WH announces construction of 90,000 sq foot ballroom to WH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ballroom is evidence America has eclipsed France culturally, even in cuisine, because France does not have BBQ. I would say America has entered a new Gilded Age, eclipsing all of Europe which stands like a waif in our shadow.

A massive BBQ smoker grill should be installed and then there would be some real parties going on in there.

They should make the entire ballroom Dukes of Hazzard themed to really top it off.

Hall of Inbreeding?

Some topless oil paintings of Ivanka in Daisy Dukes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.

Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.

Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.

It’s a graft.

It’s also the peoples house, not trumps personal hillbilly hunting lodge.

[Anonymous]

Trump had the famed Rose Garden ripped up for this concrete monstrosity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump had the famed Rose Garden ripped up for this concrete monstrosity.

Easy enough to fix. A future President will revert this back to a lawn.

[Anonymous]

The ballroom looks like something out of the kremlin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.

Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.

Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.

DP. You think future administrations will want to make use of the gilded monstrosity that Donald Trump created? It's the "People's House," not "Mar-a-Lago."

[Anonymous]

Such a lovely addition to the White House, and a great way for the Best President in American History to cement his legacy as a hero to the American People.

His taste is fantastic, I love all of the well thought out, classy touches, and the fact it exudes power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have to go back more than 60 years for precedent, you are losing the argument.

Also, if you cannot tell the difference between a first lady beautification initiative and Trump's ego, I don't know what to tell you.

Ah, so you're incensed because you think this kind of thing is... a woman's job? Specifically, the First Lady? Get over yourself. This is being paid for entirely with private funds and will benefit all future administrations.

As a taxpayer, I’m not getting the “benefit” here.

Much larger capacity than the current hosting room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Such a lovely addition to the White House, and a great way for the Best President in American History to cement his legacy as a hero to the American People.

His taste is fantastic, I love all of the well thought out, classy touches, and the fact it exudes power.

The American People won’t be allowed to ever go inside of that. Trump sure is a man of the people huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Such a lovely addition to the White House, and a great way for the Best President in American History to cement his legacy as a hero to the American People.

His taste is fantastic, I love all of the well thought out, classy touches, and the fact it exudes power.

lol…yes, when you think Trump, you definitely think “class.”

[Anonymous]

Still not distracting us from the Epstein files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.

"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Aka this is a place to park bribes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.

"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Are you actually stupid enough to believe these donors aren’t getting paid back and then some with special favors?

Or remember how he said Mexico was going to pay for the border wall? He’s not very credible when it comes to who is paying for what. I mean, even when he was building casinos he didn’t pay for things he said he would pay for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's so funny - and typical - that none of you acknowledge this is being built using private funds. It will also benefit all the presidents to come. Not taxpayer funded at all. Idiots.

"Leavitt characterized the new construction — which she said will be funded by Trump and other private donors"

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/construction-on-trump-s-200-million-white-house-ballroom-to-begin-in-september/ar-AA1JFKsY?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Buying favor you absolute idiot! Bribes !

Wth is wrong with you!

[Anonymous]

I walk by the White House frequentlvand I’m still having trouble picturing this. What is in the space now that there are going to lose? Seems like it will also be a heating/cooling disaster for future admins.