Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ (that bastion of liberal fake news owned by Newscorp, parent of FOX) is reporting that these IC has proof of Russian-Trump collusion going back to 2015.

Who wants to defend this?

Link?

Wall Street Journal. I think you can find it.

You can't be bothered to post a link to the story you just cited?

[Anonymous]

Np.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-officials-overheard-discussing-trump-associates-before-campaign-began-1499890354

Here ya go whiner. Your Republican Party is a cohort of worthless criminals.

[Anonymous]

To paraphrase McCain, the centipede keeps dropping shoes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Np.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-officials-overheard-discussing-trump-associates-before-campaign-began-1499890354

Here ya go whiner. Your Republican Party is a cohort of worthless criminals.

Same poster: read the comments. Look at how rabid Trump supporters are screaming about the IC and not Trump. We are in two f'ing Americas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Np.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-officials-overheard-discussing-trump-associates-before-campaign-began-1499890354

Here ya go whiner. Your Republican Party is a cohort of worthless criminals.

Dang! It's behind a paywall. I'd love to read the comments from our patriotic Trumpkins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Np.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-officials-overheard-discussing-trump-associates-before-campaign-began-1499890354

Here ya go whiner. Your Republican Party is a cohort of worthless criminals.

Dang! It's behind a paywall. I'd love to read the comments from our patriotic Trumpkins.

I think that was just an ad you can close -- I was able to read the article and am now moving onto the comments.

[Anonymous]

Sometimes for a laugh I go over to Fox News to see how they are covering stuff. It is truly pathetic. One of their top stories right now headlines that "heads will roll" because Trump is unhappy with people leaking information related to his son's meeting. Uh, dude, the leaker is your F'ING SON. A little snippet for your entertainment:

President Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski predicted Wednesday that the leakers driving coverage of Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting last year with a Russian lawyer will be fired, as the White House reportedly scrambles to find the source or sources.

“Anybody, and I mean anybody who is not on the president’s agenda that works in this administration should absolutely be removed immediately,” Lewandowski told “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday morning.

“I don’t know who the leaker is but let me tell you this, if it were up to me, and somebody was speaking to the media [and leaking information detrimental to Trump], I would fire them on the spot, and Donald Trump will do the same,” he added.

[Anonymous]

From the WSJ article...

It isn’t clear which Trump associates or advisers the Russians were referring to, or whether they had any connection to his presidential aspirations.

The U.S. intelligence agencies weren’t sure what to make of the vague and inconclusive information, given that Mr. Trump had done business in Russia and was a global celebrity well-known to prominent people there. The names of Americans do sometimes show up in conversations involving Russian officials that are overheard by U.S. intelligence.

Just another non news story with sensationalist headline

[Anonymous]

Like this gem of a comment:

How unfortunate for the WSJ to run this zany front page hit piece of double uncorroborated heresay. What evidence exists that the Russians did in fact fish password=password Podesta and the forbidden access DNC server?

Why no discussion of the DNC meta data that documents that the 'hacker' was a DNC credentialed user downloading gigs onto a memory stick from the DNC internal network?

Who in Obama's intel agency unmasked Trump from 2015 and a year before his candidacy?

More importantly, why doesn't the WSJ tell its readers the insider stock info that circulates in their newsroom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From the WSJ article...

It isn’t clear which Trump associates or advisers the Russians were referring to, or whether they had any connection to his presidential aspirations.

The U.S. intelligence agencies weren’t sure what to make of the vague and inconclusive information, given that Mr. Trump had done business in Russia and was a global celebrity well-known to prominent people there. The names of Americans do sometimes show up in conversations involving Russian officials that are overheard by U.S. intelligence.

Just another non news story with sensationalist headline

Didn't Trump swear up, down, and sideways that he had no business in Russia?

[Anonymous]

Okay I can't read anymore. Like being on DCUM but more concentrated:

Well, U.S. intelligence community, now that you have, with such disclosures as those mentioned in this article, abandoned your duty not to make public intercepted U.S. citizen conversations with foreigners, start releasing publicly your intercepts on Clinton and Obama clique conversations with Russians, Chinese, etc.
In fact, while your at it, release all your intercepts of Terry McAuliffe talking with his ChiCom business partners. That would be interesting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the WSJ article...

It isn’t clear which Trump associates or advisers the Russians were referring to, or whether they had any connection to his presidential aspirations.

The U.S. intelligence agencies weren’t sure what to make of the vague and inconclusive information, given that Mr. Trump had done business in Russia and was a global celebrity well-known to prominent people there. The names of Americans do sometimes show up in conversations involving Russian officials that are overheard by U.S. intelligence.

Just another non news story with sensationalist headline

Didn't Trump swear up, down, and sideways that he had no business in Russia?

https://www.google.com/search?q=i+have+nothing+to+do+with+russia&oq=i+have&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i60l3.1267j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

That is merely something to not take literally. Trump being Trump.

If anyone else said it, we would call it a lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sometimes for a laugh I go over to Fox News to see how they are covering stuff. It is truly pathetic. One of their top stories right now headlines that "heads will roll" because Trump is unhappy with people leaking information related to his son's meeting. Uh, dude, the leaker is your F'ING SON. A little snippet for your entertainment:

President Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski predicted Wednesday that the leakers driving coverage of Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting last year with a Russian lawyer will be fired, as the White House reportedly scrambles to find the source or sources.

“Anybody, and I mean anybody who is not on the president’s agenda that works in this administration should absolutely be removed immediately,” Lewandowski told “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday morning.

“I don’t know who the leaker is but let me tell you this, if it were up to me, and somebody was speaking to the media [and leaking information detrimental to Trump], I would fire them on the spot, and Donald Trump will do the same,” he added.

"Littlefinger" Lewandowski? As in the psychopath pushed out by Javanka and Donnie Jr. This is some serious GoT plotting.

[Anonymous]

Two comments:

1) most of the leaks, like the one related to Donnie's email, were from within the White House.

2) Foreign IC can share whatever information it wants with whomever it wants.

Heads may roll, but they will be something like Kushner's attorney or some such. But foreign IC will be immune to Trump's threats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like this gem of a comment:

How unfortunate for the WSJ to run this zany front page hit piece of double uncorroborated heresay. What evidence exists that the Russians did in fact fish password=password Podesta and the forbidden access DNC server?

Why no discussion of the DNC meta data that documents that the 'hacker' was a DNC credentialed user downloading gigs onto a memory stick from the DNC internal network?

Who in Obama's intel agency unmasked Trump from 2015 and a year before his candidacy?

More importantly, why doesn't the WSJ tell its readers the insider stock info that circulates in their newsroom?

"Heresay". LMAO. Trumpnik chucklef*cks.