Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles ditched and escaped to Scotland while Harry was still in London.
I think it is safe to say that Charles is a terrible father.

Or Harry is a terrible so. Charles just lost HIS father there is nothing wrong with reducing drama while you’re grieving.

Most parents would be upset with their kid for leaving the family business but demanding to still get paid by it, going on television to air all the family dirty laundry while his father was on his deathbed, and throwing in some outright lies in the process (they were married the wedding, Archie was denied the title he was entitled to). I don’t blame Charles a bit and probably would have lost some respect for him if he embraced Harry with open arms.

You know Charles had to have been less than thrilled that Harry chose to marry an American, divorcee, D-lister with lots of family drama. Nonetheless, Meghan went on record talking about how welcoming they were. Charles even walked her down the aisle when her own father flaked. Charles has every right to feel utterly betrayed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles is allegedly trying to block Harry from all family events in the future.
If this is true, he is truly a terrible, terrible father and a horrible human.

Nah, that's the right way to do it. Harry thinks he's too cool for school. But even as a prince, the rules apply to him.

Well, most people who publicly criticize their family for being so awful that their spouse became suicidal wouldn’t want to join future family events. Which leads me to believe, the BRF weren’t so awful to Harry and Meghan. If they were that bad, wouldn’t they give up their titles and refuse to attend engagements with them?

I wouldn’t blame Charles one bit for blocking them at future events. Isn’t that what happened to Edward and Wallis? I bet if Harry were to return without Meghan, he’d be welcomed with open arms.

After the queen’s reign ends, Charles will be held to account for his behavior. The monarchy will be his to lose and it’s not a guarantee. It’s pretty much a given that the commonwealth will go, but there will be much debate in England as well. Charles with his messy divorce from Diana and similarly messy handling of Harry’s departure will be lucky to make it to a coronation. If anything this shows he’s particularly unsuited for the role, which naturally calls into question the wisdom of a hereditary office that is so costly to taxpayers.

Current MPs are already openly expressing a desire to end the monarchy after Elizabeth. This sentiment is only going to get stronger with time.

Disagree.

Charles will play the Grandfather King. He will focus on popular causes like the environment and historic preservation. Will, Kate and the kids will curate a very British brand built on service.

No drama.

Harry will have a few years of success here. They’ll get a bump when their daughter arrives. But he will regret walking away within the next 10 years.

Agree.

This is spot on. Charles will do just fine as King. Will and Kate will continue to step up their act and, as they grow, their kids will become more of a focus. If there’s one thing Kate will do well, it’s to make sure her kids are raised right and know how to perform their roles in the BRF.

The public interest in Harry and Meghan will wane as they age and become increasingly distant from the BRF. Charles and Will seem to be making sure they have no new stories to leak to the press. Let’s face it, the only reason anyone is interested in them is their connection to royals. One that is fully severed, they have no more scoop to sell. Harry is just another spoiled rich kid hussling to maintain his lifestyle and Meghan is a former D-lister forever trying to climb the social ladder. The big deals will dry up and they’ll blow through their Netflix and Spotify money.

+1. This seems like a very good prediction to me. Only part I’m not sure about is whether H&M will manage to blow through their money. It certainly won’t happen anytime soon. We are talking about a huge chunk of change.

+2 I agree with this astute prediction. The interest in H&M will wane and probably already is. Eventually they will be nothing more than sad caricatures who had a brief moment of glory, and will be reduced to positions of insignificance.

Post-Covid people are going to get busy with their own lives and will no longer have need for reality-drama distractions like this. H&M may not go broke but it will be a miserable marriage if it isn't already. Harry is essentially a man without a country, without a real profession and living in an era where egalitarianism is much more respected than royalty. Especially here in the U.S.

The irony is the outcome was predictable based on past royal family situations. This entire bunch is as dysfunctional as they come which is why many enjoy peeking at the fishbowl they live in. It's just another version of reality TV.

[Anonymous]

What I find really amusing is all the people throwing out their backs complaining about how they're so sick of Meghan being in the press and how terrible their PR is, but that's exactly what they're trying to fight against. You really think they're the ones pushing out the hundreds, if not thousands, of unflattering stories about them? Gullible numpties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I find really amusing is all the people throwing out their backs complaining about how they're so sick of Meghan being in the press and how terrible their PR is, but that's exactly what they're trying to fight against. You really think they're the ones pushing out the hundreds, if not thousands, of unflattering stories about them? Gullible numpties.

