The Mueller Report

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Lordy, there’s a tape.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Clearly, the SC did not think this arose to the level of obstruction or they would have charged someone.


Clearly you haven't read the report.
Anonymous
DC judge orders USDOJ to post public transcript of Michael Flynn voicemail that purports to capture Trump/ Congress efforts "that could have affected both his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation."


Judge Sullivan has also ordered that all the redactions in the Mueller Report regarding Flynn be made public.
Anonymous
Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Lordy, there’s a tape.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Lordy, there’s a tape.


Awesome! Let’s impeach now so the senate can clear trump and we can put this farce behind us.
Except we can’t because bill Barr just called in the big three to start asking questions about the origins of the probe. Here we go!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Awesome! Let’s impeach now so the senate can clear trump and we can put this farce behind us.
Except we can’t because bill Barr just called in the big three to start asking questions about the origins of the probe. Here we go!!


You understand the rule of law and our law enforcement infrastructure is being completely undermined by this president, right?
Anonymous
The position of Trump and the White House is this: It is not a legitimate legislative purpose for Congress to further flesh out special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s findings with the goal of fortifying our election security against future outside attacks on our political system.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/17/white-houses-latest-mueller-absurdity-is-shocking-even-trump/

Do Trump supporters agree with this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....


Post reporting on Dowd-Flynn call:

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....


Dowd was all in

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-lawyer-wrote-presidents-sloppy-tweet-flynns-dismissal/story


He should be disbarred and prosecuted.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....


Dowd was all in

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-lawyer-wrote-presidents-sloppy-tweet-flynns-dismissal/story


He should be disbarred and prosecuted.


Could his be one of the dozen or so investigations that spawned from the Mueller report that are still supposedly ongoing?
Anonymous
Justin Amash (R-MI) becomes the first Republican to openly call for Trum's impeachment.

https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1129831615952236546
Anonymous
Ok, here is my question. When politicos say the report doesn’t warrant looking into impeachment, are they just assuming that no one has read it? Ffs.
I wasn’t going to read it at first, I’m tired of watching our country swirl down the crapper. But I changed my mind & dug in. Mostly because I don’t want someone else to tell me how to feel about an issue.
If you don’t have time to read it- there is a free audio podcast. No political commentary. Just a dude reading the report. Do the work & think for yourself
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok, here is my question. When politicos say the report doesn’t warrant looking into impeachment, are they just assuming that no one has read it? Ffs.
I wasn’t going to read it at first, I’m tired of watching our country swirl down the crapper. But I changed my mind & dug in. Mostly because I don’t want someone else to tell me how to feel about an issue.
If you don’t have time to read it- there is a free audio podcast. No political commentary. Just a dude reading the report. Do the work & think for yourself


Literally, you have to have not read it to make the conclusion that there isn't enough there for impeachment and removal from office and criminal investigations.

Given Barr's response to Booker mentioning the Gates/Manafort passing polling data to Klimnick, it is clear Barr hadn't read it either.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: