Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

But mostly Trump. Like really mostly Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

And yet, most, if not all, of the email addresses are redacted. Names, locations, etc. But not the victims. How utterly convenient. Makes you wonder who the DOJ actually thinks the victims are in this whole thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The main thing to focus on right now is justice for the victims of sexual assault and trafficking. And obviously, pedophilia. There's plenty of time to trace back which governments benefited from and manipulated this information. For now, eyes on the prize: getting the criminals brought to justice.

Agree. Also doubt that JE was loyal to any one group. He did anything for $ and power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is on record as saying Epstein was a creep, and not allowed as his properties, before it all came out. I’m no Trump fan, but he was not his friend.

There are many photos of the two of them hanging out together though…

They went to the same parties. Doesn’t mean they are friends.

I hope you end up in rehab soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The main thing to focus on right now is justice for the victims of sexual assault and trafficking. And obviously, pedophilia. There's plenty of time to trace back which governments benefited from and manipulated this information. For now, eyes on the prize: getting the criminals brought to justice.

Agree. Also doubt that JE was loyal to any one group. He did anything for $ and power.

Let's be honest, everything in FBI file seem to suggest he was more loyal to one group in particular than others. Even the particular type of victims he chose align with this ideology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

The article was good enough.

NP. The article only talks about photos of young women or possibly teen victims:

"The Justice Department published dozens of unredacted nude images on its website, showing young women or possibly teenagers whose photos were contained in files related to the wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

"The people in the photos appeared to be young, although it was unclear whether they were minors."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

And yet, most, if not all, of the email addresses are redacted. Names, locations, etc. But not the victims. How utterly convenient. Makes you wonder who the DOJ actually thinks the victims are in this whole thing?

It looks like the DOJ is both ill-intentioned and incompetent. Not an encouraging combination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The main thing to focus on right now is justice for the victims of sexual assault and trafficking. And obviously, pedophilia. There's plenty of time to trace back which governments benefited from and manipulated this information. For now, eyes on the prize: getting the criminals brought to justice.

Agree. Also doubt that JE was loyal to any one group. He did anything for $ and power.

Let's be honest, everything in FBI file seem to suggest he was more loyal to one group in particular than others. Even the particular type of victims he chose align with this ideology.

Let it go. We’ve all read your posts. Epstein was loyal to Epstein and his bank account. You realize he was using or blackmailing everyone in his circle. His ideology was extreme capitalism at any cost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ummmm they ate him! They were impregnating the girls and taking the babies

Why though? For what purpose? Are they schizophrenic?

Adenochrome. Its in the files. They are worshipping Moloch and sacrificing them. jE even writes in his emails that “newborns taste like cream cheese”. Its absolutely insane and horrifying.

Its all there.

This is ridiculous and absurd. Who is Moloch? This is so stupid.

AI generated

"Moloch is an ancient deity, primarily known from the Hebrew Bible, associated with the horrific practice of child sacrifice, often depicted as a bull-headed idol demanding victims in fire. Beyond this religious context, "Moloch" has evolved to symbolize any powerful, destructive force or system that demands immense sacrifices (like human lives, well-being, or progress) for its own continuation, appearing in literature (Milton, Henry Miller), film, games (D&D), and modern discussions about societal traps like arms races or dangerous AI."

[Anonymous]

How long until someone has set up a mirror site of the Epstein docs attached to an LLM search engine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

The article was good enough.

NP. The article only talks about photos of young women or possibly teen victims:

"The Justice Department published dozens of unredacted nude images on its website, showing young women or possibly teenagers whose photos were contained in files related to the wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

"The people in the photos appeared to be young, although it was unclear whether they were minors."

You are truly disgusting. Shame on you. It doesn't matter if they are all minors. They were abused by a very powerful network of depraved wealthy men. None of this is their fault, no matter how much your brain wants to justify that any of this is not how truly abhorrent and morally wrong and dangerous to all of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

The article was good enough.

NP. The article only talks about photos of young women or possibly teen victims:

"The Justice Department published dozens of unredacted nude images on its website, showing young women or possibly teenagers whose photos were contained in files related to the wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

"The people in the photos appeared to be young, although it was unclear whether they were minors."

You are truly disgusting. Shame on you. It doesn't matter if they are all minors. They were abused by a very powerful network of depraved wealthy men. None of this is their fault, no matter how much your brain wants to justify that any of this is not how truly abhorrent and morally wrong and dangerous to all of us.

Keep up. I was posting in response to the person who claimed there were photos of bound toddlers. Yes, it matters whether the photos were of toddlers or not. Sorry you don't believe the New York Times, but stop spreading fake news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Useful summary for those of us without bandwidth to go through it all. What a bunch of pathetic men. Given they are all so wealthy, not understanding why they couldn’t buy dates with consenting adults??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

And yet, most, if not all, of the email addresses are redacted. Names, locations, etc. But not the victims. How utterly convenient. Makes you wonder who the DOJ actually thinks the victims are in this whole thing?

Or what their orders were.