| The little I’ve seen is so vile, so widespread, and so incriminating for Trump. It’s shocking he wasn’t impeached this week. This is a group of 100-200 men who are depraved and intent on ruining the world, yes world, for their own sick fantasies. |
You have the link? Because I don’t believe you. |
They divided us against each other. |
|
I think it's obscene that the revelations in the Epstein files are not front page news.
It's also obscenely stupid that this thread has been taken over with an insane person obsessed with Israel. |
You're asking the PP to post child porn? The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough.. |
|
Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves. |
It is very simple: our government doesn’t GAF about the victims. It is clear that none of the men involved will suffer any repercussions beyond public embarrassment. |
I wasn’t. I just wanted a source for this. There is a lot of information. |
Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't. |
The article was good enough. |
And yet, most, if not all, of the email addresses are redacted. Names, locations, etc. But not the victims. How utterly convenient. Makes you wonder who the DOJ actually thinks the victims are in this whole thing? |
Agree. Also doubt that JE was loyal to any one group. He did anything for $ and power. |
I hope you end up in rehab soon. |