Thank you and PP for explaining! I’ll check tomorrow. |
I hate to break this to you, but you aren't getting any of these services for free. |
Nope, most anti-financial advisor people here know exactly how stupid we are. And how stupid financial advisors/salespeople are. Which is why we buy and hold the market, and rebalance once a year. If you need to pay someone $25 k to stop you being emotional with money, that might be money better spent on therapists. |
| Thanks to my FA, I can now afford to pay an FA and not even blink about it. |
A bit harsh! I guess I am anti-advisor for myself, but some people are quite allergic to dealing with personal finance. I work around financial economists. One told me she sold all the stocks in her 401k in March 2020, and I don't think she needs a therapist. I also monitor Bogleheads, the ultimate in DIY investors, and notice many of the older ones get advisors in case they die to provide an off ramp to their nonfinancially-interested spouse. I have a sister who couldn't even tell me if she had a pension. When her ultra-frugal DH had a recent cancer scare, I learned that he had an FA and has told my sister to do whatever the FA advises should he die. |
The FA to protect/guide a spouse who has zero interest or willingness to engage in money management makes a lot of sense. Also if you are the one in charge of everything money related, you should make a document that guides your spouse to all the accounts info in case you are killed/incapacitated. |
| We paid Lori Atwood 1k/ year ago for advice on how to manage about 4 million. She also gave us advice on managing our regular spending. It was worth it. She went through everything very carefully. She was kind of conservative with our retirement accounts and I may change the allocations. But she was great overall. |
Well aware of that. Once you hit $10-15M+, with the ability for it to increase and assuming over $20M eventually, you need a special team. Yes, you pay one way or the other. But it would be stupid to not use the "free" services within our specialized financial management team. We are not paying extra for them, it's the perks of having a large amount invested with them and the likelihood of having more in the future. But we pay our percentage fee no matter what. Might as well save $10K+ per year in consultation fees. And in our case, the lead coordinator/wealth management manager besides our FA is actually someone we already knew who is highly qualified (they were our estate lawyer and then made the switch to Wealth Planning). So we have worked with them in other capacities for over a decade and love them and trust them. Except now, we don't pay $400+/hr to consult with them as a lawyer---it's all included at no additional cost to us. So we go to our lawyer with a well defined plan and only pay for 3-5 hours of work to make changes. Much better than 10-15 additional hours of consulting with the lawyer. |
But we don't get a break on the investment fee percentage if we don't use the services. So yes, in reality they are "free perks". If I'm paying X% of amount invested for my FA, that amount doesn't change if we don't use the extra services. So it would be foolish not to use those services. |
Good plan, when you are only worth $1-2M. Once you have $20M+, a great FA will have access to funds that "most people" do NOT have access to. You are open to a whole new world of PE ventures for example. Choose right (invest in PE ventures from firms that rarely fail) and those can have returns well above market averages. But you need $500K-1M+ to invest in these. hence why they are not available to most people. But when you have $20M+, it's another way to diversify with a some of risk but a huge chance for rewards. |
| The thing the planner provides if your accounts are under scrutiny is plausible deniability that someone else made a mistake. Only you can weight the value of that vs. the price you pay. |
You can think of it that way, but it is the wrong way. Critical thinking skills are not required for many jobs in the DC area. They are overcharging you, so they can throw in other things for "free". If they charge you $30,000 a year, they don't mind giving you $5,000 of free stuff. You can get what they are offering for a lot less with the same quality. You need to determine how much time you want to look for an extra $10,000 -$15,000 a year. Truth! |
If you are worth $20M+, $20K/year for a financial advisor is really just a blip on the financial radar. We pay more than that in property taxes for Each of our properties in a year. Fairly certain most people worth that much are not doing the investing themselves. Sure they could, but it's a service most are willing to pay for. Did my own until we were worth $3-4M. So totally capable of it. |
If you are paying $20,000 on a $20 million portfolio, you are down to a 0.1% AUM fee. I am more on the anti-FA side because of AUM fees digging into your returns, but at 0.1% PP is correct. That's just a blip on the radar. |
My example of a $30K fee is not based on a net worth, just using random numbers. |