VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

It is honest work. Many people do it.

Most college girls can get a little extra $$ as “cam girls.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

Lots of people were ok with electing a rapist and serial pu$$y grabber for the highest elected office in the country.

So, let’s continue the tradition??? WTF, 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

Which wrong are you talking about? It's wrong when people don't or can't consent. But everyone involved here was an adult and consenting. I would have zero problems voting for someone who created x-rated content, as long as everyone involved in the content was an adult and consenting.

NP. If what she did is okay then why is she trying to pull everything off the web?
Kind of an aside but as the internet never forgets, how did she not think of her children’s future? The torment they will experience will be horrible.

[Anonymous]

Did no one else read the part where she talked about their lifestyle being her idea, her husband not liking it, but she made him do it anyway?

Violating the basic core rule of ethical non-monogamy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

It is honest work. Many people do it.

Most college girls can get a little extra $$ as “cam girls.”

Da fuq? No they don’t. Do you always make up such asinine theories?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

Lots of people were ok with electing a rapist and serial pu$$y grabber for the highest elected office in the country.

So, let’s continue the tradition??? WTF, 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

Which wrong are you talking about? It's wrong when people don't or can't consent. But everyone involved here was an adult and consenting. I would have zero problems voting for someone who created x-rated content, as long as everyone involved in the content was an adult and consenting.

NP. If what she did is okay then why is she trying to pull everything off the web?
Kind of an aside but as the internet never forgets, how did she not think of her children’s future? The torment they will experience will be horrible.

Most people really don't understand the rather permanent nature of the Internet at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

It is honest work. Many people do it.

Most college girls can get a little extra $$ as “cam girls.”

Monetizing your body probably isn't a healthy life experience at that age. But whatever, people are free to screw up their lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

It is honest work. Many people do it.

Most college girls can get a little extra $$ as “cam girls.”

I always learned that "If you don't want the information to appear on the front page of the Washington Post, don't do it."
So, now that has come to fruition. And, she is blaming other people for her indiscretions.

I don't believe "sex work is honest work." I believe it is part of what is causing the moral decay in our country. What you and your partner do behind closed doors is your business. Not to be monetized or publicized. And, those college girls may eventually regret their behavior.
And, clearly, her reaction to this whole story indicates she is at least slightly shamed by it. Otherwise, she would be "owning it." She isn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I think this is worse than no gun restrictions, an abortion ban, a roll back of LGTBQ rights, and no regard for the environment? No!

I agree with all that but this woman has clearly demonstrated a serious lack of good judgment so I wouldn't trust her to represent me on a state level or probably any level.

I think Trump puts us way past holding anyone to a moral standard. He lost two lawsuits accusing him of sexual assault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

It is honest work. Many people do it.

Most college girls can get a little extra $$ as “cam girls.”

I always learned that "If you don't want the information to appear on the front page of the Washington Post, don't do it."
So, now that has come to fruition. And, she is blaming other people for her indiscretions.

I don't believe "sex work is honest work." I believe it is part of what is causing the moral decay in our country. What you and your partner do behind closed doors is your business. Not to be monetized or publicized. And, those college girls may eventually regret their behavior.
And, clearly, her reaction to this whole story indicates she is at least slightly shamed by it. Otherwise, she would be "owning it." She isn't.

NP. She participated in an industry that relies on the exploitation of women and human trafficking, that dehumanizes people. That’s enough for me to decide she shouldn’t be a public servant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, trust Louise Lucas to come to this woman's defense! Liberals love aberrant individuals - the more outrageous, the better.

A top-ranking Virginia Democrat immediately came to Gibson’s defense after the videos were reported by the Post. “Now we are going to make this the biggest fundraising day of her campaign,” Sen. L. Louis Lucas said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Lol. I'm sure. And what exactly do they get for those big donations? I think I saw something about peeing?

Here we have someone who actually has a peepee tape and Dems not only shrug it off... they send more money to her! How ironic.

It’s enpowering for a woman to get people to pay for videos of her peeing, or something.

She obviously is into this type of behavior. But I have to wonder what her husband is going to do.

[Anonymous]

lets talk about Stormy Daniel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

Didn't your lord and savior Trump dated a porn star?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

Didn't your lord and savior Trump dated a porn star?

If you think only Republicans have an issue with this then you’re sadly mistaken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:lets talk about Stormy Daniel?

Republicans shun the seller not the purchaser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

We elected Trump.