Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m glad some countries are taking this seriously! America is just a den of corruption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m glad some countries are taking this seriously! America is just a den of corruption.

Ideally they will all share intel and come up with giant joint body of evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We can only take out the trash if we keep Epstein on the front page. For obvious reasons the pedophile in chief thinks we should all move on and this should be e more than enough to tell us he is scared $hitless!

There is a website that allows you search Epstein’s emails as if it were a Gmail inbox.
https://www.jmail.world/

Wow. I just entered “Karp” and there’s a message showing Brad Karp of Paul Weiss was arranging meetings with JE in 2018.

Yes there’s a ton of info about this in the Paul Weiss thread here https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1264669.page He’s resigned as chairman but I doubt that’s the end of it.

I think I somehow missed how recent the meetings were. He’s only resigned from the face of the firm - he’s still there and has all of his shares right? Some of these mfrs are going to try and ride this out.

They really seem to think this is business as usual. And, I mean, unless they actually get forced out of their positions of power, I guess it is.

I also found the father of a friend from college. So weird. Hope I don't know anyone else connected to this.

What made you search the name?

I read Jen Gunter’s piece on her substack about Peter Attia. She’s smart so she has appropriate disdain for longevity influencers. Attia prescribed Clomid to Epstein which is used presumably off label for testosterone production. I know it as a drug in fertility treatment.

Gunter made a haunting point in the comments. Basic but hard to accept. All of these interactions legitimized Epstein and let him abuse more kids, and I’d argue that goes for keeping Maxwell in polite society. The Clintons permitting Ghislane Maxwell to attend as a +1 at Chelsea’s wedding - widely covered - after JE’s sex offense conviction is totally totally insane. There is no way at all that they both would not have known that. No way. There are ten thousand examples of this but I’m highlighting this because I refuse to pretend that the Clintons are maligned heroes in this.

https://vajenda.substack.com/p/doj-released-files-include-emails/comments?utm_source=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

I don’t think anyone is defending Bill Clinton.

Many socials are praising the Clintons right now for agreeing to testify and insisting that it is public. I can't believe she was allowed to attend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We can only take out the trash if we keep Epstein on the front page. For obvious reasons the pedophile in chief thinks we should all move on and this should be e more than enough to tell us he is scared $hitless!

There is a website that allows you search Epstein’s emails as if it were a Gmail inbox.
https://www.jmail.world/

Thanks for sharing. Everyone- please post broadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m glad some countries are taking this seriously! America is just a den of corruption.

Ideally they will all share intel and come up with giant joint body of evidence.

Yes, but as has been made abundantly clear, no rich and powerful man in America is getting prosecuted for their crimes in America. The UK, France, even Brazil, have much stronger justice systems than the US does. Whereas here, nothing happened under Merrick Garland. And nothing will happen under Pam Bondi. The entire Epstein network of evil men walks very free in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

[Anonymous]

Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

I don't understand this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We can only take out the trash if we keep Epstein on the front page. For obvious reasons the pedophile in chief thinks we should all move on and this should be e more than enough to tell us he is scared $hitless!

There is a website that allows you search Epstein’s emails as if it were a Gmail inbox.
https://www.jmail.world/

Wow. I just entered “Karp” and there’s a message showing Brad Karp of Paul Weiss was arranging meetings with JE in 2018.

Yes there’s a ton of info about this in the Paul Weiss thread here https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1264669.page He’s resigned as chairman but I doubt that’s the end of it.

I think I somehow missed how recent the meetings were. He’s only resigned from the face of the firm - he’s still there and has all of his shares right? Some of these mfrs are going to try and ride this out.

They really seem to think this is business as usual. And, I mean, unless they actually get forced out of their positions of power, I guess it is.

I also found the father of a friend from college. So weird. Hope I don't know anyone else connected to this.

What made you search the name?

I read Jen Gunter’s piece on her substack about Peter Attia. She’s smart so she has appropriate disdain for longevity influencers. Attia prescribed Clomid to Epstein which is used presumably off label for testosterone production. I know it as a drug in fertility treatment.

Gunter made a haunting point in the comments. Basic but hard to accept. All of these interactions legitimized Epstein and let him abuse more kids, and I’d argue that goes for keeping Maxwell in polite society. The Clintons permitting Ghislane Maxwell to attend as a +1 at Chelsea’s wedding - widely covered - after JE’s sex offense conviction is totally totally insane. There is no way at all that they both would not have known that. No way. There are ten thousand examples of this but I’m highlighting this because I refuse to pretend that the Clintons are maligned heroes in this.

https://vajenda.substack.com/p/doj-released-files-include-emails/comments?utm_source=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

I don’t think anyone is defending Bill Clinton.

Many socials are praising the Clintons right now for agreeing to testify and insisting that it is public. I can't believe she was allowed to attend.

I would love it if the Clintons would be the ones to finally bring Trump down.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/02/05/hillary-bill-clinton-jeffrey-epstein-hearing/88526435007/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting note on reddit sub that various versions of the word "don't" are obviously redacted from sentences. Obvious forms and misspellings: don't, dont, don t...

More suspicious is that people are questioning why the posters account was deleted or banned after sharing this.

I don't understand this.

if you are using software to search for and redact Don T, you will also redact the misspelling of the word don't- lots of people skip apostrophes in email. Just another example of the redactions protecting the wrong people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

Yes. The point I was making was also that Donald Trump IS one of those monsters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

Yes. The point I was making was also that Donald Trump IS one of those monsters.

Adding:

And thus isn't going to prosecute anyone for crimes he also committed. He's already completely purged and politicized the DOJ so who, again is going to prosecute?

Britain is getting rid of their Prime Minister. We in the US are continuing as if this is business as usual. Because it is for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the takeaways I have from this is that morality and basic decency are not values of most extremely rich people. They are working, middle, and UMC values, but not the values of the uber wealthy.

What class do the lawyers who are currently protecting these monsters belong to?

Protecting them from what? You think that Donald Trump of all people is trying to get some evidence together for a prosecution? What planet are you living on. He doesn't care.

You’re very dumb to arrive at this conclusion. (Hint: Donald Trump IS one of these monsters.)

Seriously, this response is breathtakingly stupid. Can you even tie your own shoes?

Yes. The point I was making was also that Donald Trump IS one of those monsters.

Adding:

And thus isn't going to prosecute anyone for crimes he also committed. He's already completely purged and politicized the DOJ so who, again is going to prosecute?

Britain is getting rid of their Prime Minister. We in the US are continuing as if this is business as usual. Because it is for Trump.

The lawyers working feverishly to redact the names of child rapists are protecting child rapists. Sorry that obvious fact needs to be explained to you.