It's also bad if the President can claim whatever he wants and 60 million just nod their heads. |
Well most candidates publish their own tax returns. If the press lies, the candidates can point to the facts. Trump is free to do the same and show everyone all the income taxes he pays. |
It’s likely NY State. States and IRS share data. NYTs doesn’t have the printed returns themselves, but have all the data from the form entry fields. Mostly likely NYTs received an excel file with the data from a verified source in NY State government. And there’s not a damn thing the Fed’s can do about it |
What, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy? |
No they don’t. |
Yes, yes, nothing to see here. Just move along. Trump is not completely broke and facing $400 million to $1 billion in debts to foreign creditors coming due soon. It is in no way a national security threat. Move along! |
They certainly DO NOT. Candidates have voluntarily released their returns for the last 40 years. Only Trump is “special.” |
| I don't care. MAGA. |
You're right. Nobody I'm MAGAland cares. |
Of course you don't. Fraud is not a real crime. And there's nothing wrong with being terrible at business. |
|
Evading taxes overseas to own the libs, or something.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/question-how-donald-trumps-scottish-resorts-are-financed-just-became-even-more-urgent-2985977 |
Owning the libs through tax evasion and fleecing gullibles. MAGA, I guess. |
I doubt it is a state or federal source unless it is someone on an audit team plus I am sure the IRS has locked it down right. It sounds like they have more than just the tax transcripts. The story says they have “years of employee compensation information and records of cash payments between the president and his businesses, as well as information about ongoing federal audits of his taxes.“ That would be more than the IRS normally gets outside an audit. My guess is that it’s from a lender or someone else he sought financing from. |
Or his current accounting firm or lawyers. NYT said it came from someone who was legally allowed to have them, so that probably excludes former lawyers, employees, etc. |
|
If you care more about how they were obtained, and less about what is in them, you're part of the problem.
He could easily put this to bed and make his returns public on his own. There is a reason he hasn't done this. And you all know it. Even Richard Nixon released his returns after initially refusing. He refused b/c once he did, it showed problems. Same thing here. |