The BIG ONE: 20 years of Trump taxes obtained by NYTs

[Anonymous]

If this is true, then there is one year in the covered period where about 100 million in taxes should have been due.

[Anonymous]

This expose details outrageous behavior. Cannot believe he can have his debts written off like that - AND that he can avoid paying taxes on those forgiven debts. Just incredible.

[Anonymous]

I really am ignorant here so asking in good faith.

I am sure Trump is being sleazy and dishonest - that is a given. But why does the tax code allow those with large real estate holdings to play these games? What’s in it for Uncle Sam? I can usually understand the arguments even when I disagree with them for most things in the tax code. But this one I don’t get.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

beware of the ex-daughter in law, LOL

[Anonymous]

can't wait until January 20th

[Anonymous]

Hehehe rubbing hands together with glee; get ready you scoundrel this thread is back on top!!!

[Anonymous]

Time to pay for his crimes.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile, in Scotland ...

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, in Scotland ...

I hope they investigate.

Why does Trumpie get his loan forgiven but people can't get their college loan forgiven?

Once again, Trump screws the taxpayers. First in NJ, now in IL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, in Scotland ...

I hope they investigate.

Why does Trumpie get his loan forgiven but people can't get their college loan forgiven?

Once again, Trump screws the taxpayers. First in NJ, now in IL.

And his goon supporters just lap his junk up and offer up an incoherent jumble of everyone else should pull themselves up by their bootstraps or better business people or socialism.

[Anonymous]

Tick tock, MFers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really am ignorant here so asking in good faith.

I am sure Trump is being sleazy and dishonest - that is a given. But why does the tax code allow those with large real estate holdings to play these games? What’s in it for Uncle Sam? I can usually understand the arguments even when I disagree with them for most things in the tax code. But this one I don’t get.

Because tax law is written by rich people for rich people.

[Anonymous]

Thread: Trump’s longtime personal banker at Deutsche Bank has abruptly resigned.