Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“When you get information that the Russians want to dig dirt on your opponent and give it to you and support you in your election, you go to the FBI. You don’t go to the meeting,”Krauthammer said.

Dana Milbank said it well. The Trump team should not be playing in this field. Incompetent+immoral=a lot of chance to get outmaneuvered by foreign interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-no-rookie-mistake-the-trump-team-shouldnt-even-be-on-the-field/2017/07/11/058faec6-6679-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.afc97544c4cf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“When you get information that the Russians want to dig dirt on your opponent and give it to you and support you in your election, you go to the FBI. You don’t go to the meeting,”Krauthammer said.

Dana Milbank said it well. The Trump team should not be playing in this field. Incompetent+immoral=a lot of chance to get outmaneuvered by foreign interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-no-rookie-mistake-the-trump-team-shouldnt-even-be-on-the-field/2017/07/11/058faec6-6679-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.afc97544c4cf

Milbank is a tool for the DNC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“When you get information that the Russians want to dig dirt on your opponent and give it to you and support you in your election, you go to the FBI. You don’t go to the meeting,”Krauthammer said.

Dana Milbank said it well. The Trump team should not be playing in this field. Incompetent+immoral=a lot of chance to get outmaneuvered by foreign interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-no-rookie-mistake-the-trump-team-shouldnt-even-be-on-the-field/2017/07/11/058faec6-6679-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.afc97544c4cf

Milbank is a tool for the DNC

Is this a Russian idiom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: Is hanging still the penalty for treason?

Mother will make sure Pence pardons all who are implicated.

I want to know what Mother knew and when.

She should be hauled in to testify. It's all the rage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why she was allowed into the U.S. is explained by the Washington Post:
http://wapo.st/2tbRnVC?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.d18f2c869b0b

Veselnitskaya represented Prevezon, which had been sued by the U.S. attorney in New York’s Southern District in a money-laundering case. It was while she was in that role that she also became an outspoken advocate for lifting economic sanctions imposed by Congress against Russia for human rights violations.

Veselnitskaya’s visa for U.S. entry was denied, but she received special permission — in what is known as a “parole letter” — to come to New York specifically to defend Prevezon and Katsyv. She said in a court statement, however, that when she tried to reenter the United States, she was detained at London’s Heathrow Airport and “unjustifiably subjected to a strip search, for no apparent reason.” She eventually received permission to come to the United States to continue her work for Prevezon.

That set the stage for Veselnitskaya to be in New York City in June 2016, where a hearing related to Prevezon case was being held in federal court. (Prevezon paid $6 million to settle the case in May; Reuters reported that Prevezon said it was a victory because no guilt was declared and the amount was far less than initially sought by the U.S. government.) While Veselnitskaya was in the city, she had an opportunity to try to get her message against the Magnitsky Act to the Trump campaign.

The meeting was arranged by a publicist named Rob Goldstone, who wrote to Donald Trump Jr. that he could arrange a meeting with “the Russian government attorney” who could convey “information that incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.” Trump Jr. responded that “if it’s what you say I love it.”

Then this lawyer violated her "parole letter" by conducting other business in the US. Why didn't Obama do anything about that? Still no answers about who granted the special permission. What circumstance changed over the initial denial?

You cannot be human. Because no human could possibly be this stupid.

Senator Grassley is not human? He asked these questions to DHS secretary in a letter.

The visa for her appearing in court was denied initially. The question is what changes led to a special waiver granted.

I remember the Prevezon case. People were mad that the settlement figure was low, but the government was happy because they just wanted to put a stop to the activity. I'm not surprised that the government catered to Prevezon to give them their desired lawyer for this extraordinary case.

It was settled after Preet Bharara was fired.

Connect the dots.

Do the dots include Gertler/Ziff/Och/CGI?

I don't know what any of those are, but Preet was fired and Sessions is the AG. You figure it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why she was allowed into the U.S. is explained by the Washington Post:
http://wapo.st/2tbRnVC?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.d18f2c869b0b

Veselnitskaya represented Prevezon, which had been sued by the U.S. attorney in New York’s Southern District in a money-laundering case. It was while she was in that role that she also became an outspoken advocate for lifting economic sanctions imposed by Congress against Russia for human rights violations.

Veselnitskaya’s visa for U.S. entry was denied, but she received special permission — in what is known as a “parole letter” — to come to New York specifically to defend Prevezon and Katsyv. She said in a court statement, however, that when she tried to reenter the United States, she was detained at London’s Heathrow Airport and “unjustifiably subjected to a strip search, for no apparent reason.” She eventually received permission to come to the United States to continue her work for Prevezon.

That set the stage for Veselnitskaya to be in New York City in June 2016, where a hearing related to Prevezon case was being held in federal court. (Prevezon paid $6 million to settle the case in May; Reuters reported that Prevezon said it was a victory because no guilt was declared and the amount was far less than initially sought by the U.S. government.) While Veselnitskaya was in the city, she had an opportunity to try to get her message against the Magnitsky Act to the Trump campaign.

The meeting was arranged by a publicist named Rob Goldstone, who wrote to Donald Trump Jr. that he could arrange a meeting with “the Russian government attorney” who could convey “information that incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.” Trump Jr. responded that “if it’s what you say I love it.”

Then this lawyer violated her "parole letter" by conducting other business in the US. Why didn't Obama do anything about that? Still no answers about who granted the special permission. What circumstance changed over the initial denial?

You cannot be human. Because no human could possibly be this stupid.

Senator Grassley is not human? He asked these questions to DHS secretary in a letter.

