Some saw the jizya tax as a good deal because it exempted you from military service, a real consideration during Islam's early days of conquest. (Note: The jizya tax has not existed for a very long time lest someone think Christians still pay this. Christians also serve in the armed forces and can rise to very high rank but not to the top where they would lead the armed forces.) |
I see where you see this as persecution of someone who is Christian in their heart and can't convert. However, another way of looking at it is that a person who is born Muslim is the one who is suffering persecution because he cannot convert to the religion he wishes. |
Why are you being so cutsey and speaking in a riddle? Just say that you think that a person who is born Muslim will always be Muslim and they may be said in their delusion that they are really a Christian and can't become one due to their peers around them (who actually are the ones who are right and are only protecting the poor soul). |
This is entirely false. The greatest persecution of Christians in the Middle East occurred during the Interwar Period and also coincided with the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. |
If you are speaking of Armenians in Turkey as part of the Middle East, I concede the point. If you are excluding the Armenians, whom, as I pointed out fled to safety living among Arabs in the Levant, I'd like to see some cites. |
Are you unfamiliar with the Assyrian genocide, Hammidian massacres, and Muslim conquests? It is literally unbelievable that someone claims Christian persecution “only really started” after the creation of Israel. Wow. Take a history class. |
The fact that you are not aware of this all (or what actually is reality is that you don't care to acknowledge the truth of it) is not of consequence. |
It's not persecution. Thanks pp for pointing out that paying jizya exempted you from the army. Arabs had much more tolerance than Christians did for other religions. |
Also, the idea that Armenians were persecuted because they didn't renounce Jesus in their hearts, and not because of their ethnicity (in which being one of the oldest Christian people is a HUGE aspect of self definition), is applying a very Protestant American view of religion and history that isn't really accurate. I an Armenian-American and have actually offended Armenians who fled to Russia during the genocide by asking too many questions about "belief" as though this was an individually chosen and changeable part of their identities. It's pretty closely analogous to saying agnostic or non-practicing Jews aren't really Jewish, for example. Ok, just wanted to explain that. I'm not actually trying to argue that Christians are not or have not been persecuted in the Middle East, but at least consider that religion isn't the same in that context. |
yes it is persecution. |
we’re excluding one of the worst historical genocides? come again? |
The Levant was a peaceful place of coexistence until European Jewish colonizers came. Is the argument. |
I think you are missing out on a lot of the role of religion in the Middle East. And by religion I don't mean your theological beliefs but the religion you are born into. Laws on civil status are totally governed by the religion you are born into and dictate marriage rights, including divorce and right or not to polygamy, the religion of children, guardianship of children whose parent are deceased, and inheritance. On top of that there are tribal views that get interspersed with religion to the point where many people view tribal customs as dictated by their religion when they in fact are not. The only Arab Christians I know who have converted to Islam are men who have done so to marry a Muslim woman. While Christian women can marry Muslim men (and keep their religion), Muslim women cannot marry non-Muslims. I do know a Muslim man who fled with his Christian girlfriend to Syria where they found a priest who baptized him and married the couple, but her family cut her off because she married in their view a Muslim. In other words, they did not view the conversion as valid, precisely because under the laws of their homeland he will always be a Muslim. After many years and emigration to the U.S. of the woman, her husband, and her family and the death of her father and all is forgiven. Almost. Her family still lived in the fear that the father could return to their homeland with the baptized and raised Catholic U.S. born children and register them as Muslim (the only choice for him under civil status laws because children of a born Muslim man are always Muslim), but that has gone away now that they are over 18. |
Ok...you continue to explain away persecution as "this is just how we do things". "Muslim" women should be able to marry whoever they want by the way. No one is always Muslim, unless their culture or gov't is a persecutor who forces them to claim a religion. |
We were talking about this century and the last in Arab countries, not in Turkey or Persia, which is where the Assyrian genocide and Hamidian massacres took place. A PP even referred to "recent" instances of severe oppression of Christians in specific Arab countries but has not provided cites. And the Wikipedia cite offered was all about the the Islamic State, not legitimate states. |