Because they don’t think their kid needs to be hothoused/tiger-mommed to succeed. I don’t necessarily share that view entirely but for various reasons we are trying it out. Believe me when I tell you some very, very bright kids will be going. |
You’re responding to me but it wasn’t my intention to imply your kid is not intelligent. I’m sure that there are some bright kids! I said that parents were comfortable sending them there because they weren’t that interested in making academics a priority. Those are two different things. You should also be aware that if you’re okay making academics less of a priority it’s possibly due to your massive privilege. I’m certain this isn’t the case for the non white kids that attend these schools. |
As a brown person, it’s always been my perception that these kids scoop up all the advantages that should be going to the brown kids, while allowing their parents to pretend to be super woke and brag to their other white friends. I find it disgusting. But that’s just my opinion (and I am totally certain I’m not alone!). |
That's an interesting perspective. One of the reasons we went private is because we don't want to do extensive supplementation/tiger-momming, and felt like that would be necessary if we went to our IB MS. |
What is the main roadblock? I keep hearing that it's been tried but there has to be something Hill families can do, unless it's just a waiting game...If it's an issue of UMC families being too small a slice in W6, then yes, I guess there's nothing to be done about that, but it seems like ending OOB and 'feeder right's would solve a lot of problems. Putting the onus on other, historically UMC wards to bridge the gap for quality education just doesn't make sense to me, and based on the scores, doesn't seem to be working... |
What specifically are those advantages, and why should they be going to "the brown kids"? |
There's a legal decree that DCPS has to offer its OOB seats in the lottery. They can't just stop. And it wouldn't work anyway-- if people IB for S-H lose their rights to go to better schools, they'll just move away. The thing that would work (sort of) is offering a lot of above-grade-level classes, but they're not willing to do that because the classes would be disproportionately white kids, and because it's expensive. So, here we are. |
There are some advantages to going to a poor school, such as specific internships ska scholarships. Those are geared towards the economically disadvantaged but the quiet parents scoop them all up since they know how to package their kids. I mean if you think this is ethical then good for you I guess? |
I think this is a fair point. |
It's unclear to me why an income qualification couldn't be written in to the internship or scholarship, or just make the application have an essay question about "overcoming hardship" or something. If they really wanted it to go entirely to low-income kids it's totally doable. |
That is some magical thinking. Everyone I know who is at Stuart Hobson either doesn’t care about academics at all (due to bigger problems or not being very motivated) or is desperately playing the lottery. I heard about this “trend” towards attending Stuart Hobson when my son started kindergarten in 2013. |
For some people, their kid is so far above, or so 2E or idiosyncratic in their abilities, that they're going to have to be heavily involved regardless of the school. |
Okay except that is not the reality. But you gotta white privilege and have no shame so you do you! |
This attitude for attending the school and then you have the Joe Wilson types calling you a racist for not attending. Lose-lose. |
Indeed it's not the reality, because that's not what the people offering the internships and scholarships decided to do. Perhaps it's them you should be attacking. |