It's more that their PR game is pretty embarrassing. They're represented by Hollywood celebrities' go-to PR agency, Sunshine Sachs, which pushes out fluff pieces about them every other day, but they still can't stem the flow of unflattering stories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I find really amusing is all the people throwing out their backs complaining about how they're so sick of Meghan being in the press and how terrible their PR is, but that's exactly what they're trying to fight against. You really think they're the ones pushing out the hundreds, if not thousands, of unflattering stories about them? Gullible numpties.

It's more that their PR game is pretty embarrassing. They're represented by Hollywood celebrities' go-to PR agency, Sunshine Sachs, which pushes out fluff pieces about them every other day, but they still can't stem the flow of unflattering stories.

You're proving their point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I find really amusing is all the people throwing out their backs complaining about how they're so sick of Meghan being in the press and how terrible their PR is, but that's exactly what they're trying to fight against. You really think they're the ones pushing out the hundreds, if not thousands, of unflattering stories about them? Gullible numpties.

It's more that their PR game is pretty embarrassing. They're represented by Hollywood celebrities' go-to PR agency, Sunshine Sachs, which pushes out fluff pieces about them every other day, but they still can't stem the flow of unflattering stories.

Because they’re still up against the Royal Rota. They continue to be fair game for the British tabloids and as long as those stories generate interest, they’ll continue to push them out. The difference is that now the British tabloids are the last to know about anything newsworthy that they do—like the VaxLive concert—that’s getting covered by American (and international press.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all just so pathetic. Both sides. I used to be a meg and harry fan but am so tired of the constant news cycles....Can't it ever end?! When is enough enough?!

I haven't been following this thread, but came back after about a month and it just makes me sick. It is so nice to have Trump off of the airwaves and newscycles...When can this pair please just do their work without a global 24-7 deluge? Insufferable.

They’re found raising for Covid Vaccines... Are you this pissed at Selena Gomez and J-Lo as well?

DP. Why do you feel the need to defend them? You can’t force or guilt others into liking people they don’t like. Just let people have their opinions. It’s ok.

Why are you so triggered that people like them? And I’m defending them because I think VaxLive is a very worthwhile cause. It’s insanity that Kate stans are pissed they’re participating in a fundraising concert because it’s too close to Kate’s anniversary. Oh no! Covid vaccines are stealing their thunder!

It’s so petty. And it’s so satisfying to call out petty.

DP. Good for them for supporting VaxLive.

The announcement on Archewell, like everything on Archewell, came across as if they invented it, that the concert is their idea. It seems to be how they see themselves. But I'll be generous and just assume that they don't know how to do PR any differently, that they don't actually see themselves that way.

Really?

The Archwell headline literally read: Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Announced as Campaign Chairs for Global Citizen’s “VAX LIVE: The Concert to Reunite the World”

You couldn’t figure out that meant it’s a concert created by Global Citizen?

Mkay

WTF is "Global Citizen?" Last I checked we had countries and not the New World Order. Would never support just based on the name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles ditched and escaped to Scotland while Harry was still in London.
I think it is safe to say that Charles is a terrible father.

Or Harry is a terrible so. Charles just lost HIS father there is nothing wrong with reducing drama while you’re grieving.

Most parents would be upset with their kid for leaving the family business but demanding to still get paid by it, going on television to air all the family dirty laundry while his father was on his deathbed, and throwing in some outright lies in the process (they were married the wedding, Archie was denied the title he was entitled to). I don’t blame Charles a bit and probably would have lost some respect for him if he embraced Harry with open arms.

You know Charles had to have been less than thrilled that Harry chose to marry an American, divorcee, D-lister with lots of family drama. Nonetheless, Meghan went on record talking about how welcoming they were. Charles even walked her down the aisle when her own father flaked. Charles has every right to feel utterly betrayed.

Why are you hags so obsessed with her being a divorcee? Who cares in this day and age other than the pearl clutching old people? I mean, are you 90?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all just so pathetic. Both sides. I used to be a meg and harry fan but am so tired of the constant news cycles....Can't it ever end?! When is enough enough?!

I haven't been following this thread, but came back after about a month and it just makes me sick. It is so nice to have Trump off of the airwaves and newscycles...When can this pair please just do their work without a global 24-7 deluge? Insufferable.

