2009 ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

MA coaches are terrible.

Field space availability, weather issues are def not helping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

There is a lack of high quality coaches around here. Beyond that, we don't even have a real idea on the scope of what a real mega club is. Solar SC in TX fields over 200 'competitive travel' teams, over 100 boys and 100 girls teams respectively, of course with that kind of sample size, you're going to find some gems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

There is a lack of high quality coaches around here. Beyond that, we don't even have a real idea on the scope of what a real mega club is. Solar SC in TX fields over 200 'competitive travel' teams, over 100 boys and 100 girls teams respectively, of course with that kind of sample size, you're going to find some gems.

Our little scrappy club has 50 teams. Surely big ones like Bethesda/Arlington have 200, no?

[Anonymous]

By my count, Arlington has 152 combined, BSC has 77 total combined.

Just for kicks, Loudoun has 108 combined teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

There is a lack of high quality coaches around here. Beyond that, we don't even have a real idea on the scope of what a real mega club is. Solar SC in TX fields over 200 'competitive travel' teams, over 100 boys and 100 girls teams respectively, of course with that kind of sample size, you're going to find some gems.

None of these nova coaches could hang in Florida, Texas, or SoCal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

There is a lack of high quality coaches around here. Beyond that, we don't even have a real idea on the scope of what a real mega club is. Solar SC in TX fields over 200 'competitive travel' teams, over 100 boys and 100 girls teams respectively, of course with that kind of sample size, you're going to find some gems.

None of these nova coaches could hang in Florida, Texas, or SoCal.

Florida? Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone elaborate on why there’s a gap between the level of teams in MA vs those teams in Texas and California? Style of play, coaching experience and quality or ?

There is a lack of high quality coaches around here. Beyond that, we don't even have a real idea on the scope of what a real mega club is. Solar SC in TX fields over 200 'competitive travel' teams, over 100 boys and 100 girls teams respectively, of course with that kind of sample size, you're going to find some gems.

None of these nova coaches could hang in Florida, Texas, or SoCal.

Florida? Please.

[Anonymous]

I think CC formerly of FCV would be fine in Texas. CW would also be fine. Those are the only two on the girls side that are probably on that level. Why CC chose VRSC absolutely blows my mind though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think CC formerly of FCV would be fine in Texas. CW would also be fine. Those are the only two on the girls side that are probably on that level. Why CC chose VRSC absolutely blows my mind though.

So the coaches that coach nova teams that beat Texas teams aren’t good enough to coach in Texas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA 2009 is the best in the DMV.

VDA Fanboy claims best in DMV...VDA 09s are 2-4-1 in it's last 7 games.

Ouch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA 2009 is the best in the DMV.

VDA Fanboy claims best in DMV...VDA 09s are 2-4-1 in it's last 7 games.

Ouch

-10 GD also. Don't worry though, BP is coming to make things better 😅

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA 2009 is the best in the DMV.

VDA Fanboy claims best in DMV...VDA 09s are 2-4-1 in it's last 7 games.

Ouch

All losses by 3 or more goals.

Losses:
VDA 2 - 5 RU
VDA 0 - 3 NVA
VDA 0 - 3 FC Prime
VDA 0 - 4 PDA Blue

GF: 2 GA: 15

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA 2009 is the best in the DMV.

VDA Fanboy claims best in DMV...VDA 09s are 2-4-1 in it's last 7 games.

Ouch

All losses by 3 or more goals.

Losses:
VDA 2 - 5 RU
VDA 0 - 3 NVA
VDA 0 - 3 FC Prime
VDA 0 - 4 PDA Blue

GF: 2 GA: 15

How many yellow cards?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA 2009 is the best in the DMV.

VDA Fanboy claims best in DMV...VDA 09s are 2-4-1 in it's last 7 games.

Ouch

All losses by 3 or more goals.

Losses:
VDA 2 - 5 RU
VDA 0 - 3 NVA
VDA 0 - 3 FC Prime
VDA 0 - 4 PDA Blue

GF: 2 GA: 15

How many yellow cards?

For the players or AS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think CC formerly of FCV would be fine in Texas. CW would also be fine. Those are the only two on the girls side that are probably on that level. Why CC chose VRSC absolutely blows my mind though.

You will find out soon. Revolution has the best private facility in Washington DC reason. This will make a difference in their outcome.