Boundary Study Townhalls - first one starts now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Well then I would take Murch off your problem at risk percentage. They were at 9% a couple years ago. I bet they are 15% now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

I cannot understand why all the hate for parents who prefer that their kids not be rerouted to a lower performing school in a less convenient location. Maybe they should be due to overcrowding in ward 3 and in order to improve upper ward 4 schools, and that’s fine. But not wanting that is a perfectly reasonable position for any parent. Stop acting so bitter about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

NP. This is why rich kids should integrate low performing schools. It will never happen because most UMC and wealthy are all about opportunity hoarding and only want to appear concerned by placing a social justice sign in their yard. They actually don’t care and won’t work to make DCPS better.

Rich kids don’t go to DCPS schools.

There are plenty of wealthy people with kids in DCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

I cannot understand why all the hate for parents who prefer that their kids not be rerouted to a lower performing school in a less convenient location. Maybe they should be due to overcrowding in ward 3 and in order to improve upper ward 4 schools, and that’s fine. But not wanting that is a perfectly reasonable position for any parent. Stop acting so bitter about it.

The burden of attending high performing schools should be placed on those with lesser means. Makes no sense. Again, we know that UMC are quite happy to hoard opportunities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

Lafayette parents are not happy being near minorities. This is why there was a group of Lafayette parents working to move Shepherd out of Deal a couple of years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

I cannot understand why all the hate for parents who prefer that their kids not be rerouted to a lower performing school in a less convenient location. Maybe they should be due to overcrowding in ward 3 and in order to improve upper ward 4 schools, and that’s fine. But not wanting that is a perfectly reasonable position for any parent. Stop acting so bitter about it.

The burden of attending high performing schools should be placed on those with lesser means. Makes no sense. Again, we know that UMC are quite happy to hoard opportunities.

Of course but that’s obvious. Who doesn’t want what’s best for the kids and family? No one is going to say “self let me enroll in this extremely low performing school and sacrifice my children on the social justice hill so that a high risk child may take my spot”. No rational parent would do this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this Ward talk. I didn’t know DCPS was supposed to align its feeder patterns by wards. Seems like it should be by proximity, and that may or may not fall along arbitrary ward lines. But if staying in ward is the desired policy, shouldn’t Bancroft then be compelled to stay in their ward. They are ward 1, right? Also by proximity it would make sense not to cross the park to get to school.

And you know Ward 3 starts literally across the street from Lafayette, right?

And Murch starts literally across the street from Crestwood. The catchment for Lafayette is big enough that they could send some of those kids to Ward 4 schools.

I love how some posters think that Lafayette parents would just throw up their hands and say "oh well, we're now zoned for (insert poorly performing school that's further away), guess we have no choice but to send our kids there". Not happening, and the people that make these decisions know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

I know plenty of W7 and W8 kids commuting to attend Shepherd, Deal, JR, and DCI. Why would they not also commute to Lafayette or Janney given the opportunity. There is a way to have equitable access for these schools. Yes, they should not be enrolling over capacity but 100% of the lottery spots should be at risk. Not even 10-15% but 100% of them.

And if you are going to shut out MC kids in Wards 7,8,4, etc. from the lottery, you need to make MC students in some of the wealthier schools (Lafayette, Shepherd, Murch, and now Bancroft, etc.) share the resources that flow with them by integrating schools EOTP. You can draw lines dictated by property values and say the kids on military road a certain section of 16th Street get the golden ticket, and the other section of 16th street or the kids on Piney Branch can never get access to "Wilson for All" because their houses are not worth as much.

Has nothing to do with property values. All schools should have a set aside for at risk student. The ones that are closer to 100% capacity AND have a very low threshold of At-risk should be 100% at risk for any OOB spots until they reach X threshold. It's not that hard.

Lafayette is 2% at risk. They should not be able to accept a student from the lottery that is not designated at-risk until they are 10% or 15% at-risk. This should be for every DCPS neighborhood school at all levels.

Other than that, go to your IB school or one of the many city wide charters if you want school choice. Nobody says there is access to Lafayette for all.

