I think it's important to note that the people who will suffer the most from the great teacher resignation are children. I am a veteran teacher, I love my students, and I'm working hard to leave the field 5-10 years before I should retire. If I can find a job that works for me in another field, I'll take it. It will be of great personal cost to me in terms of loss of income and a reduced retirement. I'm willing to accept that. I'm a big girl and own my decisions. The problems that make me want to leave were in motion before the pandemic, though that certainly sped things up.
But I know that it will be my students who will bear the greatest cost. We have three classrooms with no teacher in my district. They are being staffed with a revolving door of subs. Some days, those students are split up between other classrooms. There are no replacements. I know my district is out of compliance in meeting special education minutes and we have kids with IEP's that dictate they have a 1:1 TA, but there are no TA's available, so they don't get their TA. Student safety is truly at risk, both to the kids who run out of the building and to the kids who are violent to others. Staff safety is at risk too. Teacher ed departments are closing at colleges. No one will sub. The more staff who leave means that more staff will leave. What is said on this board doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what I say and it doesn't matter what any parent says. What is happening in schools will happen regardless of what any of us think. Parents can be angry and teachers can be angry. But the nation's educational system is circling the drain and our children are bearing the brunt. It's pretty terrifying. |
You are acting like this is a threat to teachers. Who are you honestly hurting but kids? It is like in a divorce. If the parents are fighting over kids, custody or whatever in the end the KIDS are the ones who pay the price. The only thing you are really doing is hurting kids. Especially those who already start with fewer advantages. The teachers can and will find other work. The kids only get one shot at this and 2 years are already gone. You can take shots and get mad and kick and cry, or you can say “That sucked, but let’s get back to work. We have even more to do. How can I help?” |
No, I was trying to say public schools are threatened. If you care about protecting public schools then you should be looking for a path that not only meets the needs of teachers, but also students and their families. Otherwise more and more of those families are going to turn to private schools, which we're already seeing happening. That will only increase political support for private school vouchers. And yes, it's going to be the disadvantaged kids that lose out, not really the DCUM crowd. |
DCUM kids are generally in the top 5% of the nation economically. Most people who have left for private school already have. It's not just disadvantaged kids who will and are suffering, it's middle income and even upper middle income kids are too or at the very least, won't be able to afford even the cheapest of private schools. |
Ok then. WHO exactly should stand up for public schools and kids? Teachers are not able to fight back without being pilloried. So WHO? Unions aren’t taken seriously. Kids can’t speak on the political front. Who? |
Millions of teachers brought materials home. Sometimes swapping out items regularly. Maybe you teach lab science or auto repair? |
Teachers help through their jobs. Or, at least they should. Closing schools doesn’t build support for public schools. Encouraging school districts to add half-days to calendars, to limit hours while still meeting state requirements, doesn’t build support for public schools. Attacking parents who rely on schools doesn’t build support for public schools. Fighting attempts to reform teacher compensation, licensure, and recruiting doesn't build support for public education. |
Exactly. And those middle-income families rely on schools. That doesn't make them bad parents. The narrative that "school isn't child care" and that parents should have had backup plans for an 18-month school closure was a ridiculous attack on working families. |
What? That is the weirdest take on this I have ever seen. Are you suggesting schools closed just to “attack” families? Attack means there was malicious intent. Wow. That is NUTS! |
If the plan is to privatize education there won’t be enough teachers for charters and private schools at the rate people are leaving education and/or not entering it in college. There may be more autonomy for teachers in those settings but pay is often significantly lower without the benefit of large group insurance plans and state pensions. |
Read it again. The comments made by the teachers unions, and some teachers themselves, included attacks on working parents. There have been examples in this thread, although I tend to think they’re from SAHMs rather than teachers. |
I posted above. I am paid slightly less in my private school setting. I am no longer contributing to my pension, but my employer does contribute into a retirement plan for me. I value autonomy so much that I feel it is a good trade. Autonomy feels like respect, which I did not get in the public setting. |
Are you at a big, well regarded private school or a smaller one? |
I don’t agree with this at all. |
DP (18:35 here. ES Teacher) I posted earlier that my spouse and I both went into our schools. One reason we went into the building (in addition to simply being able to get out of the house) to teach online was because we did not want to bring the materials home. Why would we bring all of that home if we didn't have to? |