Yes, yes, yes and yes…which is why they do not need a raise. They do not need to be doing 1/2 the things they are focused on doing, which is mostly just appearances. NO ONE CARES! If we had a strong SB that focused on academics, they wouldn’t need to spend so much time responding to angry constituents. Plus, what are their FT assistants then doing and then also the office staff that support the entire SB? More teachers—less SB support staff. |
| The meeting started an hour ago and all they have done is finish two of four proclamations. So much talking and no actual work again. |
If you were going to raise your own salary, you’d do it after people have already tuned out for the evening, too. They never stay even remotely close to on schedule. The sound of their own voices is just too enthralling. |
They are not raising their own salaries! Only four of the current twelve will be affected by this, assuming they are re-elected. |
| Doesn't matter. They are supporting their party. |
They are proposing to raise the salaries of those in their current positions. And note that the two members who have proposed a smaller raise are not among the four seeking re-election. At their current pace, they won’t take this up until after midnight, given the discussion about the equity policy that hasn’t even started yet. |
|
At this pace they may push it to the next agenda. I’m surprised Meren is still awake and hasn’t stormed out by now.
Also, Rachna is an awful chair. She has no idea of any of the parliamentary procedures and is always constantly confused. |
|
Motion: $60,404 (+$2000 for chair)
Yays: Everyone else Nays: n/a Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky, Omeish Proposed Amendment: $48,000 (+$2,000 for chair) consistent with large paid boards (introduced by Derenak-Kaufax & seconded by Corbett-Sanders) Yays: Everyone else Nays: Omeish Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky Motion for more information during 3rd year with action in 4th year to explore comparison of salaries of similar sized Boards and THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. (LOL at them thinking leading a school district of 180K students is comparable to running an entire County full of services for 1.15Million residents) |
WTF. Can we vote to repeal their decision? I'm not paying for this. |
$48,000 is better than the $60,404 (the $48,000 is what was adopted, I believe) |
| Why are two people abstaining of four are running? |
Because they don't want their political opponents to use it against them. Pekarsky is running for State Senate. Meren has an opponent for School Board. They are two of the most political on the Board along with Cohen and Frisch. |
| Don’t the other two running have the same needs? Is there an actual conflict of interest? |
Maybe Pekarsky and Meren have higher household income and don't need a raise. |
Bingo. Which is why they should’ve just raised their hands for the “optics” of saying, “yes we work long and hard hours and I am privileged to be able to do this work thanks to my husband’s salary.” For the sake of EQUITY, they should’ve raised their hands! 😝 Single moms/dads, most blue collar/working-class folks cannot afford to settle to be paid the least. |