The visa for her appearing in court was denied initially. The question is what changes led to a special waiver granted.

I remember the Prevezon case. People were mad that the settlement figure was low, but the government was happy because they just wanted to put a stop to the activity. I'm not surprised that the government catered to Prevezon to give them their desired lawyer for this extraordinary case.

It was settled after Preet Bharara was fired.

Connect the dots.

Do the dots include Gertler/Ziff/Och/CGI?

Bravo! But you forget Benghazi and Vince Foster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why she was allowed into the U.S. is explained by the Washington Post:
http://wapo.st/2tbRnVC?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.d18f2c869b0b

Veselnitskaya represented Prevezon, which had been sued by the U.S. attorney in New York’s Southern District in a money-laundering case. It was while she was in that role that she also became an outspoken advocate for lifting economic sanctions imposed by Congress against Russia for human rights violations.

Veselnitskaya’s visa for U.S. entry was denied, but she received special permission — in what is known as a “parole letter” — to come to New York specifically to defend Prevezon and Katsyv. She said in a court statement, however, that when she tried to reenter the United States, she was detained at London’s Heathrow Airport and “unjustifiably subjected to a strip search, for no apparent reason.” She eventually received permission to come to the United States to continue her work for Prevezon.

That set the stage for Veselnitskaya to be in New York City in June 2016, where a hearing related to Prevezon case was being held in federal court. (Prevezon paid $6 million to settle the case in May; Reuters reported that Prevezon said it was a victory because no guilt was declared and the amount was far less than initially sought by the U.S. government.) While Veselnitskaya was in the city, she had an opportunity to try to get her message against the Magnitsky Act to the Trump campaign.

The meeting was arranged by a publicist named Rob Goldstone, who wrote to Donald Trump Jr. that he could arrange a meeting with “the Russian government attorney” who could convey “information that incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.” Trump Jr. responded that “if it’s what you say I love it.”

Then this lawyer violated her "parole letter" by conducting other business in the US. Why didn't Obama do anything about that? Still no answers about who granted the special permission. What circumstance changed over the initial denial?

You cannot be human. Because no human could possibly be this stupid.

Senator Grassley is not human? He asked these questions to DHS secretary in a letter.

The visa for her appearing in court was denied initially. The question is what changes led to a special waiver granted.

I remember the Prevezon case. People were mad that the settlement figure was low, but the government was happy because they just wanted to put a stop to the activity. I'm not surprised that the government catered to Prevezon to give them their desired lawyer for this extraordinary case.

It was settled after Preet Bharara was fired.

Connect the dots.

Do the dots include Gertler/Ziff/Och/CGI?

Bravo! But you forget Benghazi and Vince Foster.

Pizzagate. Jade Helm. Death Panels. Open borders. Uranium. Hillaryfones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“When you get information that the Russians want to dig dirt on your opponent and give it to you and support you in your election, you go to the FBI. You don’t go to the meeting,”Krauthammer said.

Dana Milbank said it well. The Trump team should not be playing in this field. Incompetent+immoral=a lot of chance to get outmaneuvered by foreign interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-no-rookie-mistake-the-trump-team-shouldnt-even-be-on-the-field/2017/07/11/058faec6-6679-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.afc97544c4cf

Milbank is a tool for the DNC

Is this a Russian idiom?

No, it's a fake news idiom to cover up the gerrymandering of a candidate who in the end lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth there are crickets of the following picture on Natalia Veselnitskaya's facebook page at the woman's march back in January.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1821397691411631&set=pb.100006242531258.-2207520000.1499883259.&type=3&theater

She attended an anti-trump rally on Jan. 22. I doubt CNN will cover this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“When you get information that the Russians want to dig dirt on your opponent and give it to you and support you in your election, you go to the FBI. You don’t go to the meeting,”Krauthammer said.

Dana Milbank said it well. The Trump team should not be playing in this field. Incompetent+immoral=a lot of chance to get outmaneuvered by foreign interests.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-no-rookie-mistake-the-trump-team-shouldnt-even-be-on-the-field/2017/07/11/058faec6-6679-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.afc97544c4cf

Milbank is a tool for the DNC

Maybe, but he is correct on the perils of this amateur hour presidency.

[Anonymous]

WSJ (that bastion of liberal fake news owned by Newscorp, parent of FOX) is reporting that these IC has proof of Russian-Trump collusion going back to 2015.

Who wants to defend this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth there are crickets of the following picture on Natalia Veselnitskaya's facebook page at the woman's march back in January.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1821397691411631&set=pb.100006242531258.-2207520000.1499883259.&type=3&theater

She attended an anti-trump rally on Jan. 22. I doubt CNN will cover this.

LOL. Good try! Little Lyin Don Jr is as dirty as they come. Facebook won't change that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth there are crickets of the following picture on Natalia Veselnitskaya's facebook page at the woman's march back in January.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1821397691411631&set=pb.100006242531258.-2207520000.1499883259.&type=3&theater

She attended an anti-trump rally on Jan. 22. I doubt CNN will cover this.

Er, so? Her participation in a protest (was she there or just posting about it, I thought she'd already left the country) does not excuse that DJT Jr thought she was a Kremlin lawyer with good dirt on Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ (that bastion of liberal fake news owned by Newscorp, parent of FOX) is reporting that these IC has proof of Russian-Trump collusion going back to 2015.

Who wants to defend this?

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ (that bastion of liberal fake news owned by Newscorp, parent of FOX) is reporting that these IC has proof of Russian-Trump collusion going back to 2015.

Who wants to defend this?

Link?

Wall Street Journal. I think you can find it.