They’re found raising for Covid Vaccines... Are you this pissed at Selena Gomez and J-Lo as well?

DP. Why do you feel the need to defend them? You can’t force or guilt others into liking people they don’t like. Just let people have their opinions. It’s ok.

Why are you so triggered that people like them? And I’m defending them because I think VaxLive is a very worthwhile cause. It’s insanity that Kate stans are pissed they’re participating in a fundraising concert because it’s too close to Kate’s anniversary. Oh no! Covid vaccines are stealing their thunder!

It’s so petty. And it’s so satisfying to call out petty.

DP. Good for them for supporting VaxLive.

The announcement on Archewell, like everything on Archewell, came across as if they invented it, that the concert is their idea. It seems to be how they see themselves. But I'll be generous and just assume that they don't know how to do PR any differently, that they don't actually see themselves that way.

Really?

The Archwell headline literally read: Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Announced as Campaign Chairs for Global Citizen’s “VAX LIVE: The Concert to Reunite the World”

You couldn’t figure out that meant it’s a concert created by Global Citizen?

Mkay

WTF is "Global Citizen?" Last I checked we had countries and not the New World Order. Would never support just based on the name.

Global Citizen is an NGO. That’s on par with being so clueless you don’t know what UNICEF or Doctors Without Borders are non-profits.

Wow. I’m embarrassed for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles ditched and escaped to Scotland while Harry was still in London.
I think it is safe to say that Charles is a terrible father.

Or Harry is a terrible so. Charles just lost HIS father there is nothing wrong with reducing drama while you’re grieving.

Most parents would be upset with their kid for leaving the family business but demanding to still get paid by it, going on television to air all the family dirty laundry while his father was on his deathbed, and throwing in some outright lies in the process (they were married the wedding, Archie was denied the title he was entitled to). I don’t blame Charles a bit and probably would have lost some respect for him if he embraced Harry with open arms.

You know Charles had to have been less than thrilled that Harry chose to marry an American, divorcee, D-lister with lots of family drama. Nonetheless, Meghan went on record talking about how welcoming they were. Charles even walked her down the aisle when her own father flaked. Charles has every right to feel utterly betrayed.

Why are you hags so obsessed with her being a divorcee? Who cares in this day and age other than the pearl clutching old people? I mean, are you 90?

Women aren't horses. Please stop your sexist language, pp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all just so pathetic. Both sides. I used to be a meg and harry fan but am so tired of the constant news cycles....Can't it ever end?! When is enough enough?!

I haven't been following this thread, but came back after about a month and it just makes me sick. It is so nice to have Trump off of the airwaves and newscycles...When can this pair please just do their work without a global 24-7 deluge? Insufferable.

They’re found raising for Covid Vaccines... Are you this pissed at Selena Gomez and J-Lo as well?

DP. Why do you feel the need to defend them? You can’t force or guilt others into liking people they don’t like. Just let people have their opinions. It’s ok.

Why are you so triggered that people like them? And I’m defending them because I think VaxLive is a very worthwhile cause. It’s insanity that Kate stans are pissed they’re participating in a fundraising concert because it’s too close to Kate’s anniversary. Oh no! Covid vaccines are stealing their thunder!

It’s so petty. And it’s so satisfying to call out petty.

DP. Good for them for supporting VaxLive.

The announcement on Archewell, like everything on Archewell, came across as if they invented it, that the concert is their idea. It seems to be how they see themselves. But I'll be generous and just assume that they don't know how to do PR any differently, that they don't actually see themselves that way.

Really?

The Archwell headline literally read: Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Announced as Campaign Chairs for Global Citizen’s “VAX LIVE: The Concert to Reunite the World”

You couldn’t figure out that meant it’s a concert created by Global Citizen?

Mkay

WTF is "Global Citizen?" Last I checked we had countries and not the New World Order. Would never support just based on the name.

LOL

That explains a lot...

Global Citizen is an anti-poverty organization. It’s the type of charity that is commonly referred to as non-profits or NGOs (non-governmental organizations.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all just so pathetic. Both sides. I used to be a meg and harry fan but am so tired of the constant news cycles....Can't it ever end?! When is enough enough?!

