Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

For anyone who doesn't grasp just how huge Charlie Kirk was, and the potential TPUSA has going forward if well managed, should read this AP article: https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-turning-point-trump-cf2a68e4303c5628299ffe383d09c1e9

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

Given all of us can Google and given that he was killed before most of us were born (58 years ago), I'm curious as to why you think we would remember him? The PP only said that Charlie Kirk would be remembered for 20. I'm guessing the answer to your question would be different if you had asked it in 1987.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

Given all of us can Google and given that he was killed before most of us were born (58 years ago), I'm curious as to why you think we would remember him? The PP only said that Charlie Kirk would be remembered for 20. I'm guessing the answer to your question would be different if you had asked it in 1987.

I don't think so, really. I was 17 in 1987 and didn't have a clue about him - he certainly wasn't some kind of Jesus Christ-like figure to young people as some are predicting Charlie Kirk will be. Rockwell's shtick was in part going to college campuses, giving speeches and recruiting youth into the American Nazi Party.

Although given the rise of MAGA, mayhap his legacy was successful after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

She will be 100x more dangerous. Mark my words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

She will be 100x more dangerous. Mark my words.

Nah. This all loses a lot of steam without the carefully curated TikTok videos to farm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For anyone who doesn't grasp just how huge Charlie Kirk was, and the potential TPUSA has going forward if well managed, should read this AP article: https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-turning-point-trump-cf2a68e4303c5628299ffe383d09c1e9

I posted a few page back an opinion by a GenZ saying he successfully split their generation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

Still waiting for a citation for this bullshit claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For anyone who doesn't grasp just how huge Charlie Kirk was, and the potential TPUSA has going forward if well managed, should read this AP article: https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-turning-point-trump-cf2a68e4303c5628299ffe383d09c1e9

I posted a few page back an opinion by a GenZ saying he successfully split their generation.

Yes the RS piece - that was very good, thank you for sharing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For anyone who doesn't grasp just how huge Charlie Kirk was, and the potential TPUSA has going forward if well managed, should read this AP article: https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-turning-point-trump-cf2a68e4303c5628299ffe383d09c1e9

I posted a few page back an opinion by a GenZ saying he successfully split their generation.

I read the clip you posted and it’s my opinion that the author is misguided and biased. Charlie Kirk pointed out the craziness of the positions in the left. His goal was discourse in order to influence. He had very firmly held beliefs and he made no secret of that. He WANTED people to talk to others who disagreed with him.
I think the author is attributing comments of his friends in college to the influence of Charlie Kirk when Kirk’s goal was just the opposite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the people claiming that a foreign nation did this, this is all a grift. This murder was simply grifters fighting amongst themselves? Grifters clawing for the top spot and hiding the Epstein files. This had nothing to do with anything or anyone else, it’s not left vs right, gun control, gay/trans. It’s individuals fighting for control and desperately trying to control the narrative.

I have no idea what your point is but you sound like you’re promoting a conspiracy theory.

Yes. Everything seems like a big conspiracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For anyone who doesn't grasp just how huge Charlie Kirk was, and the potential TPUSA has going forward if well managed, should read this AP article: https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-turning-point-trump-cf2a68e4303c5628299ffe383d09c1e9

I posted a few page back an opinion by a GenZ saying he successfully split their generation.

Yes the RS piece - that was very good, thank you for sharing it.

Would one of you mind linking to it again?

[Anonymous]

Wondering if Kirk’s memorial service will be more lit than Paul Wellstone’s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk Divided My Generation. His Death Is Making It Worse
The conservative activist has shaped political opinions within Gen Z. I fear his assassination may push us past the brink

""Charlie Kirk was the one who stood up for us, and that's why these radical leftists had to take him out," remarked one of my fellow football players at my staunchly conservative college. He wasn't the only one. Many teammates were rightfully mad. But instead of directing their anger toward only the killer, they blamed everyone on the left for the actions of one fringe individual. This instinct to condemn the whole other side for the actions of one crazy person isn't new; and it sows seeds of hatred that only deepen our divides."

...

"I'm in a unique spot to see this picture. I recently graduated from a conservative all-boys high school in Chicago, and now I attend a right-leaning Southern college, playing football at both. In these places, I've learned to keep my liberal politics hidden. I first heard of Kirk when I was in middle school, but his name blew up by the time I reached high school, starting with my freshman year, when a friend showed me a viral clip of him debating a "woke" college student on abortion rights and completely dismantling her argument. From that moment, it felt like everyone I knew had seen him.

Living in conservative spaces has showed me something worrisome about how my generation treats disagreement. It's not just that I'm outnumbered, it's that I've heard teammates and friends say they've never had a Democrat friend before because "those Democrats hate our country" and you "can't befriend evil." Those comments are more than political disagreements; they're seeds of hatred that grow into distrust and dehumanization. When you see someone as hating your country, you stop seeing them as a person who can be reasoned with, and mistakenly begin thinking that violence is the only way."

https://apple.news/ARXUDVtXESWW6lRpxcfNIdg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

Still waiting for a citation for this bullshit claim.

Nobody gives an eff what you want or think. You probably couldn't read it even if someone provided it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Charlie who?