Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ bot.

Here's Luke Rosiak, hero to wingnuts and gynocomastia sufferers:

https://me.me/i/hi-im-luke-rosiak-i-keep-forgetting-to-mention-that-18538469

"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Saul Alinksy

Here's another one from Obama's and Hillary's mentor:

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"

Looks like DCUM libs have this one down pat!

I've been deeply involved in liberal politics for over 40 years and never heard anyone other than conservatives quote Alinsky. You guys seem to have memorized every word ever said. The obsession is really weird. Note, you started quoting Alinsky just after posters started bashing the Washington Post rather than discussing the substance of the article. Also, after I was personally attacked. So, maybe you don't just memorize Alinsky, but practice what he said as well.

Did you seriously not know of Hillary's association with Saul Alinsky back in the day?

I know what conservatives have been saying about it. I've never cared about it myself. Alinsky is far better known among conservatives than liberals.

Thank you, but you completely avoided answering the question. Why?

[Anonymous]

Wassaman.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ bot.

Here's Luke Rosiak, hero to wingnuts and gynocomastia sufferers:

https://me.me/i/hi-im-luke-rosiak-i-keep-forgetting-to-mention-that-18538469

"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Saul Alinksy

Here's another one from Obama's and Hillary's mentor:

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"

Looks like DCUM libs have this one down pat!

I've been deeply involved in liberal politics for over 40 years and never heard anyone other than conservatives quote Alinsky. You guys seem to have memorized every word ever said. The obsession is really weird. Note, you started quoting Alinsky just after posters started bashing the Washington Post rather than discussing the substance of the article. Also, after I was personally attacked. So, maybe you don't just memorize Alinsky, but practice what he said as well.

Did you seriously not know of Hillary's association with Saul Alinsky back in the day?

I know what conservatives have been saying about it. I've never cared about it myself. Alinsky is far better known among conservatives than liberals.

Thank you, but you completely avoided answering the question. Why?

I think I answered the question. I have no personal knowledge of any association of Clinton and Alinsky. I have heard many allegations by conservatives. I have no idea if those allegations are true. I am not sure why it would matter. I have never voted for any Clinton and don't care who they associated with "back in the day".

[Anonymous]

Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ bot.

Here's Luke Rosiak, hero to wingnuts and gynocomastia sufferers:

https://me.me/i/hi-im-luke-rosiak-i-keep-forgetting-to-mention-that-18538469

"When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger" - Saul Alinksy

Here's another one from Obama's and Hillary's mentor:

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"

Looks like DCUM libs have this one down pat!

I've been deeply involved in liberal politics for over 40 years and never heard anyone other than conservatives quote Alinsky. You guys seem to have memorized every word ever said. The obsession is really weird. Note, you started quoting Alinsky just after posters started bashing the Washington Post rather than discussing the substance of the article. Also, after I was personally attacked. So, maybe you don't just memorize Alinsky, but practice what he said as well.

Did you seriously not know of Hillary's association with Saul Alinsky back in the day?

I know what conservatives have been saying about it. I've never cared about it myself. Alinsky is far better known among conservatives than liberals.

Thank you, but you completely avoided answering the question. Why?

I think I answered the question. I have no personal knowledge of any association of Clinton and Alinsky. I have heard many allegations by conservatives. I have no idea if those allegations are true. I am not sure why it would matter. I have never voted for any Clinton and don't care who they associated with "back in the day".

Kind of a snake answer. All you are really saying here is you are uninformed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

Actually, he said above he's never voted for a Clinton. That said, NOT knowing this speaks to being someone who selectively reads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

...even more....it gets worse...

When she interviewed Alinsky, he offered her a job. And not only that, but Clinton contacted Wellsley shortly after he won the WH to request that all theses be "under lock and key." Couldn't have the public knowing what an Alinskyite his wife was.

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/alinskys-daughter-heres-the-truth-about-hillary-the-media-wont-tell-you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

...even more....it gets worse...

When she interviewed Alinsky, he offered her a job. And not only that, but Clinton contacted Wellsley shortly after he won the WH to request that all theses be "under lock and key." Couldn't have the public knowing what an Alinskyite his wife was.

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/alinskys-daughter-heres-the-truth-about-hillary-the-media-wont-tell-you

You know all these things, yet you do not realize that her thesis rejected Saul Alinsky's methods as ineffective.

What is your media, and why didn't they tell you this???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

...even more....it gets worse...

When she interviewed Alinsky, he offered her a job. And not only that, but Clinton contacted Wellsley shortly after he won the WH to request that all theses be "under lock and key." Couldn't have the public knowing what an Alinskyite his wife was.

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/alinskys-daughter-heres-the-truth-about-hillary-the-media-wont-tell-you

You know all these things, yet you do not realize that her thesis rejected Saul Alinsky's methods as ineffective.

What is your media, and why didn't they tell you this???

If you know so much, you would know that while she rejected his tactics, she did not reject his goals. She merely realized that the better way to achieve "social justice" (to use a term libs would understand) would be to work through government - not the organization model that Alinsky espoused.

Re the media, I'd be interested in where you get your news. Since I want a broad perspective, I watch or read CNN, FOX, C-SPAN, the WaPo (although it is increasingly making my stomach turn), the WSJ, Washington Times, and others. Reporting from the left, middle, and center.

[Anonymous]

Typical liberals - selective memory. I subscribe to the theory of keep your friends close and your enemies closer, however the left ignores this on a regular basis.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

As I have said multiple times -- apparently conservatives struggle with literacy and must have things repeated to them -- I know of this only from being told by conservatives. I had no reason to research Clinton's college thesis and couldn't care less what she wrote about.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1

I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?

...even more....it gets worse...

When she interviewed Alinsky, he offered her a job. And not only that, but Clinton contacted Wellsley shortly after he won the WH to request that all theses be "under lock and key." Couldn't have the public knowing what an Alinskyite his wife was.

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/alinskys-daughter-heres-the-truth-about-hillary-the-media-wont-tell-you

You know all these things, yet you do not realize that her thesis rejected Saul Alinsky's methods as ineffective.

What is your media, and why didn't they tell you this???

If you know so much, you would know that while she rejected his tactics, she did not reject his goals. She merely realized that the better way to achieve "social justice" (to use a term libs would understand) would be to work through government - not the organization model that Alinsky espoused.

Re the media, I'd be interested in where you get your news. Since I want a broad perspective, I watch or read CNN, FOX, C-SPAN, the WaPo (although it is increasingly making my stomach turn), the WSJ, Washington Times, and others. Reporting from the left, middle, and center.

Hold it, so Clinton rejected Alinsky's tactics, yet conservatives are mindless repeating "Alinsky #1" and "Alinsky #7" and then asking if we have read Clinton's thesis? There is no way to interpret this than it meaning conservatives have no idea about what they are talking.

[Anonymous]

Wasn't Hillary personally associated with Alinsky?
I do believe so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Hillary personally associated with Alinsky?
I do believe so.

I read that she interviewed him for a thesis. Also, that she was offered a job by him but turned it down.

Alinksy was a community organizer. Some say that Obama followed his guidelines when he was a community organizer.