Sorry, can someone explain Sydney Sweeney to me?

[Anonymous]

Her face/eyes are going to age so poorly. She already looks tired and old. (if you're paying attention to her face)

[Anonymous]

I am not a fan of hers at all, but I thought she was really good in The Handmaid’s Tale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her face/eyes are going to age so poorly. She already looks tired and old. (if you're paying attention to her face)

I've known that to happen to a lot of people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

she's also blonde.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Immaculate and Echo Valley--she is amazing in both. Immaculate is a solid horror entry--she plays a nun, so no breasts. Echo Valley is les good, but she is a strung out, rageful, hideously awful daughter.

Another insane performance. And supposedly her new one as the boxer is a great performance in a blah movie.

The girl has talent and I can't stand when people reduce women to their defining physical feature, even if I do not like HER personally.

This thread is so gross. Rack. Boobs. Vacant eyes. Demeaning and dehumanizing.

OP, and okay you’ve convinced me to check some things out… but i was genuinely shocked by all the publicity photos of her are so boob oriented.

You have mentioned her boobs on every post you made in this thread. Are they really that fascinating to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about you being confused about America's Butterface

What don't you understand about boobs?

She also has nice looking skin.

So some seem to think. Hence the genes commercial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about you being confused about America's Butterface

What don't you understand about boobs?

She also has nice looking skin.

Is that a Butterface? It's not bad... it just looks extremely vacant. She seems to struggle with closing her mouth completely.

She has the face of a Real Doll or a heroin junkie and I guess pornification has made that attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

Have you met many men in your lifetime thus far?

Blank faced with BOOBIES is pretty much the dream come true for most of them - #notallmen, of course!

[Anonymous]

I have seen her in a few things where she is not taking her clothes off and she is very good in them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fetal alcohol syndrome

Look, I’m tired of her being forced down our throats too but she’d be the classic gorgeous “top tier” sorority girl at any major university. All the rich boys and top student-athlete boys would be trying to date her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Immaculate and Echo Valley--she is amazing in both. Immaculate is a solid horror entry--she plays a nun, so no breasts. Echo Valley is les good, but she is a strung out, rageful, hideously awful daughter.

Another insane performance. And supposedly her new one as the boxer is a great performance in a blah movie.

The girl has talent and I can't stand when people reduce women to their defining physical feature, even if I do not like HER personally.

This thread is so gross. Rack. Boobs. Vacant eyes. Demeaning and dehumanizing.

OP, and okay you’ve convinced me to check some things out… but i was genuinely shocked by all the publicity photos of her are so boob oriented.

You have mentioned her boobs on every post you made in this thread. Are they really that fascinating to you?

Yes, the thread is abotu whether she is about more than just her fantastic physical appearance.

And I dare you to go look for ANY publicity photo of her where her breasts are not literally and figuratively the center of the photo.

Seriously, this is the first thing that came up in my google search: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/sydney-sweeney-puts-divisive-twist-171159665.html

That's not how most actresses dress!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

Posting this and starting the thread when you basically say you haven't even seen her act is questionable (OP looks far worse than society ).

[Anonymous]

She has a great body. Men interpret the so-called dead eyes as sultry. 🤷🏼‍♀️

[Anonymous]

She has great jeans, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't watch Euphoria and White Lotus, but when I look her up, literally every picture of her is just ALL boobs. And they're nice boobs. But her entire public persona seems to be: boobs, you like them, don't you?

I guess that's okay, but her face always seems very blank... is it just her body that makes her the star she apparently is? And I know Hollywood over-sexualizes a lot of female actresses and she's not the only celebrity who arguably is all about the body, but she seems REALLY just a pair of boobs that everyone is captivated by...

Posting this and starting the thread when you basically say you haven't even seen her act is questionable (OP looks far worse than society ).

The subject is literally: "Sorry, can someone explain Sydney Sweeney to me?"

What's questionable... OP has never seen her act, wants to know if it's worth it or if she's just some sex symbol.