Russians Compromising Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This just in: Steele was the case officer for Litvinenko.

Sorry Trumpers, he's the real deal.

Yeah, personally I don't have any confidence that he's a scammer as a PP explained. I'm not at all surprised he took off from this circus. Doesn't mean he's got something to hide or that he's a small-time con artist.

[Anonymous]

He's obviously hiding from Putin's assassins. I mean, duh.

Guy is a bigger patriot for the US then millions of actual US citizens and Trump voters.

[Anonymous]

Trump claimed having wild sex while in Russia

www.gq.com/story/howard-stern-donald-trump-russia-brag?

[Anonymous]

Any one brushing this under the carpet has NO love of country, integrity, or decency -- just like the Golden Shower Cow they worship. Sad!!!

[Anonymous]

A very important part of this story is who paid Mr Steele to generate the dossier. Many reporters know, but only list the Washington politically connected law firm who paid and leaked the dossier as a "Washington firm". If you knew the name everything would make sense. It's a pretty clear connections to a few politicians. I guess they get special treatment by the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A very important part of this story is who paid Mr Steele to generate the dossier. Many reporters know, but only list the Washington politically connected law firm who paid and leaked the dossier as a "Washington firm". If you knew the name everything would make sense. It's a pretty clear connections to a few politicians. I guess they get special treatment by the media.

Say it was Jeb! Bush. Is that very important? Whether Steele has ethics or made up stuff is important. Whether he found anything or not (seems like he did...) is important. If we know that the firm was getting a paycheck from the opposition, then what does that tell us?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A very important part of this story is who paid Mr Steele to generate the dossier. Many reporters know, but only list the Washington politically connected law firm who paid and leaked the dossier as a "Washington firm". If you knew the name everything would make sense. It's a pretty clear connections to a few politicians. I guess they get special treatment by the media.

Say it was Jeb! Bush. Is that very important? Whether Steele has ethics or made up stuff is important. Whether he found anything or not (seems like he did...) is important. If we know that the firm was getting a paycheck from the opposition, then what does that tell us?

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

[Anonymous]

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

Whoever commissioned it must not have had much faith in it or they would have publicized it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

If we're going by rumor, then that's not true. Initially Mr Steele started on the dossier because he was commissioned to do it, and the more he found, the more alarmed he got and the deeper he dug. This is from back in the fall, when rumors were swirling. Do you remember?

Also, Mr Steele was working with the FBI by October, when he got alarmed at what he was finding. Was this on his own initiative, with the permission of the people who originally asked him to find dirt on Trump? Was this at their direction? Was this against their wishes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

Whoever commissioned it must not have had much faith in it or they would have publicized it.

Giving it to the FBI isn't good enough for you?

[Anonymous]

It is likely those who commissioned it were former 'never Trumpers' who are now under his tent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump claimed having wild sex while in Russia

www.gq.com/story/howard-stern-donald-trump-russia-brag?

Look there is little doubt in everyone's mind that Trump is a perv after his comments about his daughter and his convo with Billy Bush. Of course, he has sex with hookers. The question is how does this leave him indebted to Russia. I would not be surprised if the story was true, which lead the IC to decided WITH Trump to leak the story so it is out there and he can dismiss it as fake and minimize the blackmail opportunity. Now they only have him by the balls financially, which is far more problematic. I bet Trump ends up using American taxpayer money for a large payoff to the mob under some other guise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A very important part of this story is who paid Mr Steele to generate the dossier. Many reporters know, but only list the Washington politically connected law firm who paid and leaked the dossier as a "Washington firm". If you knew the name everything would make sense. It's a pretty clear connections to a few politicians. I guess they get special treatment by the media.

Say it was Jeb! Bush. Is that very important? Whether Steele has ethics or made up stuff is important. Whether he found anything or not (seems like he did...) is important. If we know that the firm was getting a paycheck from the opposition, then what does that tell us?

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

I love the sound of desperation in a Trumpkins post.

The dossier is not important as an independent document., it's signifiance appears to be consistent with a whole bunch of other one on about. Trump and Russia.

Of course, Trump could release his tax returns and prove his claim that he Has no financial ties to Russia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A very important part of this story is who paid Mr Steele to generate the dossier. Many reporters know, but only list the Washington politically connected law firm who paid and leaked the dossier as a "Washington firm". If you knew the name everything would make sense. It's a pretty clear connections to a few politicians. I guess they get special treatment by the media.

Say it was Jeb! Bush. Is that very important? Whether Steele has ethics or made up stuff is important. Whether he found anything or not (seems like he did...) is important. If we know that the firm was getting a paycheck from the opposition, then what does that tell us?

The only reason Mr Steele put the dossier together was because he was commissioned to do it. The people paying him have a political agenda and are connected to a candidate. If their names came out it would be a shit storm, but by all means continue chase the dog's tail.

I love the sound of desperation in a Trumpkins post.

The dossier is not important as an independent document., it's signifiance appears to be consistent with a whole bunch of other one on about. Trump and Russia.

Of course, Trump could release his tax returns and prove his claim that he Has no financial ties to Russia.

It's the money and sharing info that is significant, not the hookers.

[Anonymous]

The Ukraine actively seemed to influence the election as well:
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

They tried to sabotage Trump. This is probably part of their propaganda.