Carla Hayden - Librarian of Congress fired by Trump

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was in her job for eight years. The first woman and the first Black to hold the position. I think we all know why she was fired.


I fo know.

She was fired because she was an unqualified another DEI hire who stole the position from more qualified persons.


I know I should be used to this, but as a highly educated successful black woman, this is exhausting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes indeed. Thanks for noticing the Copyright Office firing. Copyright sounds boring but there are billyuns and billyuns at stake. Remember Elmo owns xAI.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/11/white-house-copyright-office-director-fired/


Elmo is really taking over the country. Is he working pretty much alone? I wonder how he gets so many people under his spell when he has the personality of a wall.



If there is any justice left in America there will be a firing squad in his future.
Anonymous
I find it sad and pathetic that no MAGA or GOP members know or understand the purpose of the Library of Congress.

These fools really believe that Little Suzie, age 8, can stroll in after school and check out Desire: An Inclusive Guide to Navigating Libido Differences in Relationships or The GayBCs.

Y'all need to educate yourselves. It's not woke to be educated.
Anonymous
and now a total unqualified lackey has been appointed.

#winning
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was in her job for eight years. The first woman and the first Black to hold the position. I think we all know why she was fired.


I fo know.

She was fired because she was an unqualified another DEI hire who stole the position from more qualified persons.


She had a Ph.D. in Library Science. She was replaced by Trump's former attorney with absolutely NO experience.

But...she was the dei hire. Y'all make this easy.

Thank you for proving how dumb your entire DEI arguments were.

Yeah, she stole the job from "qualified" persons.

You cannot make this up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was in her job for eight years. The first woman and the first Black to hold the position. I think we all know why she was fired.


I fo know.

She was fired because she was an unqualified another DEI hire who stole the position from more qualified persons.


She had a Ph.D. in Library Science. She was replaced by Trump's former attorney with absolutely NO experience.

But...she was the dei hire. Y'all make this easy.

Thank you for proving how dumb your entire DEI arguments were.

Yeah, she stole the job from "qualified" persons.

You cannot make this up.


Yes, the white male acting director is one of Trump’s criminal defense attorneys. Which means that he has probably visited a library at least once at some point. This is what it looks like when people are hired based on who they know rather than on what they know.

Anonymous
Bye! Write when you get there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bye! Write when you get there.


WUT?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I find it sad and pathetic that no MAGA or GOP members know or understand the purpose of the Library of Congress.

These fools really believe that Little Suzie, age 8, can stroll in after school and check out Desire: An Inclusive Guide to Navigating Libido Differences in Relationships or The GayBCs.

Y'all need to educate yourselves. It's not woke to be educated.


I think that any kind of knowledge or expertise is viewed as woke these days. Ignorance is strength.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’ll find something else if she’s so good. Cleaning house is necessary.


How is this cleaning house?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.


What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead


What is very old. She's not very old.


She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.


Nobody wants to live in a coubtry where those two qualifications guarantee life tenure.


She was qualified because she was qualified. She just happens to be a black woman. What are you talking about. Based on Trump's hires, she was competent which makes her bad. Oh, and she doesn't look like a plastic barbie.


DP. You are missing PP’s point. PP was responding to someone who was saying she was qualified for her job because she was a woman and black. And honestly, if you say someone is a woman and black, that doesn’t tell you at all if they are qualified. It might even make you think they are more likely than not NOT qualified, and instead were hired for a quota.

In this case, it sounds like this person was qualified and that she was only fired due to politics. I think that is a shame.


I think you can't read. No one said "she was qualified for her job because she was a woman and black." No one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She was in her job for eight years. The first woman and the first Black to hold the position. I think we all know why she was fired.


I fo know.

She was fired because she was an unqualified another DEI hire who stole the position from more qualified persons.


I know I should be used to this, but as a highly educated successful black woman, this is exhausting.


While it really can feel like Same Old, Same Old, and it is, indeed, exhausting, please don’t let yourself get used to this. The PP that you’re responding to doesn’t deserve even a smidgen of your emotional energy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:and now a total unqualified lackey has been appointed.

#winning


MAGA meritocracy. Fire the highly qualified black woman and replace her with a totally unqualified white man who is totally loyal to trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just one cruel, racist, misogynist flex after another.

It's really a bad idea to put attention-guzzling sociopaths in charge of governments.


What exactly is racist and misogynistic about this? She's also very old and should retire to let millennials and younger lead


What is very old. She's not very old.


She was one of the younger Librarians of Congress we've had. And the first actual qualified Librarian to have the post.

What she is, is female and black.

And racist.
Anonymous
Look at this utter and complete clown Karoline Leavitt not even understanding that the Library of Congress is a research library, it's nothing like a local neighborhood library with unsupervised children running around in it.

She falsely claimed Hayden "put inappropriate books out for children."

Shameless brazen LIAR.

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: