There is no reason for someone in PP's situation to have to do ongoing research and watching and managing of their portfolio. Spend a few hours with a plan-only advisor to come up with a long run asset allocation. Vast majority of people can accomplish that with 3 funds or ETFs (total stock market, total international and total bond). Basically you are just deciding on what percentages to put into each. That's a one time decision, and maybe it becomes more conservative over time. That's why many people go into target retirement funds, because it automates all of this. After that is decided, map out how to get there (more complicated for OP because of having to move accounts, sell holdings, tax implications, etc). After that initial work, you really shouldn't be touching anything except maybe a yearly exercise where you rebalance to make sure you are hitting your target allocations. Again this is why target retirement funds are a good option for.many people, because they do this automatically. The vast majority of people shouldn't be consistently researching or watching their portfolio. It almost always induces bad trades which end up costing you money long-term and induce higher taxes. We are talking maybe 3 hours of getting documents and sitting down with an advisor. Then probably an hour here and there for a few months to execute the transition plan. After that like an hour a year. |
All money market funds are like cash so don't worry about finding the same fund at Schwab. Their unit value doesn't change and any income is paid out as interest. When you do move, it's almost like moving cash. |
This is the beauty of index funds. You don't need to manage them if you are investing for the long-run. You do need to decide on your asset allocation between stocks and bonds, though at OP's age if she doesn't need the funds for anything other than retirement she could go all equity for another 15 to 20 years. Aggressive? Yes, but not strongly so if it is all broadly-based index funds. She will have most of her money in taxable accounts, however, and that does does have long-term capital gains tax implications, so she may need some light tax advice towards the end of the year for that. She can call upon her CPA if need be. The key to minimizing taxes is to look at turnover ratios of the various fund choices. Generally, the indexes have very low turnover rates. VOO for example is 2.1%. In contrast, the first fund she listed, CMNX, is a whopping 32.1%. So on top of the load fees and very high expense ratios, she likely was being saddled as well with capital gains. |
I think this is a little known fact of FA firm's managed funds. Capital gains tax within the fund. |
|
We just parted ways from our financial advisor. We had a good experience but felt we could take it from here...and save on the fees.
We were on Schwab and stayed with Schwab, only now we're considered self-directed. The process of becoming self-directed was fairly easy but you should really do some home work. Not sure if this was suggested already but look at the Bogleheads forum. They are incredibly helpful...even if you're only reading. Once you're comfortable with the process and you've set a path forward, it can be 'set it and let it'. Also, you'll need to lean on your tax accountant when its time. |
This is bad advise. Timing the market is a fools game. Keep what you have a find an advisor on NAPFA.org. Most CPA's do not understand investing and are not long term tax planners. They mostly look at what happened already. |
Agreed. Only reason not to immediately sell all the shit funds and reinvest into good cheap index funds is to map out the tax planning. Once you do that, there is no reason to leave anything in cash beyond what you want to leave for access in the next year or two. |
You are pushing NAPFA very hard. Many of those listed are fee only in that they take an assets under management fee. This is what has eaten into OP's returns. Her CPA can advise for end of year tax harvesting. Over time, she may wish to have longer tern tax planning advice from an advice only financial planner. But she is still young, and most of these issues concern retirement planning. I am not knocking the value of long-term tax planning at all. I wish I had had that much earlier to make me aware of things like RMDs, etc. (am way over-invested in my traditional 401k). But I don't see it as an immediate need for her, assuming she and her DH have basic things like life insurance well in hand. Her immediate need is to get out from under her current FA as soon as possible. |
|
Wow. I mean, holy wow!! Anyone – hands down, anyone – that pays a financial advisor for anything is complete and total moron. Everything you need to know about investing is available for free in books, libraries, and online resources. DH is only an investment novice, but over the past 10 years, we’ve put a very $1K per month in our brokerage. Started with nothing, but now have $340K, $220K in capital gains.
We’ve beaten the S&P 500 for 10 years straight and didn’t need some Charlatan of an advisor. In 10 more years when we hit out 40s, we’ll be rocking $2.5M! |
All NAPFA members are fee only. The fee structure is not what did them in. They dealt with a salesperson that put them in crappy investments - see Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Merrill, Edward Jones, and the like. You don't want your CPA involved in year end tax harvesting, they do not do long term investment management. And you are pushing your advice only friend. |
I went to look for a fee-only advisor through NAPFA a couple of years ago. What I needed was tax related advice. I called several and all made their money through assets under management fees. Sorry, I am simply not paying those as I can manage my investments. Tens of thousands of dollars a year for AUM to me is money down the drain. But fine if it is worth it to you. |
|
If I were OP I would start by posting on bogleheads and explaining the situation and ask for advice. That site is full of people who were being ripped off by expensive advisors but learned how to move to cheap self-directed plans.
The only slightly complicated part of this is extracting yourself from this advisor and portfolio. Managing it yourself is super easy. Just go for something like thd bogleheads-recommended 3-fund portfolio and rebalance once a year. I suspect getting out of this is easier than you think. Once you have everything self -managed in Wells Fargo you can probably switch much of the portfolio to Schwab or Fidelity without selling anything. |
Sounds like you're so good at investing, you should quit your day job and become an investor full-time! |
That 19 % temporary dip had no effect on anyone who didn't move their entire portfolio from cash into that fund in 2021, while also being retired and never adding more to it in future. |
Obviously you can not manage your investments. Tax advise is part of the management of your investments. Tax advise is tied to your estate plan, investments, what retirement plan you take, insurance , 529 plans, home repairs, college planning, and on it goes. You just didn't look hard enough to find an advisor that includes tax planning. Next time look at their websites. This is not difficult. |