I haven't been following this thread, but came back after about a month and it just makes me sick. It is so nice to have Trump off of the airwaves and newscycles...When can this pair please just do their work without a global 24-7 deluge? Insufferable.

They’re found raising for Covid Vaccines... Are you this pissed at Selena Gomez and J-Lo as well?

DP. Why do you feel the need to defend them? You can’t force or guilt others into liking people they don’t like. Just let people have their opinions. It’s ok.

Why are you so triggered that people like them? And I’m defending them because I think VaxLive is a very worthwhile cause. It’s insanity that Kate stans are pissed they’re participating in a fundraising concert because it’s too close to Kate’s anniversary. Oh no! Covid vaccines are stealing their thunder!

It’s so petty. And it’s so satisfying to call out petty.

DP. Good for them for supporting VaxLive.

The announcement on Archewell, like everything on Archewell, came across as if they invented it, that the concert is their idea. It seems to be how they see themselves. But I'll be generous and just assume that they don't know how to do PR any differently, that they don't actually see themselves that way.

Really?

The Archwell headline literally read: Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Announced as Campaign Chairs for Global Citizen’s “VAX LIVE: The Concert to Reunite the World”

You couldn’t figure out that meant it’s a concert created by Global Citizen?

Mkay

WTF is "Global Citizen?" Last I checked we had countries and not the New World Order. Would never support just based on the name.

LOL

That explains a lot...

Global Citizen is an anti-poverty organization. It’s the type of charity that is commonly referred to as non-profits or NGOs (non-governmental organizations.)

That's double NO then. Unelected bureaucrats and "globalists" are the perfect foils for H&M dastardly duo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles ditched and escaped to Scotland while Harry was still in London.
I think it is safe to say that Charles is a terrible father.

Or Harry is a terrible so. Charles just lost HIS father there is nothing wrong with reducing drama while you’re grieving.

Most parents would be upset with their kid for leaving the family business but demanding to still get paid by it, going on television to air all the family dirty laundry while his father was on his deathbed, and throwing in some outright lies in the process (they were married the wedding, Archie was denied the title he was entitled to). I don’t blame Charles a bit and probably would have lost some respect for him if he embraced Harry with open arms.

You know Charles had to have been less than thrilled that Harry chose to marry an American, divorcee, D-lister with lots of family drama. Nonetheless, Meghan went on record talking about how welcoming they were. Charles even walked her down the aisle when her own father flaked. Charles has every right to feel utterly betrayed.

Why are you hags so obsessed with her being a divorcee? Who cares in this day and age other than the pearl clutching old people? I mean, are you 90?

Women aren't horses. Please stop your sexist language, pp

Hi ESOL student - nags you mean nags not hags. Hags are witches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all just so pathetic. Both sides. I used to be a meg and harry fan but am so tired of the constant news cycles....Can't it ever end?! When is enough enough?!

I haven't been following this thread, but came back after about a month and it just makes me sick. It is so nice to have Trump off of the airwaves and newscycles...When can this pair please just do their work without a global 24-7 deluge? Insufferable.

They’re found raising for Covid Vaccines... Are you this pissed at Selena Gomez and J-Lo as well?

If I had to see their names every day, for years on end, over stupid random things, yes.

Could they ever do something that was not highly publicized?!?!

Need a break!

Of course! But you don’t know about those things because: They’re not highly publicized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles ditched and escaped to Scotland while Harry was still in London.
I think it is safe to say that Charles is a terrible father.

Or Harry is a terrible so. Charles just lost HIS father there is nothing wrong with reducing drama while you’re grieving.

Most parents would be upset with their kid for leaving the family business but demanding to still get paid by it, going on television to air all the family dirty laundry while his father was on his deathbed, and throwing in some outright lies in the process (they were married the wedding, Archie was denied the title he was entitled to). I don’t blame Charles a bit and probably would have lost some respect for him if he embraced Harry with open arms.

You know Charles had to have been less than thrilled that Harry chose to marry an American, divorcee, D-lister with lots of family drama. Nonetheless, Meghan went on record talking about how welcoming they were. Charles even walked her down the aisle when her own father flaked. Charles has every right to feel utterly betrayed.

Charles certainly has had his share of “drama”, no? You’d lose respect for Charles embracing his son — but not for deceiving his son’s mother and destroying his son’s family in his wish to be reincarnated as Camilla’s tampon? Interesting values and priorities.