No, you are not right. |
Just let me get through this election and I’ll see what I can do—Barack to Putin on a live mic Amirite? |
“Larry Lindsey, Bush 43’s National Economic Council Director, met with House GOP leadership and said he enlisted psychiatrists to analyze Trump and that China views POTUS as a "total narcissist" -- "a 10-out-of-10 narcissist." He said this was because his mother didn’t pay adequate attention to him as a child. - Jake Sherman, Politico |
That did indeed happen. Never did get a convincing explanation for it either. |
No, you are not right. Exactly what actions did Obama take that Putin liked? Was it the sanctions that put an economic squeeze on Russia? Or the US military presence is Syria, denying Russia open access to a warm water port? Or was it legitimizing Kim (oh, right, that was Trump) or was it expelling Russian spies from NY and the Eastern Shore in December 2016? |
In an unsealed document, the Mueller investigation discloses that Micahel Flynn provided proof of obstruction of justice including a voice mail material to the future charge.
In addition, Flynn provided evidence around the relationship between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign. I can't wait to see what IG Horowitz finds and cannot understand how or why the GOP thinks this is a winning strategy. |
None of this is going to be admissible when the truth comes out. |
Uh, this is the truth. Why would Flynn take a plea deal that inflicts sever penalty of perjury and then lie. And how do you explain the President's voice mail message obstructing justice? And how was the member of congress also obstructing justice? That has to be one of Barr's redactions. The public has a right to know. |
Sorry you cannot use your brain. |
If 'reaching out to Wikileaks' were legal, as Bill Barr falsely claimed, then Mueller could not include Flynn's cooperation on the matter in mitigation. But he did. So that is another strike Barr. |
Admissible? In court? Before Congress? In the general public? It's admissible in the court of public opinion. And before Congress. |
They actually don’t. |
Yes, I would like to know if it was my Congressperson who was obstructing justice on behalf of the president. |
A federal judge has ordered prosecutors to file transcripts with the court Ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's conversations with Russian officials by May 31st.
![]() |
DC judge orders USDOJ to post public transcript of Michael Flynn voicemail that purports to capture Trump/ Congress efforts "that could have affected both his willingness to cooperate and the completeness of that cooperation." |