Politico: Susanna Gibson's Online Sex Life Was Exposed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

So these Republican POS knew years in advance that she would be running for office in 2023, just happened to be watching this private stream, and recorded it so they could deploy it after the election?

No. As pointed out in the articles, there are websites that pretty much automatically re-upload these live streams for archiving. Once she was running, someone sent a link to the press because they did their oppo research. It was all entirely predictable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

So these Republican POS knew years in advance that she would be running for office in 2023, just happened to be watching this private stream, and recorded it so they could deploy it after the election?

No. As pointed out in the articles, there are websites that pretty much automatically re-upload these live streams for archiving. Once she was running, someone sent a link to the press because they did their oppo research. It was all entirely predictable.

“Oppo research”? Is that what Republicans call it?

It wasn’t uploaded until after she entered the race.

Once again, Republicans turn to unethical methods to oppress women.

[Anonymous]

Narcissistic

[Anonymous]

Enjoys the attention. Like an adolescent

[Anonymous]

Why drag her family and young kids through more embarrassment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

So these Republican POS knew years in advance that she would be running for office in 2023, just happened to be watching this private stream, and recorded it so they could deploy it after the election?

No. As pointed out in the articles, there are websites that pretty much automatically re-upload these live streams for archiving. Once she was running, someone sent a link to the press because they did their oppo research. It was all entirely predictable.

“Oppo research”? Is that what Republicans call it?

It wasn’t uploaded until after she entered the race.

Once again, Republicans turn to unethical methods to oppress women.

The video was surely uploaded before she entered the race. Someone may have reuploaded it or sent a link to it after she entered the race. Unless you think that somehow Republicans archive every single porn stream to a private archive so they can upload them in case the person ever runs for office, it's a certainty that this was already online somewhere to be found, once she became the candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

So these Republican POS knew years in advance that she would be running for office in 2023, just happened to be watching this private stream, and recorded it so they could deploy it after the election?

No. As pointed out in the articles, there are websites that pretty much automatically re-upload these live streams for archiving. Once she was running, someone sent a link to the press because they did their oppo research. It was all entirely predictable.

“Oppo research”? Is that what Republicans call it?

It wasn’t uploaded until after she entered the race.

Once again, Republicans turn to unethical methods to oppress women.

The video was surely uploaded before she entered the race. Someone may have reuploaded it or sent a link to it after she entered the race. Unless you think that somehow Republicans archive every single porn stream to a private archive so they can upload them in case the person ever runs for office, it's a certainty that this was already online somewhere to be found, once she became the candidate.

I’m guessing someone recorded them at the time and recognized her at some point - either initially or later when she was running. Then they uploaded it *after* she entered the race and let the Rs know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

Pray tell, where was it live streaming?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

So these Republican POS knew years in advance that she would be running for office in 2023, just happened to be watching this private stream, and recorded it so they could deploy it after the election?

No. As pointed out in the articles, there are websites that pretty much automatically re-upload these live streams for archiving. Once she was running, someone sent a link to the press because they did their oppo research. It was all entirely predictable.

“Oppo research”? Is that what Republicans call it?

It wasn’t uploaded until after she entered the race.

Once again, Republicans turn to unethical methods to oppress women.

The video was surely uploaded before she entered the race. Someone may have reuploaded it or sent a link to it after she entered the race. Unless you think that somehow Republicans archive every single porn stream to a private archive so they can upload them in case the person ever runs for office, it's a certainty that this was already online somewhere to be found, once she became the candidate.

There’s facial recognition software that can comb the web looking for probable matches. This isn’t new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.