So, what do you propose when your school does not have the classes they promised. |
No they aren’t. |
What evidence do you have for that, for MS/HS-level classes without any lab or other physical components, for motivated and focused students? |
Why don't you google virtual education outcomes during the pandemic? Remember when all parents were losing their minds because MCPS stayed virtual for an additional semester than many other school districts? They were outraged because students were struggling academically with Zoom classes. Ample evidence exists about virtual education and its poor outcomes. |
Oh come on, you don't seriously think that the challenges of forced across-the-board virtual learning during the pandemic mean that the entire concept of virtual learning doesn't work, do you? I can't believe I have to explain this to you and honestly don't even know where to start. It sounds like you do not in fact have any evidence for this belief besides wanting to compare apples to oranges... |
I recall they were mixed. Better students did well without the in person classes. Which is consistent with the general idea that no we don't need much from the schools, and withholding better classes is more about politics. |
MCPS shut down its post-COVID virtual academy because the academic outcomes were so bad compared to in-person schools. |
We did virtual for several years and had a great experience, better than in person. There were more labs than we've had in person. It takes a good teacher and students willing to participate and parent support. We had to buy supplies for the labs and hands on projects but it was no big deal. Instead of using others as a talking point, use your experience. It was great for us. |
No, that's not why they shut it down. The data families and staff did said it was equal or better when you look at the population it served. MCPS and BOE deliberately did not release the data. Can you show us the data showing bad outcomes? |
What labs or physical components? My kids have had zero in-person for science. They had more in virtual. Its teacher and school-specific. |
|
Pushback on the viability of recreating magnet programs on regional basis:
https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/08/13/mcps-program-changes-concerns/ |
Good, and we need a lot more of this. It was strategic that they introduced this proposal during the summer, when fewer parents and teachers are paying attention. They sought no input, and they thought they could build momentum for it before there the pushback. The best comment is the final line: “Because we can have all these wonderful regions … but if we still have a disparity in the outcomes, are we really putting the equity lens on that?” This is what I keep coming back to regarding the proposal: what does it actually fix? What's the point of destroying these great programs? There's no logic or rationale to it. |
Yay! |
They are not destroying the programs. They are expanding access to the programs for the great many who are able to handle the rigor but did not have application luck. |
LOL. this reminds me of my kid's medical school anatomy lab. getting your hands on real dead body is so much different than looking at some pics on computer. carry on |