That is not an answer to the question. |
+1. Let’s rephrase the question: What is the reason to require children to eat outdoors in sub freezing temperatures? |
Not all kids are doing those things. Yours are, which makes it dangerous for the rest of us. |
It’s terrible, really? What about the kids who have parents with cancer or transplant or on immunosuppressants at home, or they are that? Stop making a public spectacle of yourself. Everyone else does the right thing without complaining because the have basic EQ and can read the room |
Let’s shut down in-person school and our children socializing. Forever. It’s dangerous. |
That’s the point. Everyone is rallying so that we are safe despite the children who can or wish to socializing outside of the school, and at school but safely. If my DCs complained about being outdoors for 20 minutes, I’d realize I have bigger problems. They’re as it happens well adjusted and popular athletes who in fact snowboard outdoors too (oh, the frozen toes)! Give it a break. |
To not be a d^ck |
It’s been two weeks Karen |
Indeed. Two weeks to stop the spread. |
Very persuasive and informative. You are quite the philosopher. Are your kids’ analytical skills this strong? |
Actually I found it a succinct and persuasive argument. Captured it all in five words. |
Well, it relies on circular reasoning. So it is inherently unpersuasive. |
Why don’t you just leave the school? You clearly hate the school and only post nasty things about it and trash the school to everyone and anyone that will listen. There are other schools in this area. |
I don’t think so. They ate inside this week and were given the option to eat outside under the tents with heaters if they wanted to. Many girls actually chose to eat outside under the tent with the heaters. |
This again. If you are a Sidwell parent, as I think you are, and you think that OP is talking about Sidwell, then you are certainly not being very Quakerly, and you are not trying to build consensus. |