Why so low? Are the law schools not interested in STEM focused undergrads? |
The low number of law students reflects the low number of STEM majors who apply to law school. |
Agree (I'm the PP you're responding to, BTW), but would just add that not all STEM majors who attend law school go into patent law. STEM majors typically do pretty well in law school and can write their own ticket -- or at least that was the case among my classmates (including DH) and also true for our DS, a recent law grad. |
Says the troll who claims Harvard has to "cast a wider net to fill its classes". Like Harvard has to do anything to fill its classes: "Harvard Law School received a total of 9,993 applications, up 33% over the 7,505 applications received a year earlier. The school admitted 685 candidates to get to its enrolled incoming class of 560 students for an acceptance rate of 6.9%, well below the 12.9% admit rate last year." |
No, only 28.4% https://law.yale.edu/student-life/career-development/employment-data/judicial-clerkship-employment. Harvard has 265 per year. https://hls.harvard.edu/dept/ocs/judicial-clerkships-from-hls/#hlsnav-recent-numbers. That would be more than half the graduating class. https://hls.harvard.edu/dept/ocs/judicial-clerkships-from-hls/#hlsnav-recent-numbers |
No STEM focused undergrads are not interested in law school. |
Recent-ish top law school grad. First answer above is correct; there were about a dozen bona fide STEM grads in my class of just under 200. Off the top of my head, only one or two of them ended up in hard IP practices. The two most common paths for that bunch seem to be high-end clerkship and litigation or tech-adjacent transactional practices. |
Liberal arts focused undergraduate degrees are common in top law schools. Business and Stem focused degrees are not common and outside of IP-focused practices often less valued. |
STEM focused undergraduates are common in top medical schools. The rest of the STEM undergraduates dwarfs the rest of the lberal arts failures LMFAO |
| We are back to the tired "feeder" argument, I see. Dear teenagers, please understand that T14 law school admission is a numbers game, college GPA and LSAT. "Feeders" are not a thing, no matter how much you would like to believe that. |
| I would actually add GPA matters so sometimes you have a better shot with a perfect GPA and honors/PBK from a lower ranked school. You also get great rec letters that way. |
OK TJ parent please have everyone do stem. workers are always needed for liberal arts major business owners. Everyone cant work in tech.. |
What percentage of the T14 admits have hooks of some kind? You often read in the press anecdotes about prominent so-and-so's child who is enrolled at one of these schools. What are the chances for the kid of a nobody like me, all other things being equal? |
|
To everyone saying LSAT > GPA >":
If your undergraduate GPA is rubbish, is there some scheme to go to do a one year graduate program? I know a handful of people who've picked up a seemingly random master's degree, then went to top 14 law schools. Is the undergraduate GPA not used if you have a master's? As in, you only use the most recent degree's GPA, i.e. master's program? |
I would just follow the example of a PP and try to transfer after first year— first year classes are mostly the same everywhere and you avoid the debt for an unnecessary masters degree. |