Sorry, can someone explain Sydney Sweeney to me?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently she was valedictorian of her high school class.

I underestimated her since her boobs are everywhere but she knows what she's doing, trying to cash in as much as she can while being America's version of blonde-ish hot girl representing MAGA....

lol. She went to a fake high school for child actors. 100 kids total.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently she was valedictorian of her high school class.

I underestimated her since her boobs are everywhere but she knows what she's doing, trying to cash in as much as she can while being America's version of blonde-ish hot girl representing MAGA....

Cite a source on that. Sounds like total BS.

She said it publicly so many times. It would have been easily refuted if she were lying. Women can have large boobs and brains.

There were 200 Valedictorians in my kid’s senior class. It doesn’t mean what it used to mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When nice boobs are attached to an ugly face, the boobs somehow seem more attractive than they really are.

Yes. It’s a juxtaposition.

Classic Butter Face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

It’s the boobs combined with the jaded, vacant expression she always seems to have. There’s a strange hypnotic pull to some. And I think she is a better actress than most give her credit for, I thought she was really good on White Lotus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought she was terrible in White Lotus. Her character was unlikeable, not funny at all (unlike the actors who played her parents) and just really one-dimensional. She was not pretty either, so I don't even know why she was casted for White Lotus, which is an amazing series (despite Sydney being in the first season).

Hard disagree. The whole point of the character was that she was awful and mean but that there was still a clueless, immature, yet fundamentally non-evil little girl beneath all that and I thought she nailed it. I also thought she was hysterical, the humor was just very dry.

[Anonymous]

I think she has "it". I first saw her, never having heard of her, in this horrible movie called The Voyeurs a few years ago and she absolutely stood out despite how bad the movie was. That's a quality people have or don't have regardless of their good/bad/exceptional looks.

[Anonymous]

She was outstanding (and very plain looking)in The Handmaid's Tale

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about you being confused about America's Butterface

What don't you understand about boobs?

She also has nice looking skin.

I'm just not familiar with her work and was wondering if that awesome rack also delivered some really compelling acting performances that woudl be worth checking out, but apparenlty, it just delivers really compelling boobs.

I enjoy her work. She started as this devout lady in handmaids tail and was super convincing, then she played substance abuse girl in sharp objects. In Euphoria she played a high school bimbo and she did her homework with the characters, good use of micro facial expressions too. I really like her and she is so much better than the start nepo babies in Hollywood.

Boobs are a plus, I still like her without the boobs (hypothetically).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is alright. Cute girl, not extremely impressed with her acting but she is alright. I don’t foresee her having a long serious acting career but most people don’t. Reminds me of a Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, or Megan Fox. I enjoy these actresses films but I don’t go in with high acting expectations. She is the pretty girl of the time period. Good to look at on screen, not too many serious roles but will come and go with a lot of money. Good enough for most people.

Even with a short career Megan fox managed to gather 5mm net worth. More than I can make in a life time.

[Anonymous]

The real question is what is going on with her connection to the Bezos

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real question is what is going on with her connection to the Bezos

They like big boobs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is alright. Cute girl, not extremely impressed with her acting but she is alright. I don’t foresee her having a long serious acting career but most people don’t. Reminds me of a Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, or Megan Fox. I enjoy these actresses films but I don’t go in with high acting expectations. She is the pretty girl of the time period. Good to look at on screen, not too many serious roles but will come and go with a lot of money. Good enough for most people.

Sweeney is already far more successful and has exponentially more "it factor" than Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, or Megan Fox. Alba is only rich because she got lucky being a do-nothing front woman for Honest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she has "it". I first saw her, never having heard of her, in this horrible movie called The Voyeurs a few years ago and she absolutely stood out despite how bad the movie was. That's a quality people have or don't have regardless of their good/bad/exceptional looks.

Yep. She pops off the screen when she does interviews. She's magnetic and extremely charming / charismatic. She's mastered that flirty cute confident girl next door disposition everyone loves. Most gals as pretty as her you want to hate because they seem like mean girls. You don't get that with her because she's got a one in a million personality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is alright. Cute girl, not extremely impressed with her acting but she is alright. I don’t foresee her having a long serious acting career but most people don’t. Reminds me of a Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, or Megan Fox. I enjoy these actresses films but I don’t go in with high acting expectations. She is the pretty girl of the time period. Good to look at on screen, not too many serious roles but will come and go with a lot of money. Good enough for most people.

Sweeney is already far more successful and has exponentially more "it factor" than Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, or Megan Fox. Alba is only rich because she got lucky being a do-nothing front woman for Honest.

NP. By any metric, Alba is more successful.

[Anonymous]

She's just the shiksa du jour being passed around Hollywood right now.