Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Curious about how things will play out with Bondi. If she has any brains and self-preservation instincts — hard to say, but I think yes? — her knowledge of what was withheld from the Epstein files could make her a dangerous person to cross. I suspect the “special private sector opportunity, TBA” that’s her next job will be quite cushy.

On the other hand, Trump and his crowd have no respect for women and he’s increasingly erratic, so who knows where this will end up in the long run?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

People need to add some context to the tweets other than the link. Lots of browsers don't open Twitter links natively.

Sorry to pick on yours.

Here's what it says:

BREAKING NYT:

Trump has discussed firing Pam Bondi in recent days as he grows frustrated with her leadership at the Justice Department and her handling of the Epstein files, according to four people familiar with the conversations.

What did he want her to do differently with regard to the files? She had everything connected to him covered up. What more did he want?

Cover up in such a way that releasing those files wouldn't raise more questions. Unfortunately, the administration is inept, so that leaked through to the files they released with poor redactions, and making it clear that additional documents were being withheld.

[Anonymous]

“Most transparent administration ever” won’t let investigators with the House Oversight Committee look at the money piece of Epstein’s crimes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curious about how things will play out with Bondi. If she has any brains and self-preservation instincts — hard to say, but I think yes? — her knowledge of what was withheld from the Epstein files could make her a dangerous person to cross. I suspect the “special private sector opportunity, TBA” that’s her next job will be quite cushy.

On the other hand, Trump and his crowd have no respect for women and he’s increasingly erratic, so who knows where this will end up in the long run?

Pammy just might have an accident like falling out a window.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curious about how things will play out with Bondi. If she has any brains and self-preservation instincts — hard to say, but I think yes? — her knowledge of what was withheld from the Epstein files could make her a dangerous person to cross. I suspect the “special private sector opportunity, TBA” that’s her next job will be quite cushy.

On the other hand, Trump and his crowd have no respect for women and he’s increasingly erratic, so who knows where this will end up in the long run?

She will be the victim of an unfortunate accident.

[Anonymous]

I knew it. Now the media coverage, the discussion is *about* the files, about the politics, what’s happening with them.

Bad men and women did bad stuff. It’s right there. Go after them with justice.

Let’s get back to the point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have there been any real bombshells about the President in the files released so far? Seemed far more problematic for Clinton.

If full teams are needed to redact Trump's name, then it's pretty clear that there are more Trump bombshells in the Epstein files than there are currently in Iran.

And if pp is in denial that his named was redacted thousands of times, then how do they explain the word don’t (Don T) being redacted. Lol

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Looks like Blanche is supporting closing the Epstein matter at DOJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Blanche is supporting closing the Epstein matter at DOJ.

That’s what’s being reported. He thinks the files belong in the past. Wonder how the MAGA faithful will take it, not that they will ever read or see his comments.

[Anonymous]

So Blanche is going to Defy the law Congress passed nearly unanimously last year? It's not state secrets being protected, so will the Supreme Court let that pass?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Blanche is going to Defy the law Congress passed nearly unanimously last year? It's not state secrets being protected, so will the Supreme Court let that pass?

At least one justice is rumored to be in the files, so...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Blanche is going to Defy the law Congress passed nearly unanimously last year? It's not state secrets being protected, so will the Supreme Court let that pass?

At least one justice is rumored to be in the files, so...

Who??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Blanche is going to Defy the law Congress passed nearly unanimously last year? It's not state secrets being protected, so will the Supreme Court let that pass?

At least one justice is rumored to be in the files, so...

Thomas? That's a given. But Alito and Roberts wouldn't surprise me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Blanche is going to Defy the law Congress passed nearly unanimously last year? It's not state secrets being protected, so will the Supreme Court let that pass?

Well, hopefully Iran or other will leak them at this point.