You have yet to provide any single medical source stating children who test positive for Covid are considered “healthy” and need not quarantine. The AAP makes it very clear that any child testing positive for Covid, regardless of vaccination status or whether they are asymptomatic, must isolate and quarantine. These are standard public health measures. The thought that some of you might intentionally send an infected child to school or out into the community is appalling. |
Do you test your child weekly for asymptomatic flu during flu season? If not, you're a morally reprehensible person. |
Just a friendly reminder - those of you volunteering your children for surveillance testing, you are the rare ones. The last testing regime only had 18% opt-in, and from what I understand some of that was because athletes were required to do so.
APS families, let's keep it up! We want under 10% this time. Fairfax had only 100 out of 179K students. We can do better by keeping our % down. |
DP. What a strange post. You are actually taking glee in two kids getting hurt academically by APS’s refusal to follow its own policies because you want to stick it to their parent for making a decision union you disagree with (but that is fully within their rights to make)? |
Testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus is not the same as “having Covid 19.” |
Unless you are testing daily then you, too, “might intentionally send an infected child to school or out into the community.” How appalling. |
Ah yes, here you go again with the flu as a red herring. "With COVID, there can be people who are completely asymptomatic who can infect other people. So, you can infect people with the flu before you’re symptomatic, but there really aren’t asymptomatic carriers of the flu” -UNC Health Care Chief Medical Officer Dr. David Ellis |
“Self righteous”? How? Never mind. Your definition is surely meaningless. |
I think that will be easy to achieve. |
Impressive commitment by posters to cheer a lack of testing for no good reason beyond that it seems to assuage their anger about something that most likely has little to do with a voluntary, opt-in, free testing program that doesn't impact anyone. Not sure who or what they're trying to dunk on, though. But it seems to make the posters feel better, so that's a good thing. |
DP. With Resource Path, the lack of transparency on how their algorithm would avoid false identification of students where a pool test threw a positive result left me uncomfortable with the reliability of their testing methodology. Has the new company provided more clarity on their testing procedures? |
Remember how last year people were pointing at private schools offering more in-person instruction and saying APS should follow their lead? |
Nope, APS didn't hurt these students, their parents did. Their parents made poor choices and it hurt their kids. |
Gmafb. |
Yup. Look at all of those private schools looking at going virtual now. |