|
I can see why men would like her. But, she is pretty average. Nothing special and I don't know what people see in her specifically. It's not like there is no other celebrity or regular woman in America who looks better.
And the previous poster who says she looks better than the "average American" is comparing her using low standards because I'm sure if the they had the money and resources, they would be on the same level as her. |
|
She could easily be a modern-day Marilyn Monroe.
|
No she can't. Marilyn was beautiful. |
The amazing thing about Sydney Sweeney is that she looks exactly the same if you put a paper bag over her head. |
As I posted above, you cannot be a box office success by appealing just to men. |
and voluptuous. |
That's easy to say now. At the time you'd probably say "stupid and bad actress". |
+1000 |
+1. Sydney is no where near as voluptuous as Marilyn. |
With all the makeup, dye job, buster, and corset. Without all of that help she was pretty plain looking. |
I haven't seen her with a paper bag over head, but I'd imagine that she'd look better wearing one. |
But not as plain as Sydney. |
Why don't you do a side by side so we can all see? Sydney has a much more natural look so we know what she looks like already. Marilyn was unrecognizable in her natural state. |
| For 30 years Hollywood has brainwashed the virtue signaling masses that ugly mannish women like Zendaya and obese women like the Kardashians are hot. It’s not surprising men genuinely find a flirty and fertile blonde with big boobs hot. |
|
I don’t get her appeal except for her generous proportions upstairs, but that’s not even unusual. I only ever saw her in White Lotus, maybe that’s the characterization of her that somehow unofficially sticks with me.
I’m not her target audience, tho |