Politico: Susanna Gibson's Online Sex Life Was Exposed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in videos you livestream to the internet. This isn’t hard and should not be controversial.

Exactly. I have to laugh at her defenders, claiming she's some kind of "victim" here. Their stupidity is staggering and pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She intended it to be streamed in a private, adult setting.

Recording it was unethical.

Distributing the recording was unethical.

Publicizing it widely was unethical.

Sending screenshots & quotes of it to unsuspecting families in VA was unethical.

You may or may not agree with what she did, but there was a lot of other crap that happened that she is calling out.

The only thing she should be calling out is her own incredibly irresponsible and STUPID behavior in making online porn videos in the first place. That you won't acknowledge this tells us everything we need to know.

I already called it stupid and poor judgment.

And there is some POS who recorded it and uploaded it to a public website.

Sweetie, she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.

Chaturbate is one of the most popular webcam sites on the internet, and since its launch in 2011 has had a 3,200% increase in interest from users around the world. Viewers can watch for free or pay tips if they'd like to see certain sex acts performed.

“We decided to just have fun on camera, doing exactly what we wanted to do,” she explains. “This means we gave away a lot for free our first night, making only $8 (£6) the whole night.” Beth drew in an audience of 380 people, but she thinks the top ‘cammers’ earn thousands of pounds a night.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/webcam-camming-couple-sex-strangers-chaturbate-a7424416.html

It’s not available on chaturbate. And it wasn’t public when she was live streaming. Someone else recorded it and made it public.

How old are you? Not too familiar with interwebs, eh?

DP. Forgive us if we're "not too familiar" with chaturbate, as you clearly are. Are you actually so dumb to presume no one would record a livestream? Whether for their own purposes or to make it public - doesn't really matter. Pretty sure the audience for a chaturbate sesh isn't exactly the most upstanding crowd. Stop defending this idiot pretending to be a victim. You look as stupid as she does.

I’m familiar with live streaming.

This PP was incorrect: “she was the one who put it on a public website. Like literally anyone in the world could have watched.”

She wasn’t the person who put it on a public website.

She started multiple live stream on chaturbate which is a public site. Like you can go to it now click on a window and start watching some random person masturbate. She did offer to go to a private room for cash, but the offer was to the public.

I open to a rebuttal of this argument with actual facts but stomping your feet and claiming to be a “familiar with live steaming” isn’t that persuasive.

Show us her videos on Chaturbate. Oh wait. They aren’t there because it was live stream years ago.

The only way it was available for public viewing in 2023 was because someone else recorded it and uploaded it onto another website after she entered the race. And because a Republican POS reported it to WaPo.

The only way it was available for public viewing is that she put it on a public live stream in the first place.

+1.

PP will next claim trademark infringement or copyright violation.

The chick put videos of herself get boned on the internet. Ain't no way in hell anyone is convincing anyone she is a victim.

No, she did not “put videos of herself” on the internet. It was live streaming.

She herself freely agreed to the platform’s terms of use so she could broadcast her sexual activity for the possibility of making some money. The terms of use specifically warn that the content streamed may be recorded. She consented to the terms of use.

She knew it could be recorded.

And there are bots which record ALL of this stuff, especially bots located outside the USA.

Ever notice FaceBook’s facial recognition software? It is not new. It is simple, cheap, and available.

And yes, there HAVE been Republicans shamed over somewhat similar situations (though nothing this egregious), but they did not go blaming everyone else for their poor judgement when the truth came out.

She’s done, politically.

Which Republicans were shamed for similar situations?

No one will care next time she runs. She only lost by <1000 votes.

Bobert has a following on DCUM. Perhaps you have heard of her?

Oh right. Forgot that she fondled some dude in public. Are people really still talking about that?

Only Democrats, who are obsessed. Imagine if she had livestreamed herself doing porn!

[Anonymous]

While we are on the subject, how good are her pics?

[Anonymous]

I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know Gibson lost and the other thread was closed. But she just gave an interview to Politico and is framing this as a revenge porn situation. I voted for her, but didn't she willingly film herself on a porn site? I'm surprised that fact got scrubbed from this article:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/09/susanna-gibson-virginia-digital-privacy-00130883

You voted for her??? This forum is a DC area forum and I’m surprised so many Richmond area people are on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know Gibson lost and the other thread was closed. But she just gave an interview to Politico and is framing this as a revenge porn situation. I voted for her, but didn't she willingly film herself on a porn site? I'm surprised that fact got scrubbed from this article:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/09/susanna-gibson-virginia-digital-privacy-00130883

You voted for her??? This forum is a DC area forum and I’m surprised so many Richmond area people are on this.

OP here. Our primary home is now in the Richmond area but we still have our condo in NE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

[Anonymous]

I think all Democratic candidates should be forced to produce online pornography so that no future candidate is disadvantaged by their sexual proclivities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think all Democratic candidates should be forced to produce online pornography so that no future candidate is disadvantaged by their sexual proclivities.

best answer yet

eliminate inequality!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.

NP here. You understand she announced her candidacy in July 2022, and did a live stream in 9/22? Ignorance is not a defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.

We expect that line of thought from teenagers. But an adult woman should understand that filming yourself on camera for desperate, paying men means the video has been recorded and distributed to a lot of people. These guys upload every single OnlyFans etc picture/video to free sites that show up on Google searches and also have forums where they ask for help finding old videos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.

NP here. You understand she announced her candidacy in July 2022, and did a live stream in 9/22? Ignorance is not a defense.

No, she didn’t. Someone uploaded an old one then. The live streaming all happened years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

Oh! Got it. She just didn’t think she would be caught.

Seriously. Even if she didn’t think this was a big deal, the fact that she didn’t think something like this can’t get out publicly means she’s not smart enough to be deciding public policy. By now doesn’t everybody know the social media toothpaste metaphor?
When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.