School Board Proposes 77% Pay Increase for Themselves

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It won’t go into effect until the next school board is sworn in.

Personally, I’m in favor of it. It’s a thankless job that requires countless hours. Who would you expect to run? How could someone hold down a full-time job AND do this? If the salary isn’t raised, you’re only going to have candidates that are wealthy.


It should be a part-time position and they should be meet at night to provide community oversight. They meet constantly to justify their importance but they accomplish very little and, to the extent they do anything, it’s mostly meddling with staff decisions to advance their own personal agendas. That’s not going to change, and they’ll feel even more empowered to be useless busybodies if they make almost 2x as much.


That's just not how a school board operates in a system as big as ours. They have meetings at night but then also day-long work sessions. They have to go to schools, meet with principals, tour buildings and step in on classes. They have to go to PTA meetings and other community events. They have to respond to go many parents and constituents and communicate with all the high level staff and superintendent. That's a full time job.

Running for school board should be accessible to working parents and with a 30k salary, it isn't really to most people unless you own your own company or are rich.


FCPS has a very large staff that does most of these things, and does so more effectively than the School Board. They have a “full-time job” in large part to dissuade others from running against them. Rather than pay them more to meddle even more, they should scale back their activities and hire a strong Superintendent - instead, the main criteria for top leadership now is the extent to which they’ll allow themselves to get bosses around. If anything, there is an inverse correlation between the number of hours Board members meet and the effective operation of FCPS.


Well said.

The SB meetings are very long--but look at how long it takes to get to the real work. Last week the meat of the meeting did not begin for two hours. The business itself lasted only one hour.

The proclamations and resolutions have gone way over the top with the statements and then the comments.

And, most of the contentiousness seems to be because of their refusal to listen to the wishes of the parents. Instead of putting academics as the focus of the Board, it is activism.



Yes, yes, yes and yes…which is why they do not need a raise. They do not need to be doing 1/2 the things they are focused on doing, which is mostly just appearances. NO ONE CARES!

If we had a strong SB that focused on academics, they wouldn’t need to spend so much time responding to angry constituents.

Plus, what are their FT assistants then doing and then also the office staff that support the entire SB?

More teachers—less SB support staff.
Anonymous
The meeting started an hour ago and all they have done is finish two of four proclamations. So much talking and no actual work again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The meeting started an hour ago and all they have done is finish two of four proclamations. So much talking and no actual work again.


If you were going to raise your own salary, you’d do it after people have already tuned out for the evening, too.

They never stay even remotely close to on schedule. The sound of their own voices is just too enthralling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The meeting started an hour ago and all they have done is finish two of four proclamations. So much talking and no actual work again.


If you were going to raise your own salary, you’d do it after people have already tuned out for the evening, too.

They never stay even remotely close to on schedule. The sound of their own voices is just too enthralling.


They are not raising their own salaries! Only four of the current twelve will be affected by this, assuming they are re-elected.
Anonymous
Doesn't matter. They are supporting their party.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The meeting started an hour ago and all they have done is finish two of four proclamations. So much talking and no actual work again.


If you were going to raise your own salary, you’d do it after people have already tuned out for the evening, too.

They never stay even remotely close to on schedule. The sound of their own voices is just too enthralling.


They are not raising their own salaries! Only four of the current twelve will be affected by this, assuming they are re-elected.


They are proposing to raise the salaries of those in their current positions.

And note that the two members who have proposed a smaller raise are not among the four seeking re-election.

At their current pace, they won’t take this up until after midnight, given the discussion about the equity policy that hasn’t even started yet.
Anonymous
At this pace they may push it to the next agenda. I’m surprised Meren is still awake and hasn’t stormed out by now.

Also, Rachna is an awful chair. She has no idea of any of the parliamentary procedures and is always constantly confused.
Anonymous
Motion: $60,404 (+$2000 for chair)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: n/a
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky, Omeish

Proposed Amendment: $48,000 (+$2,000 for chair) consistent with large paid boards (introduced by Derenak-Kaufax & seconded by Corbett-Sanders)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: Omeish
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky

Motion for more information during 3rd year with action in 4th year to explore comparison of salaries of similar sized Boards and THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. (LOL at them thinking leading a school district of 180K students is comparable to running an entire County full of services for 1.15Million residents)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Motion: $60,404 (+$2000 for chair)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: n/a
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky, Omeish

Proposed Amendment: $48,000 (+$2,000 for chair) consistent with large paid boards (introduced by Derenak-Kaufax & seconded by Corbett-Sanders)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: Omeish
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky

Motion for more information during 3rd year with action in 4th year to explore comparison of salaries of similar sized Boards and THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. (LOL at them thinking leading a school district of 180K students is comparable to running an entire County full of services for 1.15Million residents)


WTF. Can we vote to repeal their decision? I'm not paying for this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Motion: $60,404 (+$2000 for chair)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: n/a
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky, Omeish

Proposed Amendment: $48,000 (+$2,000 for chair) consistent with large paid boards (introduced by Derenak-Kaufax & seconded by Corbett-Sanders)
Yays: Everyone else
Nays: Omeish
Abstain: Meren, Pekarsky

Motion for more information during 3rd year with action in 4th year to explore comparison of salaries of similar sized Boards and THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. (LOL at them thinking leading a school district of 180K students is comparable to running an entire County full of services for 1.15Million residents)


WTF. Can we vote to repeal their decision? I'm not paying for this.


$48,000 is better than the $60,404 (the $48,000 is what was adopted, I believe)
Anonymous
Why are two people abstaining of four are running?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why are two people abstaining of four are running?


Because they don't want their political opponents to use it against them. Pekarsky is running for State Senate. Meren has an opponent for School Board. They are two of the most political on the Board along with Cohen and Frisch.
Anonymous
Don’t the other two running have the same needs? Is there an actual conflict of interest?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Don’t the other two running have the same needs? Is there an actual conflict of interest?


Maybe Pekarsky and Meren have higher household income and don't need a raise.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Don’t the other two running have the same needs? Is there an actual conflict of interest?


Maybe Pekarsky and Meren have higher household income and don't need a raise.


Bingo. Which is why they should’ve just raised their hands for the “optics” of saying, “yes we work long and hard hours and I am privileged to be able to do this work thanks to my husband’s salary.”

For the sake of EQUITY, they should’ve raised their hands! 😝 Single moms/dads, most blue collar/working-class folks cannot afford to settle to be paid the least.
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: