Elrich vs Sullivan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

Unless you have knowledge that Sully is a traitor and nazi sympathizer, you are a bigot.

Sully can choose whether or not to be a member of the Republican Party, which supports traitors and Nazis. Call me a bigot all you want, that's hilarious.

You judge someone by the group they belong to. Thats bigotry. Full stop. You may justify it to yourself by saying he can choose what groups he belongs to. But bottom line is you are looking at a party and not an individual. But if dehumanizing is your thing, so be it. Just own it.

So should we not judge members of the Proud Boys for being members of the Proud Boys because that is "bigotry"? GTFOOH.

Keep struggling.

You didn't answer my question. Is it bigotry to judge people for being part of White Supremacist groups?

Like antifa and blm.

Yep, there are tons of people that equate antifa and BLM with groups like the Proud Boys. Very few of them live in Montgomery County.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

There’s a lot of substance with Elrich and it isn’t good.

So you'd rather vote for someone who is clearly not qualified to be County Executive, and then lecture people for not paying attention to "politicians and their platforms"?

You are talking to a couple of people. We are not the same pp.

So what? Same issue - you think Elrich is bad. That doesn't mean Sully is good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

[Anonymous]

Sully is going to lose so bad, I love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

What’s Elrich’s plan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

I refer you to his page:
https://www.reardonsullivanformoco.com/issues/public-safety

We can assume that he is against Elrich’s “Reimagining Public Safety” recommendation of cutting MCPD staffing in Silver Spring and Wheaton by 50%. His references to supporting MCPD, especially in recruitment since the current council’s nonsense has decimated the department, are also compelling. It’s refreshing, actually, to see a Montgomery County page that doesn’t contain info about addressing crime by cutting officers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

What’s Elrich’s plan?

Once again, you can't justify voting for Sully based on Elrich's shortcomings. You don't like Elrich? Fine, don't vote for him. But don't pretend that Sully is a competent alternative. He's not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sully is going to lose so bad, I love it.

Meh. He will lose, but he might get more support than the usual Republican. Hogan lost to Jealous in MoCo but he still got over 40%. Sullivan might get close to Hogan numbers at best but thats still a loss by 10 points.

DCUM is not representative. In 2018, pretty much everyone on here supported Floreen and Hogan. They both lost (in MoCo) considerably.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

I refer you to his page:
https://www.reardonsullivanformoco.com/issues/public-safety

We can assume that he is against Elrich’s “Reimagining Public Safety” recommendation of cutting MCPD staffing in Silver Spring and Wheaton by 50%. His references to supporting MCPD, especially in recruitment since the current council’s nonsense has decimated the department, are also compelling. It’s refreshing, actually, to see a Montgomery County page that doesn’t contain info about addressing crime by cutting officers.

So he's against everything Elrich has done. What does that mean, specifically? He doesn't say what he is in favor of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

What’s Elrich’s plan?

Once again, you can't justify voting for Sully based on Elrich's shortcomings. You don't like Elrich? Fine, don't vote for him. But don't pretend that Sully is a competent alternative. He's not.

I love how you are deflecting.
What is Elrich’s plan? Crime is up under his administration. What is he going to do to bring it down?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

What’s Elrich’s plan?

Happy to help here: https://montgomerycountymd.gov/rps/Resources/Files/reports/rps-task-force-recommendations-report.pdf

Page 23:
“Move to fully ( or expanded) automated traffic enforcement through expansion of speed and intersection camera programs, and reduce FTE sworn officer positions across MCPD districts in proportion to the amount of officer time currently spent on in-person traffic enforcement by sworn officers.”

Page 25:
“Reduce sworn officer FTEs in police Districts 3 and 4 by 50 % to reduce patrol officer contact with residents in these districts.”

Page 26:
“Direct MCPD to treat all offenses in the “Crimes Against Society” segment, except for weapons violations, as the lowest department priority. When enforcement of these offenses does take place, MCPD should be directed to issue citations instead of making arrests.”

Page 34:
“Conduct a risk assessment of police activities to determine when it is necessary for officers to carry a gun.”

This is why Sullivan is appealing. Without balance, this is where we head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

I refer you to his page:
https://www.reardonsullivanformoco.com/issues/public-safety

We can assume that he is against Elrich’s “Reimagining Public Safety” recommendation of cutting MCPD staffing in Silver Spring and Wheaton by 50%. His references to supporting MCPD, especially in recruitment since the current council’s nonsense has decimated the department, are also compelling. It’s refreshing, actually, to see a Montgomery County page that doesn’t contain info about addressing crime by cutting officers.

So he's against everything Elrich has done. What does that mean, specifically? He doesn't say what he is in favor of.

I just posted from the task force findings. I’ve read that whole report and, frankly, I find it appalling. This is how Elrich plans to address rising crime. I don’t need Sullivan to say any more than he is against that plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Me and DH are Dems; we are voting for Sully.

I think he'll easily get 30 to 35% of the vote this year.

Similar to the percentage of voters that voted for Ficker and Floreen combined in 2018. That seems highly unlikely - Floreen was at least within the mainstream even if she didn't have a huge base of support. Sully is not mainstream, he thinks MCPS is teaching "graphic sexual material" to students. The material on his website is extremely poorly written, which tells me he has very little money to pay for people to help him. Remember, most voters don't even pay attention to local races, so they will just vote for the Democrat. And with the current state of the Republican party, I mean hell no. I don't vote for traitors and Nazi-sympathizers.

I left the Republican party (a while ago) because I did not belong in the same party as antisemitic, racist and Nazi sympathizers. But not everybody in the republican party is that. There are extremists in the Democratic Party too. Personally I think it is a detriment to our county, state and country to not pay attention to politicians and their platforms and to vote straight party tickets. I wish citizens would wake up and pay even a little bit of attention. This is why our country is so extreme and divided with our politicians. I think most people are somewhere in the middle with crossover beliefs both ways.

Really? You think voting for Sully is an informed choice? It doesn't take much time looking at his website to realize there isn'tuch substance there and there is a bit of crazy.

I looked at his website and I agree with his campaign priorities so he will get my vote. Don't care that he is R.

+1
I’m a moderate, but vote Democrat 80-90% of the time. Sullivan has my support. Elrich has proven to be bad for the county, and I would rather shake things up with some fresh ideas. There will still be a progressive council. I’ve seen Sullivan’s website and, while I’m not thrilled with the CRT reference, I like what I see elsewhere. I want somebody to address crime, and I know Elrich won’t do that.

What is Sully's plan to address crime? Spoiler alert! He doesn't have one. All he does is complain about how terrible a job the incumbents have done.

What’s Elrich’s plan?

Once again, you can't justify voting for Sully based on Elrich's shortcomings. You don't like Elrich? Fine, don't vote for him. But don't pretend that Sully is a competent alternative. He's not.

I love how you are deflecting.
What is Elrich’s plan? Crime is up under his administration. What is he going to do to bring it down?

Lol nice try. Go-ahead, vote for Sully, clearly that is what you want. He will.llse so badly because he has no real platform apart from being anti everything.