|
Lawd. School has so darn little to do with education.
1. Agree with poster on page 1 re: open-book tests. Recall is a terrible measure of learning. 2. That it's a zero-sum game is such a tell. Learning is better when it's collaborative and cooperative. The game sucks. 3. As far as standardized tests go, SATs correlate more closely with zip codes than anything else. |
Easy solution - grade on a curve. IF they help others cheat, they're only hurting their own grade. |
It's because a 4.0 today is like a 3.0 from when you were. a kid. They just altered the scale. Same thing when they changed the SATs back in the 90s. |
How many high schoolers do you imagine actually have unique theses? Unless privates have changed a whole lot, they are reading canonical literature and studying major world events. Virtually any angle that you could approach any subject in either area has already been taken. |
Oh yeah, easy solution! Jeez, why didn't the people who do this for a living, every day, think of that! |
Now I know why my WL senior’s class rank is so low LOL (with 3.8 GPA). Still 3/3 on EA though. |
I’m not sure why people keep repeating this when all the evidence shows that it’s not true. There’s much more variance of standardized test scores in any SES decile than there is between the deciles. |
In other words, your child doesn't know how to work with a group, which is the point of the project. |
They don't see all the AP scores, and some schools no longer have APs, other have very few. |
One exception is a kid like mine who works hard and long to get a low A in math and then scores 83 percentile for math. Kid can do well in class by busting tail yet not reflected in standardized test. |
lol. child knows how to work...the group? sometimes and sometimes not....but the project always get completed either way. |
| SAT and Academic Success relates to the education level of the mother more than anything else. |
huh? then why do kids with the same mother score so differently? That is not accurate. |
No. My kid knows not to waste time. Most of the kids in his group are slackers who don't have a very bright future ahead of them. The group project is not going to be a transformative or life changing experience for the slackers. They are happy that they don't have to work and they think it is a win that they got an Easy A. The truth is that getting that A will not change their lives. They remain low achieving students. And to get an A because someone else worked for it probably is not a great feeling when they see it on their report card filled with Cs and Ds. Unfortunately, these are not kids who are good in anything else. Not only they are not good in studies, they are also not good in sports, painting, cooking, singing...nothing. It is like they have no interest and just wasting time. |
you seem to know way too much about some random students in one of you DCs classes. |