Has everything to do with property values - some of the kids zoned for Lafayette (and Shepherd) could very easily commute to Brightwood or Whittier or Takoma - but because they are wealthy, entitled, and mostly white, they won't commute. Witness the stink about ECE for Lafayette parents. Mayor could have given Military Road school to Brightwood to relieve overcrowding - nope - she offered it to Chevy Chase and they said we would rather die than cross the park. #Facts.

I cannot understand why all the hate for parents who prefer that their kids not be rerouted to a lower performing school in a less convenient location. Maybe they should be due to overcrowding in ward 3 and in order to improve upper ward 4 schools, and that’s fine. But not wanting that is a perfectly reasonable position for any parent. Stop acting so bitter about it.

DC, let them eat cake, and convert more CCCC tennis courts to pickleball while you are at it. Little Cassius and Cassiopeia must...have...pickleball. We will not cross the park and we demand more pickleball. TIA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

NP. This is why rich kids should integrate low performing schools. It will never happen because most UMC and wealthy are all about opportunity hoarding and only want to appear concerned by placing a social justice sign in their yard. They actually don’t care and won’t work to make DCPS better.

I think that's true. I am an UMC parent who lives in-bounds for a top performing school and I'm not interested in my kids not having the opportunity to attend the top performing school located in the neighborhood that my husband and I worked our asses off to be able to afford, in the name of social justice. I mean, who is? I'm all for making the world a better place blah blah blah, but not at the expense of my child's education or opportunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this Ward talk. I didn’t know DCPS was supposed to align its feeder patterns by wards. Seems like it should be by proximity, and that may or may not fall along arbitrary ward lines. But if staying in ward is the desired policy, shouldn’t Bancroft then be compelled to stay in their ward. They are ward 1, right? Also by proximity it would make sense not to cross the park to get to school.

And you know Ward 3 starts literally across the street from Lafayette, right?

And Murch starts literally across the street from Crestwood. The catchment for Lafayette is big enough that they could send some of those kids to Ward 4 schools.

I love how some posters think that Lafayette parents would just throw up their hands and say "oh well, we're now zoned for (insert poorly performing school that's further away), guess we have no choice but to send our kids there". Not happening, and the people that make these decisions know that.

Many of them already pay for private school because Lafayette is actually a pretty crappy school (the parents are creating the scores, not the teachers), and they can lottery for city-wide charters or another DCPS if they want. Or move across the street to Maryland - just like all of the other parents in DC don't have out of ward feeder privileges. They aren't made special by the magic acorns on their side of Rock Creek Park.

[Anonymous]

It’s been a long time since I listened but isn’t the podcast Nice White Parents about parents who did stay in an underperforming school, but they like jacked it up to suit them? Is this what we’re proposing? Or the rich families are supposed to go to the underperforming schools and just be quiet? Maybe putting the onus on kids and families isn’t quite right because they’ll almost always act in their self interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Push Shepherd to Coolidge and the south part of the Coolidge catchment further south to the underenrolled schools, just like Hardy is being pushed south to MacA. There are plenty of open seats at existing schools.

Or instead of pushing anyone EOTP which the city has clearly stated they don't want, push another school in W3 to Hardy and MacArthur. Easier pull to swallow sending kids to equal performing schools don't you think? Unless you really are determined to make JR and Deal all white.

Push some EOTP students south and you’ll get a higher performing school. Unless you don’t want to go where there are so many OOB kids? Why is that?

I don't live in Shepherd Park but your logic makes zero sense and you know it. Shepherd's 40 kids will make zero difference at Coolidge (already at 100% capacity). So you'd need to send 250 kids from Coolidge to Brookland middle and Dunbar. Then you can send the 40 kids from Shepherd and the 200 kids from Lafayette. Yes. I agree, that could be tenable. But now you got an under-enrolled Deal and JR, same as Hardy and MacArthur. It would make more sense to take some kids from Janney and send them to Hardy and MacArthur.

