Politico: Susanna Gibson's Online Sex Life Was Exposed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

DP. Then she’s a complete and utter idiot. Even middle schoolers know that they should have no expectation of privacy regarding anything they put online. We as parents drill this into our children’s minds. How did Susanna Gibson, an ADULT, somehow miss the memo? I can’t imagine voting for someone so incredibly stupid. She is no victim and claiming otherwise makes her look even more foolish, if that’s even possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think all Democratic candidates should be forced to produce online pornography so that no future candidate is disadvantaged by their sexual proclivities.

best answer yet

eliminate inequality!!

+1
“Equity!!!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I admit when this story broke I read some of the video transcripts and watched some of the excerpts on twitter (nothing was p@rn level or showed nudity). When she was talking and typing on her chats, she disclosed where she lived when some in the chat said they lived in Roanoke and she was saying something like "oh that's not far from us, maybe we know each other" and then laughed.

She didn't seem high or under the influence or duress. It didn't look like she had any "expectation of privacy" at all. Cry me a river.

I am mad she ran, because she knew these videos were out there, and apparently there was another candidate in the democratic primary who was very similar (minus the p@rn I assume) so if she really wanted democrats to win she would have disclosed this and perhaps step aside for the other person to run under the ticket. She wasn't our savior. She doesn't need to be perfect but this entire situation is all her fault. And in the end, it likely costs her the election and the democrats that seat.

She did not know the videos were out there.

When she positioned the camera on her crotch, connected the camera to the internet, and hit “send” to send the video to people she did not know at all, she KNEW videos of her were out there.

If she truly didn’t know, she is perhaps the dumbest person on the planet.

I don’t think anyone so dumb as that should be elected to higher office.

It was live streaming years ago. She didn’t know that someone actually recorded it and then later uploaded to another site.

Then she’s a complete fool. Of course porn watchers record what they see. Are you really this dumb?
DP

[Anonymous]

Isn’t her co-star, her husband, a lawyer? So isn’t the standard what a reasonable lawyer would assume is their right to privacy in live-streaming her pee on him?

They are bother so so dumb. No tears for them.