diversity is an asset as no, you can't just automatically get Sundays or Christian holidays off; adequate staffing takes priority.

Your kind Islamic or Jewish or atheist colleagues might offer to trade shifts with you though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

There are very few true atheists, but a lot of lazy people that don’t want to render unto God what is God’s.

Those people can live off the fruits of their forefathers for a time, but things decay over time.

What you perhaps actually like is to live off the accumulated social capital without having to do anything yourself to maintain it. Much like some people like to live off inherited wealth without having to work hard. That certainly can be appealing.

This is why I’m poking you to name a truly non-Christian nation that meets your definition of freedom. Because such a thing cannot exist without generations of Christians doing the hard work.

DP...I didn't have to look very far because Canada is a non-Christian nation that meets my definition of freedom.

They seem to be attempting to make the point that many free nations historically were founded by Christians, so they can only attribute their success to that and not other things like basic evolution of human intelligence, ability for empathy, and level of education. Ultimately it is a giant correlation argument. Nevermind that atheists are "lazy."

The hilarious part is that the ideals that make nations free, such as individual liberty, reason, natural rights, and freedom of the press, speech, and religion, came from Enlightenment thinkers. Who were fiercely opposed by Christians.

The enlightenment itself is the outcome of a Christian society and Christian beliefs, notably about truth.

I’m an atheist but it pretty undisputable that Christian morality and belief is the cornerstone to western civilization. I’m not looking forward to the day when our society inevitably becomes either completely repaganized; conquered by the Islamicists or technologists.

The Enlightenment was a critique of Christianity, not an outgrowth of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

I asked, and no-one could come up with any benefits to working for an Islamist. They have history of being poor employers in their home countries and only recently gave up slavery.

I don't want those job opportunities. If I had to do it again, I would not have taken the job I had working for Islamists knowing now they don't believe in Sunday's or Christmas.

Hey, I wouldn't want to work for a far right Christian Nationalist who believes women are subservient to men, such as Charlie Kirk or Pete Hegseth.

In jobs with year round work requirements such as healthcare, religious diversity is an asset as no, you can't just automatically get Sundays or Christian holidays off; adequate staffing takes priority.

Your kind Islamic or Jewish or atheist colleagues might offer to trade shifts with you though.

You're not very good at this are you? Well, I guess you can get an abortion in Islam countries. So, there is that liberty. I wonder why women aren't running off to emigrate to those countries. Maybe they don't like their fashion sense.

Of course you wouldn't see it my way. That's the situation. Take a job with an Islamist, and they won't think Oh, it's Christmas, we'll have to manage to get people time off. They just won't do it. Then when Ramdan rolls around, oops they'll conveniently forget, oh but you aren't Islam you don't mind working that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

I asked, and no-one could come up with any benefits to working for an Islamist. They have history of being poor employers in their home countries and only recently gave up slavery.

I don't want those job opportunities. If I had to do it again, I would not have taken the job I had working for Islamists knowing now they don't believe in Sunday's or Christmas.

Hey, I wouldn't want to work for a far right Christian Nationalist who believes women are subservient to men, such as Charlie Kirk or Pete Hegseth.

In jobs with year round work requirements such as healthcare, religious diversity is an asset as no, you can't just automatically get Sundays or Christian holidays off; adequate staffing takes priority.

Your kind Islamic or Jewish or atheist colleagues might offer to trade shifts with you though.

You're not very good at this are you? Well, I guess you can get an abortion in Islam countries. So, there is that liberty. I wonder why women aren't running off to emigrate to those countries. Maybe they don't like their fashion sense.

Of course you wouldn't see it my way. That's the situation. Take a job with an Islamist, and they won't think Oh, it's Christmas, we'll have to manage to get people time off. They just won't do it. Then when Ramdan rolls around, oops they'll conveniently forget, oh but you aren't Islam you don't mind working that.

You sound anxious. Perhaps see a therapist. Or pray, whatever works for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweden, Denmark, high proportion atheist population. Not all of Europe is so religious.

