Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

Yes. The point I was making was also that Donald Trump IS one of those monsters.

Adding:

And thus isn't going to prosecute anyone for crimes he also committed. He's already completely purged and politicized the DOJ so who, again is going to prosecute?

Britain is getting rid of their Prime Minister. We in the US are continuing as if this is business as usual. Because it is for Trump.

The lawyers working feverishly to redact the names of child rapists are protecting child rapists. Sorry that obvious fact needs to be explained to you.

What kind of straw man argument are you having dude? I'm on your team and nothing I said contradicted anything you said.

Sorry you're so dense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

Yes. The point I was making was also that Donald Trump IS one of those monsters.

Adding:

And thus isn't going to prosecute anyone for crimes he also committed. He's already completely purged and politicized the DOJ so who, again is going to prosecute?

Britain is getting rid of their Prime Minister. We in the US are continuing as if this is business as usual. Because it is for Trump.

The lawyers working feverishly to redact the names of child rapists are protecting child rapists. Sorry that obvious fact needs to be explained to you.

What kind of straw man argument are you having dude? I'm on your team and nothing I said contradicted anything you said.

Sorry you're so dense.

Those lawyers work for the DOJ which is working for Trump and they are not the lawyers representing the people in the files. They are two different sets of lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

The Epstein Class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

Correct. DOJ is doing Find and Redacted “don’t” or Don T, short for Donald Trump. Screenshots are floating on socials. Hack jobs because we can now just use common sense to find him. But then, how often does Trump get referred to as Don. T?

[Anonymous]

I think it's amazing that Christian evangelicals have gone from "protecting the family" to we are pedo protectors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We can only take out the trash if we keep Epstein on the front page. For obvious reasons the pedophile in chief thinks we should all move on and this should be e more than enough to tell us he is scared $hitless!

There is a website that allows you search Epstein’s emails as if it were a Gmail inbox.
https://www.jmail.world/

Wow. I just entered “Karp” and there’s a message showing Brad Karp of Paul Weiss was arranging meetings with JE in 2018.

Yes there’s a ton of info about this in the Paul Weiss thread here https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1264669.page He’s resigned as chairman but I doubt that’s the end of it.

I think I somehow missed how recent the meetings were. He’s only resigned from the face of the firm - he’s still there and has all of his shares right? Some of these mfrs are going to try and ride this out.

They really seem to think this is business as usual. And, I mean, unless they actually get forced out of their positions of power, I guess it is.

I also found the father of a friend from college. So weird. Hope I don't know anyone else connected to this.

What made you search the name?

I read Jen Gunter’s piece on her substack about Peter Attia. She’s smart so she has appropriate disdain for longevity influencers. Attia prescribed Clomid to Epstein which is used presumably off label for testosterone production. I know it as a drug in fertility treatment.

Gunter made a haunting point in the comments. Basic but hard to accept. All of these interactions legitimized Epstein and let him abuse more kids, and I’d argue that goes for keeping Maxwell in polite society. The Clintons permitting Ghislane Maxwell to attend as a +1 at Chelsea’s wedding - widely covered - after JE’s sex offense conviction is totally totally insane. There is no way at all that they both would not have known that. No way. There are ten thousand examples of this but I’m highlighting this because I refuse to pretend that the Clintons are maligned heroes in this.

https://vajenda.substack.com/p/doj-released-files-include-emails/comments?utm_source=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

I don’t think anyone is defending Bill Clinton.

Many socials are praising the Clintons right now for agreeing to testify and insisting that it is public. I can't believe she was allowed to attend.

You are not very bright. They’re cheering this on because it is the first step in ordering Trump to testify. He will be subpoenaed to testify the minute he leaves office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it's amazing that Christian evangelicals have gone from "protecting the family" to we are pedo protectors.

The way they've embraced the criminal Russian agenda is also astounding. I have MAGA relatives as do many others. I spent years listening to them rail on about the Russians and how much they loved Reagan. How was it so shallow? Or are they quietly re-thinking their Trump support. now? One can only hope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Qanon got real quiet.

