False. The PP was referring to the Berklee School of Music |
| I can accept every list being proposed on this thread with the exception of those that include Cornell |
|
None in America because it is not a meritocracy. Perhaps MIT. |
What does merit have to do with prestige? Anyway, likely more correct to say not exclusively a meritocracy on exclusively the criteria you deem having merit. The vast majority of kids who attend prestigious schools are extremely high achieving. |
+1 I agree with this, except I’m not sure what the impact of Columbia’s scandal will be on them going forward. |
Cornell CS, Engineering, Business(Dyson) are very prestigious. Hotel Management NO |
| DCUM netizens don't value CA schools at all. Interesting. |
One of the PPs included Stanford and Caltech though? |
+1 well thought out. Each has its purpose. |
| Berkeley only accept 9% oos? |
You are trying to apply the word prestigious in place of lucrative. They are two different things. |
|
Many branded school are not terribly prestiguous for the undergrad, particular for STEM.
Grad on other hand has more prestige. |
The acceptance rate for out-of-state applicants to the University of California, Berkeley is 8.6%. |
When the society, industry, real word treat it like dirt, it's not prestigious. It's called a scam or fantasy at the best. |
Sure, Harvard grads are treated like dirt. How about compare major to major? |