Denmark is a high trust society. mostly because it is homogeneous.

https://www.helenrussell.co.uk/books/the-year-of-living-danishly/

now in the US diversity means 80% Indians in IT and a token white person.

but to progressives that is ok.

Australia, also high atheist population, also diverse.

You guys keep citing Christian countries. Where are your non-Christian examples? You know the places that never were Christian… Surely you must have at least one paradise where no one celebrates Christmas.

*Uh not really. Not if the majority of a country is atheist. It is more about FREE countries. With true religious freedom, there will probably be some celebration if Christmas and other religion holidays. We don't want forced atheism either. Just freedom.

I'm pretty sure atheist countries suck the (looking at China).

The thing is all these religions have embedded in them social hierarchies and sort of rules of the road as to how people in various classes are to be treated, which is pretty much absent in atheism.

I think it's instructive but many religions consist almost exclusively of elite, but others are popular amongst the masses. Judaism is good example of this where are the poor Jews, I think most just leave (not to pick sides because Muslim countries are known to treat workers the worst.) I'm reminded of the Hannakah festival where the Rabbi made a point to call out every politician and or wealthy entity in attendance.

Anymore when interviewing I'm careful to read the religious vibes, and I'm not even a woman. The preference is for defacto American religion, that celebrates federal holiday's and days off.

There is a difference between a nation that requires atheism and restricts religion, vs one which allows freedom and happens to end up with a large number of agnostics/atheists

The freedom is the difference and the key to success.

For the rest of your comment, you sound awful and prejudiced and isolated. I hire a lot of people and their religion does not factor into it!

How many Muslims do you work for? Put some skin in the game! You sound aweful not realizing that people in the same class as you who hold religious beliefs will not treat people fairly in many cases.

And here we had a Christian earlier in this thread admit they suss out religious beliefs in interviews to avoid those who don't celebrate Christian holidays

Can you name one benefit to working for an Islamist if you aren't belonging to Islam. They only recently quit treating such people as slaves.

If you can't imagine that perspective don't bother arguing.

Name one thing that's good about working for an Islamist from a non-Muslim point of view.

I have employed many on a hospital unit. Fantastic team players, caregivers, kind, humble, and willing to work Christian holidays and Sundays. Honestly, the devout Christians can make healthcare staffing a pain.

You can't even hit the right perspective. I wouldn't want to go to you for medical treatment.

It's ok, I wouldn't want to work for you as you admit you break the law and discriminate when hiring. Nobody wants a boss who doesn't follow the law. You also, frankly, sound weird.

You and your perspectives again. It's not against the law for an interviewee. I have no obligation to take a job from an Islamist.

It literally is against the law to discriminate based on religion during the hiring process. Are you really this dumb?

https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices

That is only for employers.

Ok well discriminate away and limit your job opportunities, weirdo.

I asked, and no-one could come up with any benefits to working for an Islamist. They have history of being poor employers in their home countries and only recently gave up slavery.

I don't want those job opportunities. If I had to do it again, I would not have taken the job I had working for Islamists knowing now they don't believe in Sunday's or Christmas.

Hey, I wouldn't want to work for a far right Christian Nationalist who believes women are subservient to men, such as Charlie Kirk or Pete Hegseth.

In jobs with year round work requirements such as healthcare, religious diversity is an asset as no, you can't just automatically get Sundays or Christian holidays off; adequate staffing takes priority.

Your kind Islamic or Jewish or atheist colleagues might offer to trade shifts with you though.

You're not very good at this are you? Well, I guess you can get an abortion in Islam countries. So, there is that liberty. I wonder why women aren't running off to emigrate to those countries. Maybe they don't like their fashion sense.

Of course you wouldn't see it my way. That's the situation. Take a job with an Islamist, and they won't think Oh, it's Christmas, we'll have to manage to get people time off. They just won't do it. Then when Ramdan rolls around, oops they'll conveniently forget, oh but you aren't Islam you don't mind working that.

You sound anxious. Perhaps see a therapist. Or pray, whatever works for you.

I know the Indians have been leaving trinkets at their Visa god's temple, I guess we can all agree to relieve our own anxieties. My satisfaction is taking as many PERM interviews as possible.