|
What makes me sad about Bethany is that she does this for the attention. Years ago, I worked for a public health organization, and a fairly liberal one at that. She had a wonderful op-ed in the Washington post that we all loved about how to incentivize and increase childhood vaccine rates. Once she realized she got more money and views and clicks by being anti-vax, she decided to walk back her stance.
And as someone else said, she clearly reads here, so Bethany if you even try to say you aren’t anti-vax: You recently posted on your children’s book review account about “woke messaging” spotted at Barnes and Noble and one of the “woke” books you spotted was a board book about why it’s important to go to the doctor and get vaccines. |
Please stop making me laugh. Just had my weekly abortion and I’m a little sore. |
She’s especially bitter about abortions because as she’s said in the past, her own mother used them as birth control and had three. Putting your own mother’s medical decisions on blast via Twitter to own the libs >>>>>>> |
That’s what she does. She’s a hypocrite. Case in point: She claims that not all republicans should be defined by Jan. 6. Not every conservative supported the insurrection or even voted for Trump. Fine. But then she writes an ENTIRE book about how democrats are “woke” and uses the worst examples of chronically online liberals to illustrate her point. |
But why does this bother you so much? I agree the sign actually accomplishes little and the bank is likely a hypocrite on the matter. But it’s like reduce reuse recycle signs. It creates over time a new consciousness. Which again is useless unless paired with action. The land acknowledgments. Australia does this at the beginning of every meeting. Again not going to change anything but it is nice to honor our past. Again why does this bother you so much that anti-woke becomes a rallying cry and you then have to show proud and out racism to declare your fealty to your tribe? |
| I'll define woke. It is a belief that people are principally defined by their intersectional identities, and that it is correct and proper to divide people into classes according to race and sexual identity. Further, it is the belief that people are most likely to relate to these classes as their core identity, and as a result, it is best to relate to people through the lens of that identity rather than as an individual. |
Nope. Doesn't work. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/19/climate/companies-conservatives-attack.html |
Provide a counter definition or GTFO. |
This has still got to be Bethany. Please stop. You really are stretching it here. |
Sadly, I have been deprived of her Twitter takes. She blocked me after the last go-round with DCUM. |
It's already been given in this thread, genius. It's a catch all that conservatives use for what the "libs" do politically that they don't like. There really is no principled or coherent way to define it, as they use it, probably intentionally so. |
Uhhh, no. The point is "woke" is more expansive than just identity politics, unless you count "good card carrying liberal" as an identity. Ukraine, gun control and climate are not really identity politics, but are frequently referred to as woke. |
That would have gone over REAL well with the black woman |
Well, y'all think that conservatives are Christian hillbillies who sit around and watch Fox News all day so there you are! |
I don’t think that. Unlike republicans I’m not narrow minded. My ex-dh is a conservative Trump voter and actually he’s an atheist. Unlike Bethany I understand nuance. |