Also Deal/JR to Hardy/MA, you're more likely to have buy-in. With moving kids from Wells/Coolidge to Brookland/Dunbar and then Deal/JR to Wells/Coolidge, you're pissing off and possibly losing 450 families vs 200 from Janney (or insert W3 neighborhood). Also W3 going to Hardy/MA is as close to even trade as you can get. The other scenario, everyone goes down in quality. Not to mention, you now have an all white Deal/JR.

I’m confused why you think there are only white kids enrolled at Deal feeders WOTP

Janney: 4% Black
Murch: 13% Black
Lafayette: 8% Black
Hearst: 17% Black
Deal: 26% Black
Hardy: 29% Black
DCPS: 57% Black, 22% Hispanic, 17% White

Ok but that still doesn’t add up to an all white Deal and JR.

I’m also very confused why we must insist that schools be the exact same percentages of the city for every school. Are we insisting that schools in Ward 8 take Hispanic kids? Because I don’t think we are.

Is anyone insisting on that? I think they are just pointing out that JR feeders are self segregated, in some cases extremely so.

There is no way to fix that. Houses are 1 million plus. The apartments are accepting vouchers so more at risk kids are getting in to Murch and Hearst. Janney has no apartments and Lafayette has very few. Maybe they should move some of the apartment buildings to those schools.

The only other way to fix it is to blow up neighborhood schools and that is not going to happen.

There absolutely is a way to try to fix it. Janney and Lafayette should not accept one single kid via lottery that is not at-risk. Period. You want extra funding to round out your new 2nd grade bubble class, all 10 of the kids you need to get there have to be at-risk. It's a simple fix. I know someone that got off the list OOB this year at one of the schools that is a very wealthy Crestwood family. That should no longer occur.

As an OOB family at one of those schools, I think it will be difficult to fill at-risk elementary slots. It’s a colossal pain in the ass to schlep your kid across the park every day. Lafayette especially is in the middle of nowhere and poorly served with public transit. Not dissing your idea, but sadly it takes privilege on top of lottery luck to attend these schools OOB.

NP. This is why rich kids should integrate low performing schools. It will never happen because most UMC and wealthy are all about opportunity hoarding and only want to appear concerned by placing a social justice sign in their yard. They actually don’t care and won’t work to make DCPS better.

I think that's true. I am an UMC parent who lives in-bounds for a top performing school and I'm not interested in my kids not having the opportunity to attend the top performing school located in the neighborhood that my husband and I worked our asses off to be able to afford, in the name of social justice. I mean, who is? I'm all for making the world a better place blah blah blah, but not at the expense of my child's education or opportunity.

Uh-huh, but ingrained in your deep privilege, Veruca, is the belief that you and your husband somehow work harder than people who live in other parts of town. And there is just no evidence in the record that that is the case, if anything, a woman cleaning houses in Mt. Pleasant works way harder. You might work hard at a desk job - or mommy and day put a nonpayment on your Colonial Village estate, or what have you. But the idea that simply you are wealthy or live in a certain part of town because you work harder is 1) gross and 2) not verifiable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a long time since I listened but isn’t the podcast Nice White Parents about parents who did stay in an underperforming school, but they like jacked it up to suit them? Is this what we’re proposing? Or the rich families are supposed to go to the underperforming schools and just be quiet? Maybe putting the onus on kids and families isn’t quite right because they’ll almost always act in their self interest.

Not really. NWP was about an immersion program. But the podcast had a lot of critics and sounds like the reporter was kind of loosie-goosie with the facts about a very real school. And of course, not all wealthy parents in DC are white. I think what multiple people are saying is that existing feeder patterns are creating security dilemmas for other schools -and thereby bringing the other schools down. Out-of-ward preferences are one example, but there are others. Having charter schools start in the 5th grade creates security dilemmas, for example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a long time since I listened but isn’t the podcast Nice White Parents about parents who did stay in an underperforming school, but they like jacked it up to suit them? Is this what we’re proposing? Or the rich families are supposed to go to the underperforming schools and just be quiet? Maybe putting the onus on kids and families isn’t quite right because they’ll almost always act in their self interest.

I mean, I think "nice white parents" who integrate schools need to go in with humility and not assume that they can "make the school better" somehow with their ideas. They can have some faith that even if their kids don't go to the very best, most resourced school, they will still do well.