We need somebody very rich
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| The MAGA gaslighters are representing on this thread. |
Anonymous
That's soooooooooooo funny!! 
The Russians bought him ages ago. Musk bought him. Zuckerberg, Bezos bought him. Anyone rich enough can buy him! Look at all his crooked zillionaire appointees! You sure are funny, PP!!
|
Anonymous
| They need to tax corporations’ profits. |
Anonymous
Soros has done so much more than that. I respect him. Musk is a weirdo and has not achieved all that much; he just hires smart people who do. His cars are so ugly too. I recently drove an electric BMW in Europe. Now THAT is an electric car I would own. |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
the Democrats HATE Berne. look, the dems may have switched values/poliocy positions since they switched constituancies with the Republicans but their founder was Andrew Jackson and the party machine has never altered how it functions since the old corript tammany hall days. ask anyone who lives in IL- and the WI,MI, ohio indiana voters who are chicago adjacent. the rebulican party took in the kkk but they were founded by lincoln (our greatest president) and they until now they ran the party along those lines. hence- when trump emerged as the voters choice they let the voters choose, when the voters started choosing bernie- the dem machine panicked. the names of the parties are the clue- R are actually very responsive to voters, D believe they are there to educate and guide the unwashed illiterati (both names are opposite of party philosophy) |
Anonymous
No they don't. and even if they were luke warm to him before, now they are loving him. and ha ha ha. The party of Lincoln became the tool of the rich under Grant and stayed there up through Trump. maybe it will change someday. |
Anonymous
Check out that Walmart heiress. She’s a lifelong Democrat. |
Anonymous
Why aren’t Alex and Huma stepping up?? |
Anonymous
Or, how about a grass roots campaign with 100 million Americans who hate this administration contribute $20.00 which iswould equal one billion dollars! Hell, I would pony up $100? |
Anonymous
| Somebody needs to run the Tufts student being abducted by masked “ICE” agents on public billboard videos throughout the land. |
Anonymous
|
I think someone very rich needs to set up an operation to fight the republicans on every level.
1. Launch Dominion style lawsuits against ever far right media outlet peddling lies. Every last one. Go after huge settlements until the right wing media either stops lying or is bankrupt. 2. Launch a data driven operations center for elections and nominations. Build databases and dossiers. Dig dirt on every candidate. Find out who is funding EVERY candidate, and what associations and afflilations they have. If even one single penny comes from Musk or anyone MAGA, if they even smell the slightest bit MAGA put it on blast with election-time billboards and ads, smear that candidate with every wrong that MAGA ever concieved, NO MATTER WHAT they claim their position is. MAGA cannot be trusted, they have proven themselves to be liars. We can never again support anyone MAGA, anyone backed by Musk. Screw Musk and his threats to primary candidates that don't follow his agenda. He has money but he doesn't have votes. They LIED about our candidates, we need to go on attack 3. Launch massive bot farms to counter right wing social media and other online influence, as well as Russian and Chinese and other foreign influence. Expose their lies. Hound the accounts that post that garbage as fraudsters and liars. Mock and ridicule them. Given the other side has already been doing this for years, it's long past due time for the us to fight fire with fire. |
Anonymous
Yeah, they criticize Republicans for being "a republic", but Republicans at the state level are very active in a democratic fashion. The Republican machinery is adept at spreading a consistent policy through the states, without the federal government, eg the provide "play books" that local government can use to enact similar legislation in multiple states democratically. It makes them more responsive, because democracy is more responsive on a small scale at the state level. Democrats don't do this very well and tend to want federal legislation and bureaucracy which have two problems A) You're voting will is much more diluted. B) The bureaucracy has little feedback from the electorate but is very responsive to special interests. It's amazing to me how similar conceptually slavery and the Spanish encomienda system was to the southern Democrats and Californian Spanish that it is to the modern tech industry. They really *really* want to use marginalized peoples for cheap labor. It's taken as a given in Democrat circles that this is a good thing, even though just as in Mississippi where one slave holder accounted for 90% of the slaves, very few benefit from the cheap labor at scale. Except maybe in a "consumerism" fashion, but if you can't afford to buy anything you can't afford to buy anything. |
Anonymous
Perhaps the best thing that happened to America is having a President who is married to a woman who survived living under Communist control. They both understand how there’s nothing more essential then fighting for our Republic, thus resisting the current wave of the Democrat Marxism. |
Anonymous
| The Lincoln Project needs to step up their game. |