I really had to laugh at your obtuse post. Here are just some of the many other schools that are TO. All filled with average kids, per your “logic.” Carnegie Mellon Boston University Columbia Duke Johns Hopkins Cornell Princeton UPenn Amherst UVA W&M |
+1 The PP is the usual JMU-basher who has a major axe to grind when it comes to the school. At this point, she’s just a sour grapes troll. |
Except no one is trying to do that here, you twit. The kids at JMU are indeed, smart, well-rounded, and nice and have successful post-grad opportunities. Sorry that triggers you, but it’s really just a you problem. DP |
+2 Same experience with my two grads. Very happy with the school. |
Okay, their students are definitely mediocre compared to whichever school you attended. Feel better now? ![]() |
Parent of a kid at JMU and one at another more selective state school. I think they are both getting good educations and will have good outcomes. However, the JMU kid loves the school so much; the other one is more meh about their school.
Not the classes but the level of support. |
I’m a UVA alum who is subtly steering my own kid in this direction for this reason. My friends who went to JMU all seemed much happier, and the other kids there seemed nicer in general. And they’re all happy, gainfully employed adults now, many outearning me considerably. |
Hmmm...well, actually most of the schools above have a majority of accepted applicants that submit tests (with JHU requiring tests next year)...and the ones that do submit create an insane SAT range. So, perhaps you may reconsider your thinking when JMU has only 26% submitting and of that 26% the range is 1180 to 1310. Compare that to say...JHU which has 55% submitting and an SAT range of 1530 to 1560. Or let's compare that to Princeton that has 77% of admitted students submitting with an SAT range of 1510 to 1560. |
Who's the weirdo who can't stand people saying great things about JMU? Don't you have a ranking list thread to busy yourself with? |