New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ECNL has not taken a hit….losing McLean does nothing.

You are hoping it does nothing. There is a chance it does something otherwise why would McLean do it? You have to at least acknowledge there is a chance it does something. Maybe the chances are 50/50, maybe 70/30, but it's not nothing. History tells us the girls soccer landscape will not look the same as it does now for very long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ECNL has not taken a hit….losing McLean does nothing.

[Anonymous]

Things will tingly change if

1.ecnl or mls play hardball
2. ga keeps coming for more ECRL clubs and take some $$$ away from Ecnl
3. Nwsl aligns with mls and the MLSn network

[Anonymous]

Probably true for most but without outing myself definetly read the tea leaves a year ago that these alliances don't work unless partner clubs are equally inferior. This is why VDA works and Union and NVA have not worked. Loudoun and McLean egos are too big to function in any alliance or union. Their ability to pivot to their own entity and in a competitor league must be pretty terrfying to ECNL brass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ECNL has not taken a hit….losing McLean does nothing.

You are hoping it does nothing. There is a chance it does something otherwise why would McLean do it? You have to at least acknowledge there is a chance it does something. Maybe the chances are 50/50, maybe 70/30, but it's not nothing. History tells us the girls soccer landscape will not look the same as it does now for very long.

You are correct about that. And from what it looks like, GA is looking to rebuild a better version of DA.

I bet all of the old DA clubs are sitting back watching and waiting for “the call”.

There was always a plan to rebuild GDA and what you are witnessing is just that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Probably true for most but without outing myself definetly read the tea leaves a year ago that these alliances don't work unless partner clubs are equally inferior. This is why VDA works and Union and NVA have not worked. Loudoun and McLean egos are too big to function in any alliance or union. Their ability to pivot to their own entity and in a competitor league must be pretty terrfying to ECNL brass.

Yep, clubs all over are watching. Seeing clubs break free, have a little more freedom, and having two different entities (MLSN+ga) manage the leagues and clubs. wonder how many ECNL kids in areas like south FL and SoCal would love to play MLSN.

[Anonymous]

Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

ECNL is superior as they have roughly 85% or more top clubs in the country on the girls side.

But no your comment is not necessarily correct.

There are some ECRL programs that are much stronger than current ECNL clubs.

The issue is that ECNL will not (for unknown reasons) promote said clubs.

(See Kansas City Scott Gallagher).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Things will tingly change if

1.ecnl or mls play hardball
2. ga keeps coming for more ECRL clubs and take some $$$ away from Ecnl
3. Nwsl aligns with mls and the MLSn network

1. Not everyone can be mls
2. Ga bringing in 2nd teams from ecnlr does not make ga better. Maybe in volume but not quality.
3. What incentive does Nwsl have to align with mls. I can point out a few different reasons why the Nwsl is better off staying in their own lane

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

In this world that can quickly change, strength + strength doesn't always make things better. These moves are for the future. Look at SYC for example, first year in GA and their two strongest teams are their two youngest, the rest are about middle of the pack because impact players U15+ aren't necessarily looking to be on the move to GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Things will tingly change if

1.ecnl or mls play hardball
2. ga keeps coming for more ECRL clubs and take some $$$ away from Ecnl
3. Nwsl aligns with mls and the MLSn network

It's also clubs with an average girls ECNL program and an above average boys ECNL program. (Which applies to all kinds of clubs.)

In this situation it 100% makes sense to switch over to GA/MLSN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

ECNL is superior as they have roughly 85% or more top clubs in the country on the girls side.

But no your comment is not necessarily correct.

There are some ECRL programs that are much stronger than current ECNL clubs.

The issue is that ECNL will not (for unknown reasons) promote said clubs.

(See Kansas City Scott Gallagher).

Yes they are superior right now (or girls not boys. But what exactly makes them superior? Is there a special formula or sauce that ECNL has that other leagues do not? No, the only thing that makes them superior is that they have more of ther top clubs. If clubs find a better deal somewhere else and leave, ECNL is not superior anymore. Maybe ECNL got too dominant and clubs had no say anymore, forcing them into alliances they didn't want to do, forcing them to have boys teams, and now given the chance the clubs who are strong enough to break off are doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Things will tingly change if

1.ecnl or mls play hardball
2. ga keeps coming for more ECRL clubs and take some $$$ away from Ecnl
3. Nwsl aligns with mls and the MLSn network

1. Not everyone can be mls
2. Ga bringing in 2nd teams from ecnlr does not make ga better. Maybe in volume but not quality.
3. What incentive does Nwsl have to align with mls. I can point out a few different reasons why the Nwsl is better off staying in their own lane

1. They can be if it’s tiered.
2. That’s interesting. Go look at a couple of ECRL clubs (1st team) records.

Team Boca, Coastal Rush, and Sunrise surf are great examples of clubs that could beat and are probably better than NL clubs (tbu, fl west, sc united, Orlando city)…

You are down playing clubs in ECRL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

ECNL is superior as they have roughly 85% or more top clubs in the country on the girls side.

But no your comment is not necessarily correct.

There are some ECRL programs that are much stronger than current ECNL clubs.

The issue is that ECNL will not (for unknown reasons) promote said clubs.

(See Kansas City Scott Gallagher).

Yes they are superior right now (or girls not boys. But what exactly makes them superior? Is there a special formula or sauce that ECNL has that other leagues do not? No, the only thing that makes them superior is that they have more of ther top clubs. If clubs find a better deal somewhere else and leave, ECNL is not superior anymore. Maybe ECNL got too dominant and clubs had no say anymore, forcing them into alliances they didn't want to do, forcing them to have boys teams, and now given the chance the clubs who are strong enough to break off are doing it.

The GA koolaid is strong today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Casual observer. Listening to the arguments of which is better ECNL or GA. If GA is adding ECRL clubs to the GA platform doesn’t that lead to ECNL being superior?

ECNL is superior as they have roughly 85% or more top clubs in the country on the girls side.

But no your comment is not necessarily correct.

There are some ECRL programs that are much stronger than current ECNL clubs.

The issue is that ECNL will not (for unknown reasons) promote said clubs.

(See Kansas City Scott Gallagher).

Yes they are superior right now (or girls not boys. But what exactly makes them superior? Is there a special formula or sauce that ECNL has that other leagues do not? No, the only thing that makes them superior is that they have more of ther top clubs. If clubs find a better deal somewhere else and leave, ECNL is not superior anymore. Maybe ECNL got too dominant and clubs had no say anymore, forcing them into alliances they didn't want to do, forcing them to have boys teams, and now given the chance the clubs who are strong enough to break off are doing it.

The GA koolaid is strong today

nah, just reality. Who knows..ECNL may drop an announcement today.