why is russia friendly with belarus but not ukraine?

[Anonymous]

I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Anyone defending the actions of the IRGC is not a serious person worthy of debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Anyone defending the actions of the IRGC is not a serious person worthy of debate.

Translation: only the white casualties count. Only the west decides who’s worthy of help. Annexation is ok as long as it’s taken from brown people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Iran 'helping' Yemenis?! You've having a laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Iran 'helping' Yemenis?! You've having a laugh.

Try sending some military supplies to Palestinians and get a visit from very friendly gentlemen from the Mossad. Let's see how your conviction that countries suffering brutal oppression ought to be helped will hold up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet Israel annexes Palestinian land every day inch by inch and I don't hear much about it, let alone Palestinian flags wrapped around trees in suburban DMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Iran 'helping' Yemenis?! You've having a laugh.

Try sending some military supplies to Palestinians and get a visit from very friendly gentlemen from the Mossad. Let's see how your conviction that countries suffering brutal oppression ought to be helped will hold up.

I’m confused. What’s Mossad got to do with Yemen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Anyone defending the actions of the IRGC is not a serious person worthy of debate.

Translation: only the white casualties count. Only the west decides who’s worthy of help. Annexation is ok as long as it’s taken from brown people.

Let's not ignore the whole Kosovo episode, which basically is a complete flip of the situation in Ukraine. If we had consistent principles, we would be returning that land to Serbia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Iran 'helping' Yemenis?! You've having a laugh.

Try sending some military supplies to Palestinians and get a visit from very friendly gentlemen from the Mossad. Let's see how your conviction that countries suffering brutal oppression ought to be helped will hold up.

I’m confused. What’s Mossad got to do with Yemen?

If you think that the world ought to band together to help militarily and otherwise to countries threatened by annexation and oppression by their neighbor....why is military aid to Palestine criminalized?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Anyone defending the actions of the IRGC is not a serious person worthy of debate.

Translation: only the white casualties count. Only the west decides who’s worthy of help. Annexation is ok as long as it’s taken from brown people.

Let's not ignore the whole Kosovo episode, which basically is a complete flip of the situation in Ukraine. If we had consistent principles, we would be returning that land to Serbia.

The whole notion of "self-determination" in the context of the so-called "rules-based order" (which really means that the West makes the rules AND the exceptions for their own benefit) is one big chunk of hypocrisy. There is no logical rhyme or reason as to why "the west" applauds the breakdown of some countries and attacks it in the others. Why was South Sudan allowed to split from its neighbor? Why were Eritrea and Ethiopia? Why is Turkey allowed to occupy North Cyprus? Why is Israel permitted to annex land at will? There are no good answers to this and we are helpless to change it. Mocking the notion of the "rules-based order" is the only thing left every time it comes up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, that someone is arguing Russia should be free to invade a neighboring country, murder children, rape women, level civilian homes, and yet finds it unfair that other countries provide military and civilian supplies against Russia?

Poor baby. Waaaaaaaa.

And yet when other countries provide military and civilian supplies to the Palestinians, you do just that. Oh and Iran helping Yemenis is a no no. I’ve said that before: only white casualties count.

Anyone defending the actions of the IRGC is not a serious person worthy of debate.

Translation: only the white casualties count. Only the west decides who’s worthy of help. Annexation is ok as long as it’s taken from brown people.

Let's not ignore the whole Kosovo episode, which basically is a complete flip of the situation in Ukraine. If we had consistent principles, we would be returning that land to Serbia.

That’s ridiculous in so many different levels.

[Anonymous]

It's the pro-Russian trolls misdirecting the thread. And you took the bait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the pro-Russian trolls misdirecting the thread. And you took the bait.

Yes god forbid you encounter a slight deviation from the DoS talking points.

[Anonymous]

"Russia is sending as many as 9,000 servicemen and hundreds of armored vehicles to Belarus, the Belarusian Defense Ministry said Monday."
"approximately “170 tanks, up to 200 armored combat vehicles, and up to 100 guns and mortars with a caliber of more than 100 mm"
https://www.thedailybeast.com/panic-as-vladimir-putin-drags-belarus-to-the-brink-of-russias-war-on-ukraine

"Military units from the formations are planned to be deployed at four training ranges of the Republic of Belarus in the eastern and central part of the country, after which they will start conducting combat training activities,"
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-10-17/belarus-to-hold-live-fire-exercises-with-russia

"A leading Belarusian political activist has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for opposing President Alexander Lukashenko’s regime"
"Along with Autukhovich, 11 other activists in Belarus were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 2½ to 20 years."
"Lukashenko has brutally suppressed months of protests that were fueled by his being awarded a sixth term in office in a 2020 presidential vote that was widely seen as rigged. More than 35,000 people were arrested and thousands beaten by police."
"The Viasna human rights center said Belarus has 1,340 political prisoners."
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/belarus-activist-25-year-sentence-opposing-regime-91621332