QAnon was invented by an Epstein associate.

Not just QAnon but many of the absolute worst things that happened to the internet and social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's amazing that Christian evangelicals have gone from "protecting the family" to we are pedo protectors.

The way they've embraced the criminal Russian agenda is also astounding. I have MAGA relatives as do many others. I spent years listening to them rail on about the Russians and how much they loved Reagan. How was it so shallow? Or are they quietly re-thinking their Trump support. now? One can only hope.

Christian evangelicals have embraced the Israeli agenda far more than the so called "Russian agenda". It's why many big names have stayed silent as these files have been released.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We can only take out the trash if we keep Epstein on the front page. For obvious reasons the pedophile in chief thinks we should all move on and this should be e more than enough to tell us he is scared $hitless!

There is a website that allows you search Epstein’s emails as if it were a Gmail inbox.
https://www.jmail.world/

Wow. I just entered “Karp” and there’s a message showing Brad Karp of Paul Weiss was arranging meetings with JE in 2018.

Yes there’s a ton of info about this in the Paul Weiss thread here https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1264669.page He’s resigned as chairman but I doubt that’s the end of it.

I think I somehow missed how recent the meetings were. He’s only resigned from the face of the firm - he’s still there and has all of his shares right? Some of these mfrs are going to try and ride this out.

They really seem to think this is business as usual. And, I mean, unless they actually get forced out of their positions of power, I guess it is.

I also found the father of a friend from college. So weird. Hope I don't know anyone else connected to this.

What made you search the name?

I read Jen Gunter’s piece on her substack about Peter Attia. She’s smart so she has appropriate disdain for longevity influencers. Attia prescribed Clomid to Epstein which is used presumably off label for testosterone production. I know it as a drug in fertility treatment.

Gunter made a haunting point in the comments. Basic but hard to accept. All of these interactions legitimized Epstein and let him abuse more kids, and I’d argue that goes for keeping Maxwell in polite society. The Clintons permitting Ghislane Maxwell to attend as a +1 at Chelsea’s wedding - widely covered - after JE’s sex offense conviction is totally totally insane. There is no way at all that they both would not have known that. No way. There are ten thousand examples of this but I’m highlighting this because I refuse to pretend that the Clintons are maligned heroes in this.

https://vajenda.substack.com/p/doj-released-files-include-emails/comments?utm_source=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

I don’t think anyone is defending Bill Clinton.

Many socials are praising the Clintons right now for agreeing to testify and insisting that it is public. I can't believe she was allowed to attend.

You are not very bright. They’re cheering this on because it is the first step in ordering Trump to testify. He will be subpoenaed to testify the minute he leaves office.

I was responding to a previous post. Try to keep up. Of course it is great that they are asking to testify publicly. Will it happen? Who knows? They are both very smart and will make a mockery of this administration if allowed to testify so it probably won't happen. Doesn't excuse the fact that Maxwell was allowed at the wedding.

[Anonymous]

Why are there so many insults being thrown at posters on this thread. I suspect troll interference. Everyone here wants justice to be served. don't let the troll farms divide us on a unanimous issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

I don't understand this.

if you are using software to search for and redact Don T, you will also redact the misspelling of the word don't- lots of people skip apostrophes in email. Just another example of the redactions protecting the wrong people.

I feel stupid! Thanks for explaining this obvious reason without calling me an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I know it's just a television show but "Mayor of Kingstown" starring Jeremy Renner made politicians, prison unions, and inmates casually ordering hits, retaliation, etc. inside of a prison seem very believable. Same for "The Wire," which cops, corrections officers, politicians, and reporters are on record saying is one of the most realistic shows in television history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

I don't understand this.

if you are using software to search for and redact Don T, you will also redact the misspelling of the word don't- lots of people skip apostrophes in email. Just another example of the redactions protecting the wrong people.

I feel stupid! Thanks for explaining this obvious reason without calling me an idiot.

You shouldn't have to thank me for that. A lot of name calling on this thread that is not necessary.